Hi!
I consider to re-install my mail-server from scratch (several reasons, one
of them is to get better management-options on the Intel Server Board inside
the server, another is that it is easier for me to keep the server updated
with RPM packages than compiling everything manually every time
Hi
all,
I'm unable to get my
emails from outlook or other pop3 mail clients...
here is my
configuration :
Sun solaris 2.9 box
in my private network (no public IP address) : IP = 192.168.1.13 /
255.255.255.0
bash-2.05#
qmail-showctlqmail home directory: /var/qmail.user-ext delimiter:
I would setup dnscache on your mail server (I run it on one of mine with
about 5,000 users and 1,000 or so vhosts, so load shouldn't be an issue)
following this document : http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/run-cache.html
Let me know if this helps
Thanks,
Derek
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:31 pm,
Florent Gilain wrote:
Hi
all,
I'm
unable to get my emails from outlook or other pop3 mail clients...
here
is my configuration :
Sun
solaris 2.9 box in my private network (no public IP address) : IP =
192.168.1.13 / 255.255.255.0
snip
Any
help would be very very
http://vpopmail.sf.net/
This should fix all known problems with 5.3.29.
Michael Bowe
- Fixed logic error in update_rules(), to prevent update_rules
failed error being generated on the first attempt for a
roaming user to POP auth [833926]
- Remove id column in PostgeSQL's vpopmail table.
Subject: [vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.3.30 released
http://vpopmail.sf.net/
This should fix all known problems with 5.3.29.
Michael Bowe
- Fixed logic error in update_rules(), to prevent update_rules
failed error being generated on the first attempt for a
roaming user to POP auth [833926]
On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 06:05 PM, Gary wrote:
Is this release to be considered useable in a production environment
where
5.3.29 was not?
For some users, 5.3.29 had serious problems that prevented it from
working. 5.3.30 should have fixed those problems.
I'm still using 5.3.20 on my
Tom Collins wrote:
On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 06:05 PM, Gary wrote:
Is this release to be considered useable in a production environment
where
5.3.29 was not?
For some users, 5.3.29 had serious problems that prevented it from
working. 5.3.30 should have fixed those problems.
I'm
BTW, I have been using 5.3.29 in production for quite some time and it does
work really well. (One running RH 7.3 the other running SuSE 8.2)
Remo Mattei
Network Security Engineer
cell 801-209-8554
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
