This is new video I created with my 35mm adapter. Its footage collected from spring 06. Any
other criticism is welcome.
Please leave comments on site. I have trouble finding replies most of the time on newgroups.
Link to Page with Stills and all downloadable qualities [URL=""
sorry this is fully working link
Link to Page with Stills and all downloadable qualities
http://www.vilekyle.com/Vid%20Blogs/Love%20Life%20pics
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant
nope, this is the community ecobiz activist karen chen of the san
francisco bay area... i have no idea what hand-coding is but will not
rule out the possibility of superstardom someday. good to meet you
and everyone in this group, everyone has been super helpful and i'm
stoked to report that i
On Wed, 24 May 2006 09:34:57 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows and Linux users who want to broadcatch are going to be SOL if the
only video format you output is QT.
Why? There are players for both Windows and Linux. Matt said 90% of his
traffic comes from
I don't see anything in there that would let me invite you. Maybe you
need a gmail account first? I'll send you an invite for that.
On 5/24/06, Jen Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aw, you need an invite to use Google Analytics -- anybody got one???
jen
jenSimmons
Sorry, Jan? Were you asking if this would work for node 101? I guess I could see this working if you guys wanted to create a node 101 group in iTunes. However, it's exclusive in itunes. So you can only mark your vlog as belonging to one group.
As for the rest of the email, the proposal of a
Yes, Mike, that was the question... Interesting that you can only belong to one group. Thanks for the reply.
Jan
--
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion
http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound
http://the-hold.blogspot.com - poetry
http://dagnyhemingway.blogspot.com - machinima
I see this as a positive for vlogging anyone else?
Google Adds Video Capability to AdSense
Move Greatly Increases Online Inventory
By Abbey Klaassen
http://adage.com/article?article_id=109419
Published: May 23, 2006
NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Google has made no secret about its ambitions
to
On Wed, 24 May 2006 15:39:25 +0200, bordercollieaustralianshepherd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see this as a positive for vlogging anyone else?
Why?
So videobloggers can put more ads on their vlogs?
So videobloggers can pay Google to have their vlog-ads featured on other
websites?
Those
I got freaked out last night because Rudy got an AdSense account and
used our Galacticast e-mail address... I don't want crappy banner ads
on my site and I don't want a few cents for putting video on my
videoblog. I think Google AdSense is all about the propaganda... put
our ads on your site
-- Forwarded message --From: fvanderpoel [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: May 23, 2006 3:47 PM
Subject: [vlogeurope] FIRST INTERNATIONAL FLIPBOOK FESTIVALTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Put your idea in a flipbook! Make a political or satyrical statement! Show your art and
present your music!
All I can think of is all the golden video this will produce :)On 5/23/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Josh- I think you'd be great at doing something like All By Myself
by Eric Carmen or Total Eclipse of the Heart by Nikki French (?).
Slow... powerful... painful... beautiful...
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 09:34:57 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows and Linux users who want to broadcatch are going to be SOL
if the
only video format you output is QT.
Why?
The impact on inovation. In terms of thinking that blogs are like TV,
yeah I agree on the two points you made.
More opportunities will open up as well as gains in technology . So I
am assuming those of you that have been doing this a while, will be
like artists changing medium, palette,
i think that will be "golden state" video ;-)
speaking of loaded puns about golden state videos, here is an archive
gem that shows Market Street in 1905 (the street that Vloggercon is
on). There have been a few changes since then (and a few quakes and
fires).
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, LeanBackVids.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.missileblast.com
vs.
http://www.rocketboom.com
It's Viral advertising for www.soupmovie.com.
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant
Imagine, this being used to *distribute* your vlog! Yes, use the adsense video ad serving engine to serve up YOUR vlog to targeted sites. You'd be paying for click through traffic, but what if you had a compelling story you wanted to tell? It doesn't have to be about SELLING something...
On
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, bordercollieaustralianshepherd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Experienced Vloggers might even be in demand as consultants to
business.
Video/RSS experience is already in demand. If you're a vlogger
looking for work, just hunt down the companies that would
Google AdSense is lucrative if you have a high-traffic site, more so if you have a few high-traffic niche sites. It's not propaganda in the least. Google is one of the main reasons more TV advertising dollars are being diverted towards the Internet, thanks to their text ads. I'm not sure this
I don't think you're wrong. In fact, it's possible one of the most viable tracks of all. I say go for it. Viva net video ads. -- cheers r Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively my vlog: http://r.24x7.com reliable hosting: http://foo.24x7.comOn May 24, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Adam Quirk
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google AdSense is lucrative if you have a high-traffic site, more so
if you
have a few high-traffic niche sites. It's not propaganda in the least.
But you know what I mean, Adam... 95% of sites can't make a decent
No WONDER why MissleBlast has so many viewers... ingenious marketing...
Casey
http://www.galacticast.com/
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, elle_webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, LeanBackVids.com
leanbackvids@ wrote:
http://www.missileblast.com
On Wed, 24 May 2006 19:03:37 +0200, Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Google AdSense is lucrative if you have a high-traffic site, more so
if you
have a few high-traffic niche sites. It's not propaganda in
True that, both of ya.Forgot to link up Waverlyfilms in the first post:http://www.waverlyfilms.com/They're my heroes.On 5/24/06,
Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 19:03:37 +0200, Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,
only if those are the same 95% ;-)
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 19:03:37 +0200, Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Adam Quirk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Google AdSense is lucrative if you have a
The whole remember your first time thing got me thinking and I was
just wondering myself, what was the ONE vlog episode that really got
you. The one where you sat up and really noticed, something that moved
you, or made you angery or just made you go hmm. Something that
sticks with you
Yes, it's peanuts, but so far I'm not finding any other way to make
money from my web hobby - art for art's sake is all very well, but
doesn't put the kid through college. (Nor do Italian salaries.)
--
best regards,
Deirdré Straughan
www.beginningwithi.com (personal)
www.tvblob.com (work)
Ryanne pulling stinky beige clumps out of her throat.
Heath wrote:
The whole "remember your first time" thing got me thinking and I was
just wondering myself, what was the ONE vlog "episode" that really got
you. The one where you sat up and really noticed, something that moved
you,
Either way only a max. of 1/10 will be really annoyed. That's alright :o)
I have google ads on a couple of minisites where people can download some
php scripts I wrote. The sites are low traffic and the ads pay for hosting
of all my projects and a little more. Making my hobby free is what I
here's an interesting site out of malaysia:
http://www.asia247.tv/
connecting to each other.connecting to each other
Jay
--
Adventures in Videoblogging
http://www.momentshowing.net
http://FireAnt.tv
http://node101.org
Cell: 917 371 6790
SPONSORED LINKS
Wow... that was ingenious. Bekah has got to be my new favorite
vlogger! I think if I showed more of my goofy side, my vlog would
look more like hers...
Casey
http://www.galacticast.com/
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The whole remember your first time
Ewww, when did that happen?On 5/24/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryanne pulling stinky beige clumps out of her throat.
Heath wrote:
The whole remember your first time thing got me thinking and I was just wondering myself, what was the ONE vlog episode that really
I wanted to keep this conversation going - been thinking about it for a while now.Looking for help thinking through this...So if I release work under creative commons share alike - people are free to use my work commercially only when they use the work in it's unaltered entirety, for example, a
Stupid me, I put the wrong post in, (not that wasn't a good one as
well, but it was the one Called Became a Nurse from that archive
page...that one makes more sense with the rest of my comments
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow... that
What Am I? by Dave H.:
http://davemedia.blogspot.com/2005/08/vlog-post-what-am-i.html
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The whole remember your first time thing got me thinking and I was
just wondering myself, what was the ONE vlog episode that really
On Wed, 24 May 2006 20:50:14 +0200, Michael Verdi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if I release work under creative commons share alike - people are
free to
use my work commercially only when they use the work in it's unaltered
entirety, for example, a compilation DVD or revlog on a site with
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 20:50:14 +0200, Michael Verdi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if I release work under creative commons share alike - people are
free to
use my work commercially only when they use the
On Wed, 24 May 2006 21:11:33 +0200, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why can't by-sa be mixed with nc-sa?
Because the first stipulates that any new works must be released under a
by-sa license while the second stipulates that the new work must be
released under a nc-sa license.
As the CC
Actually , Master Wayne, the post you linked the first time went
perfectly with your personality... as it did with my own.
Casey
http://www.galacticast.com/
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stupid me, I put the wrong post in, (not that wasn't a good one
[Casey wipes the tears from her eyes]
Woah... okay, I see what you mean now.
Casey
http://www.galacticast.com/
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stupid me, I put the wrong post in, (not that wasn't a good one as
well, but it was the one Called Became a
I would think the more restrictive includes both: by-nc-sa.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 21:11:33 +0200, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why can't by-sa be mixed with nc-sa?
Because the first stipulates
Master Wayne? now i'm confused...On 5/24/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Casey wipes the tears from her eyes]Woah... okay, I see what you mean now.Caseyhttp://www.galacticast.com/--- In
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stupid me, I put the wrong post
Bruce Wayne is Batman's real name and his butler calls him Master
Wayne..it's a comic geek thing..some have the whole tech
geek thing we have the comic geek thing...and the fact I call myself
the Batman Geek.
THAT should clear things up.
Heath - Batman Geek
No, it must be the *same* license.
- Andreas
On Wed, 24 May 2006 22:09:26 +0200, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think the more restrictive includes both: by-nc-sa.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006
WOW - totally ingenious! Now I understand why she always talk about
her boyfriend not calling her back.
Whoever thought of it - hats off to you.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No WONDER why MissleBlast has so many viewers... ingenious
heath = batman geek = bruce wayneOn 5/24/06, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Master Wayne? now i'm confused...On 5/24/06, Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Casey wipes the tears from her eyes]Woah... okay, I see what you mean now.Caseyhttp://www.galacticast.com/
--- In
Michael Verdi wrote:
I wanted to keep this conversation going - been thinking about it for a
while now.
Looking for help thinking through this...
So if I release work under creative commons share alike - people are
free to
use my work commercially only when they use the work in it's
Though it doesn't look like it should.
- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it must be the *same* license.
- Andreas
On Wed, 24 May 2006 22:09:26 +0200, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think the more restrictive
That's pretty brilliant!
I've been waiting for this for a long time. The only problem is,
it seems like they're treating it like a text ad rather than something
that's inserted before/after a video. I'd rather have the option
of a real video ad that's part of the video experience, rather than
I apologize in advance if this is seen as a plug, but I just wanted to
let people know that I've updated the bookmarklets on VlogMap. If you
have installed one of these bookmarklets, you will need to delete it
and reinstall.
These bookmarklets allow you to geovlog and revlog while browsing
Maybe there is just a massive delay, but...
Are posts automatically published or do one of these moderators have
to approve each one?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/members?group=mod
(Sent at 1:47 PM PT)
SPONSORED LINKS
And now we dance!
;
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, LeanBackVids.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay did a video back in December of 2004 called Videobloggers invade
the TV box, yet I did not see it until a month or two ago. It gave
me the wow feeling all over again...
On Wed, 24 May 2006 22:52:34 +0200, LeanBackVids.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe there is just a massive delay, but...
Are posts automatically published or do one of these moderators have
to approve each one?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/members?group=mod
Messages are
What part of If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you *may*
distribute the resulting work *only* under a license identical to this
one is unclear to you (emphasis mine)?
And from the legal code:
You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly
digitally
Legal loophole: can a work have two licenses simultaneously?
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
What part of "If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you *may*
distribute the resulting work *only* under a license identical to this
one" is unclear to you (emphasis mine)?
And from the
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
Normally, yes, but not in this care. The license says:
"You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly
digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License,
a later version of this License with the same License
Just as it is the duty of all men to obey just laws, so it is the duty
of all men to disobey unjust laws.
-- Martin Luther King Jr.
;
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What part of If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you
*may*
On Wed, 24 May 2006 23:23:27 +0200, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
Normally, yes, but not in this care. The license says:
You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly
digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this
oh, indeed. perfectly clear!On 5/24/06, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Wayne is Batman's real name and his butler calls him MasterWayne..it's a comic geek thing..some have the whole techgeek thing we have the comic geek thing...and the fact I call myself
the Batman Geek.THAT
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 23:23:27 +0200, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
Normally, yes, but not in this care. The license says:
You may distribute, publicly display, publicly
It didn't say "equal to" though. It said "contains the same".
In vernacular English it can go either way. Do you have a picture of
Lindsay Lohan and one of Keira Knightly on your website? Cool, my site contains
the sameones. (But I also have a picture of a decapitated
elephant.) And my
So is the sampling license the way to go for allowing remixing?
http://creativecommons.org/license/sampling?format=audio
-- Enric
-==-
http://www.cirne.com
http://www.cinegage.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it must be the
Legal licenses are written in legal vernacular. Since neither of us are
lawyers we get to use the human-readable description to guide us to the
right interpretation of same. It reads: If you alter, transform, or
build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a
Any license which is not a Share-Alike allows for easy re-use in one form
or another. It's up to each individual to choose which one is best for
them.
- Andreas
On Wed, 24 May 2006 23:45:02 +0200, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So is the sampling license the way to go for allowing
"You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly
digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License,
a later version of this License with the same License Elements as this
License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains the same
The translations are identical (they give/retain the same rights), but
must be considered different licenses since they are adapted for each
jurisdiction.
Are we done nitpicking or do you have an actual point to get to?
- Andreas
On Wed, 24 May 2006 23:51:09 +0200, Charles HOPE [EMAIL
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
The translations are identical (they give/retain the same rights), but
must be considered different licenses since they are adapted for each
jurisdiction.
Are we done nitpicking or do you have an actual point to get to?
Sure. If the 2nd phrase has any
When I first saw this by Graham:
http://www.archive.org/download/GrahamWalkerTravelsinTibetYounggirlsings/
Girl_Sings.mov
I knew I had seen something important. It remains one of the vlog posts that remains most
meaningful to me.
Dave H.
SPONSORED LINKS
okay - wow - this has gone far (but interesting) from what I was asking about so let me try again.The licence that I was talking about was BY-SA. I DO want to allow remixes and sampling. According to that license if you alter or make a derivitive work you must release it under the same license
I've just started visiting http://missbhavens.blogspot.com/ and think
her vlogs are great.
Thanks Heath for the screw-up, becuase both clips were wonderful.
Mike
http://vlog.mikemoon.net
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Casey wipes the tears
Inspired by something missbhavens said, I present to you, Tourist in
My Own Town - Lakeview Park, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
http://moon.blogspot.com/2006/05/tourist-in-my-own-town-lakeview-park.html
I'd love to see what's in your town. Post you vlog links.
Mike
http://vlog.mikemoon.net
http://chope.blip.tv/posts/?topic_name=new%20york
Mike Moon wrote:
Inspired by something missbhavens said, I present to you, "Tourist in
My Own Town - Lakeview Park, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada".
http://moon.blogspot.com/2006/05/tourist-in-my-own-town-lakeview-park.html
I'd love to
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd love to see what's in your town. Post you vlog links.
Seattle (using Google Earth):
http://www.leanbackvids.com/videoblog/seattle/mirror-world/
-Matt
SPONSORED LINKS
So share would be a poor choice of words since it connotates
permission whereas the license restricts.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any license which is not a Share-Alike allows for easy re-use in one
form
or another. It's up
Vloggercon is around the corner. If you're in the area and want to
work on it, come this Friday May 26th at Maxfield's House of Caffiene,
3:30 pm. Show you're attending at upcoming.org:
http://upcoming.org/event/80623/
;),
Enric
-===-
http://www.cirne.com
http://www.cinegage.com
Sorry I've been traveling and not had time to keep up ...On 5/20/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's interesting here is that you and others think that you have
rights to use equipment that is not yours. ... am not completely deaf to the idea, but I think that the
hidden
Jay - Thanks for this! Some great stuff there but of course Southeast
Asia is one of my favorite parts of the world so I am biased. :-)
Aloha,
Rox
On 5/24/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here's an interesting site out of malaysia:
http://www.asia247.tv/
connecting to each
That's not the way I read the License.
Attribution Share Alike (by-sa)
This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial
reasons, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical
terms. This license is often compared to open
These stats were a little suprising to me...
quote
Hitwise, the traffic intelligence firm, recently reported that as of
May 20, nearly 43 percent of all video searching was done through YouTube.
MySpace Videos is second with 24.2 percent of the video search
traffic, Yahoo Video Search third
consider the source
http://www.hitwise.com/
it would be nice to know who commissioned this report?
my guess would be none other than youtube
these industry reports are things you pay to have produced
they are far from unbiased or scientific
note the research store menu item
How can I have the right to sell fruit but not have the right to charge
more for the watermelons than the oranges?
David Meade wrote:
Sorry I've been traveling and not had time to keep up ...
On 5/20/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's interesting here is
The magic here is who they are charging. Telcos could charge the consumer per KB if they wanted. But the dont.
So instead we're supposed to let them prioratize what can be published? That doesnt make any sense.
Charge me for the video I consume ... ok ... sucks but ok. (market competition
I'm doing 100 things at once so I appologize for typing/spelling/etc ... but to cary your example out a bit Charles ...
They arent asking to charge more for watermelons ... they are asking to charge watermelon farmers more for the right to sell the product than they are apples.
On 5/25/06,
David Meade wrote:
The magic here is who they are charging. Telcos could charge
the consumer per KB if they wanted. But the dont.
So instead we're supposed to let them prioratize what can be
published? That doesnt make any sense.
Are you demanding that FedEx deliver all packages
On 5/25/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you demanding that FedEx deliver all packages for the same price? Yes, perhaps they wish to charge a flat rate per ounce. But what if they wanted to charge businesses more than nonprofits? What if they wanted to take bids? What if they
hey--
i want you to check a new project we've created:
http://havemoneywillvlog.com/
Ryanne, Markus, Verdi and I started this site to help videobloggers
fund cool projects that otherwise would not happen.
To begin, We chose to help support a new Human Dog series that is
ready to be edited.
On Thu, 25 May 2006 07:26:23 +0200, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i want you to check a new project we've created:
http://havemoneywillvlog.com/
Ryanne, Markus, Verdi and I started this site to help videobloggers
fund cool projects that otherwise would not happen.
I like the
87 matches
Mail list logo
