--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, rudy.jahchan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a human interaction of breaking contract and at some point
needs to be dealt as such.
-- Enric
Everyone, listen to Enric. He is wise and terrible, like a god. I
shall raise a holy army in his name
well in the context of the flash players he builds, both xml specs are used
specifically for playlists.
On 1/3/07, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/3/07, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] sulleleven%40gmail.com wrote:
maybe someone linked to your feed in the forums for testing xspf/rss
I didnt realize before that the digg was to my blog post.
so, i made a more entertaining image to go along with it
http://spreadthemedia.org/files/ohmyheavy.jpg
;)
night.
sull
On 1/4/07, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good news, folks. The story has now made the front page of
Den 04.01.2007 kl. 08:07 skrev rudy.jahchan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is no difference. Copyright is what enables licensing. And
since they're linking rather than re-hosting, there is no copyright
issue.
Incorrect. Copyright states who owns and has the right to make
decisions on a piece
I wrote a fairly long blog entry about this on my blog,
http://www.orient-lodge.com/node/2117
Heavy.com and the dangers of social network investing
I'm forwarding this on to some investors that I know. For those of you who
have had your work improperly placed on heavy.com, can any of you provide
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Aldon Hynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote a fairly long blog entry about this on my blog,
http://www.orient-lodge.com/node/2117
Heavy.com and the dangers of social network investing
I'm forwarding this on to some investors that I know. For those of
And an additional follow up:
I went out to Polaris Venture Partners website and found the list of their
partners. I sent an email to their three managing general partners, as well
as to Bob Metcalfe who is a general partner there as well as a well know
name in the internet.
Here is what I sent:
When I described Myheavy.com as privately help I got 'em mixed up
with that other Maxim-esque site, Break.com. My bad.
thats averry cool player enric.
how can i use that
randy
On 1/3/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've made a custom version of vPIP for a customer, TechnoLawyer. The
changes are in the included flash FLV player (cirneViewer.swf):
- The flash player is larger, 450x340.
- The visual
Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... It's not from our use of the flash player. He has some new
Flash player versions that can subscribe to RSS feeds, and he
likes to demo them.
Sounds right.
I just used Interarchy to trace the connections made when you play a
video off blip.tv.
That looks awesome Enric!
On 1/4/07, RANDY MANN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thats averry cool player enric.
how can i use that
randy
On 1/3/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] enric%40cirne.com wrote:
I've made a custom version of vPIP for a customer, TechnoLawyer. The
changes are in the
Man, I take a break from the web for a night and all hell breaks
loose Has anyone heard from Myheavy? Mike, Casey, David
anyone? My vids are one there as well and I will need to send an
email but are we hearing back, or are they turning a deaf ear?
Please let me know and the group as
I havent heard anything back from them yet. Maybe they are looking for
their checkbook to send me my $68,000? ha!
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Man, I take a break from the web for a night and all hell breaks
Hello guys,
I thought I'd share with you the fact that golf's governing body (The Royal
Ancient) has put pressure on The Carnoustie Golf Links and has had them remove
the vlog of their preparations for The Open 2007.
I was wondering if anyone else had had experience of this and if you thought
i think practicality wins out here Lucas
it appears that the divining job was not too tough for them as the
videos I indicated to them are now removed.
markus
On Jan 3, 2007, at 10:03 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
You refused to identify the vids, asking them to figure out for you
what those
Didn't our Republican led government just hamstring our ability to
get together to form class action lawsuits? Or was that just for
medicine?
Ron Watson
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://k9disc.com
http://pawsitivevybe.com/vlog
http://pawsitivevybe.com
On Jan 3, 2007, at 10:15 PM, Enric wrote:
There is absolutely no reason not to blog about this whenever it happens.
It's not about mobbing for sake of mobbing. This is a legit concern and it
should be on the radar of any reputable service in this space.
Sull is right. On the contrary, we SHOULD blog about this. First because
this
I don't want to be a broken record, and I really hate to admit that I
might have tinfoil hats tucked away for easy access, but if I were
interested in putting down citizen media, and I had billions of
dollars at my disposal, I would create a legal black hole to put
folks like Blip out of
I wrote them this:
I've found out that you have reposted my videos, violating the license that
is clearly shown in each video.
Please take down these videos from your site immediately. Don't tell me they
were uploaded by a member - they were not.
I am contacting my laywers about this case.
Peter
They are modifying my video and releasing it under a different
license for profit and they are not giving me attribution. Seems
pretty cut and dried to me.
Ron Watson
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://k9disc.com
http://pawsitivevybe.com/vlog
http://pawsitivevybe.com
On Jan 4, 2007, at 1:32 AM,
[snip]
On 1/3/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A custom flash player
written by online video company MyHeavy.com that overlays
their logo,
display ads on top prior to rolling and such is clearly
different to
any observer and the consumer from a browser.
Not to the web it
I just got off the phone with Heavy's CFO and followed up with an e-mail
listing specific areas of infringement. I expect to hear from them in
the next hour or so, and if I do not I will follow up with another phone
call.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[snip]
okay...so they are just pulling in videos from feeds...and
overlaying the watermark/videos on top...
as Lucas says...yes, video hosting sites like Blip.tv can
just redirect...
and insert all Blip ads into the old URL...
I can do this on a case-by-case basis.
Seems to me that we are doing quite well raising some shit. Don't think that
laywers is the only thing a funded company is afraid off. Users raising shit
scares them even more.
Peter
On 1/4/07, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to be a broken record, and I really hate to admit
It's a really big Internet, and Heavy is much more concerned with the 17
year old boy sitting in front of his computer at 11 PM than they are
with you. How much influence do you have over that kid?
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
The Referer header is unreliable.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lucas Gonze
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:25 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
thanks for your nice words Bev!
... I'm assuming you get stuff to download and transfer?
... Richard
On 1/4/07, Bev Sykes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard (Show) Hall has been very helpful to me. This is basically some
wonderful information that he shared:
I do everything manually - I
thanks for the update Mike, and everyone else so far
just one more example of why I love Blip and Mike
Heath
http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got off the phone with Heavy's CFO and followed up with an e-
When I see a company stealing my video, putting their ads on it, not
respecting with attribution or linkbacks, I get angry. I don't think
it's because someone is profiting of my work. It's more like, they are
*breaking* this new world we are trying to build. They are going
against the reason
I agree with both of you.
The problem here is, that, like it or not, we have very little clout;
a couple hundred thousand hits, hell a couple million, isn't even a
drop in the bucket. We are very narrow in our reach. Especially as we
tend to not lend our support to the mass markets of
I am glad to see this outrage...MyHeavy went too far. There is
clearly a cause of action with damages. Is it time for a class action
suit? Is there a NY lawyer around?
Or perhaps a better way would be for all vloggers in NY to take
MyHeavy to small claims court for the maximum.
Ten small
Litigation is expensive and difficult. I've been on the phone with
them, and I'm hopeful that we can resolve this issue with simple
communication and without the need for lawyers. That said, if we have
to, we'll have our attorneys send them a nastygram. We're not at that
point yet, though.
http://newteevee.com/2007/01/03/vulnerability-discovered-in-apple-quicktime/
Vulnerability Discovered in Apple
QuickTimehttp://newteevee.com/2007/01/03/vulnerability-discovered-in-apple-quicktime/
12 Written by Jackson West
http://newteevee.com/author/jackson-west/-Posted Wednesday, January
3,
I use Blip.tv combined with http://www.freevideocoding.com to post my videos on
various projects. Blip.tv provides free video hosting and tracks views (as
Steve pointed out).
Blip.tv also provides direct links to the videos. A direct link to your video
allows you to use
And since it's earlly days still, I think we HAVE to shout out about
this. We have to make a fuzz. We have to sue, if necessary. If not,
100s of other companies will do the same. We have to set the rules, or
they will set them, and that won't be good. And that's why it's good
to get
Update.
It appears that all my videos have been remove from their site.
Such a shame too. I was thinking that $68,000 would have made a nice
donation to Blip. Sorry Mike.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I
I met Bob Metcalfe earlier this year, and I sent him a heads up.
-K, askaninja.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Aldon Hynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote a fairly long blog entry about this on my blog,
http://www.orient-lodge.com/node/2117
Heavy.com and the dangers of social
On 1/4/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Referer header is unreliable.
Faking the Referer header *would* be a cause worth litigating, but
they're not doing that.
Yup, it looks like they've cleaned their act up. I'm expecting a call
from their CEO in a few minutes, so I'm guessing that will be the
message he delivers.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Howell
Sent: Thursday,
Right, but not every user-agent responsibly reports the referer header.
In most user-agents it's an option that can be turned off. Many (maybe
even most) personal firewalls strip the referer header from outgoing
requests. Windows Media Player, iirc, never sends it.
-Original
On 1/4/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's correct. The problem is that we do want to be picky. We want to
allow people to use VPIP to play back videos hosted on blip, but we
don't want to allow them to use the MyHeavy player on MyHeavy.com
(unless it's the content creator
Searching their site, I can't actually find any videos that are via
Google Video, and I note that the search on Freetime used to turn up a
TON of videos other than mine, all of which have disappeared, too.
But what do they care? They needed the site to look video-rich to attract
users. They've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did the site break, or did they just clear out a chunk of their collection?
An hour ago I found my videos in there, along with several others, simply
by searching for 'hawaii.' Now, there's only one result.
Ryan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
I use blip already and crosspost to my other blog sites from there. I
think it works great.
I know they track views but, the issue I'm working on is getting
credit for the traffic. Because in starting to launch my next site
I've met various sponsor/advertising types and they all tell me that
in
This is a case for Brainstorming. For example, what's wrong with a
tool which allows each user to define a whitelist and blacklist? If
that were doable it would be a wonderful competitive advantage for
Blip. If I worked there I would propose that Blip be the first video
hosting
Yes, my search for cirne came up empty. Looks like they removed
both my blip.tv and Google Video entries. Yes!
This is a human problem of disregarding a license. And the human
responses have been clear, specific to the problem and resolved
quickly. The interactions with Veoh and Heavy with
I thought I'd share with you the fact that golf's governing body (The Royal
Ancient) has put pressure on The Carnoustie Golf Links and has had them
remove
the vlog of their preparations for The Open 2007.
I was wondering if anyone else had had experience of this and if you thought
we
Posted to Casey's digg:
http://digg.com/tech_news/MyHeavy_Stealing_Works_Without_Permission#c4564127
or
http://tinyurl.com/vpfdx
==
by HeavyCarson
Hey guys we've taken the search and play functionality from Blip and Google
down.
After reading these comments and posts it's clear
They've just posted a comment about this on digg. Seems to be the
'we're a search engine' pseudo-justification. Someone please remind
them of what happened to google image search!
And argh, the old attempts to cling to an opt-out model when they
relaunch their 'search facility'.
Heres link to
Well, mine has disappeared from Heavy, I did send them an e-mail, but
they didn't get back to me.
Thanks again, Mike, ever thought of running for President or at least
Mayor of New York??
Paul Knight
On 4 Jan 2007, at 16:23, Mike Hudack wrote:
Litigation is expensive and difficult. I've
There's a message on the digg entry about this,
http://tinyurl.com/yd349m
, apparently from someone who works at Heavy:
===
Hey guys we've taken the search and play functionality from Blip and
Google down. After reading these comments and posts it's clear that we
need to clarify
I agree with you Mike that Litigation is expensive and difficult, but
honestly, heavy.com can afford to pay for back revenues they have
generated. That's all I want.
In Web2.0 Land, part of the money-making scheme is having users
populate a site with content to make the site valuable. We have
This is a case for Brainstorming. For example, what's
wrong with a
tool which allows each user to define a whitelist and
blacklist? If
that were doable it would be a wonderful competitive advantage for
Blip. If I worked there I would propose that Blip be the
first video
They have disabled their aggregation functionality entirely for the time
being. I just got off the phone with their CEO, who was very contrite.
We'll be meeting with them next week to figure out how to do this right,
and allow people to opt in and out from blip using MediaRSS.
-Original
Thanks Carl!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, CarLBanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That looks awesome Enric!
On 1/4/07, RANDY MANN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thats averry cool player enric.
how can i use that
randy
On 1/3/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] enric%40cirne.com
I should have it available within two to three weeks (or earlier) on
my vpip site. I'll put a post up here when it's ready. First I want
to make the vPIP code more modular and object oriented so it can be
more easily extended.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, RANDY MANN [EMAIL
looks like any blip related search yields nothing
but some videos still exist
like from direct links:
*http://tinyurl.com/y54hcd*
maybe they're just in the process of fixing this all
but the search seems purged
On 1/4/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a case for
On a related note, how can 3rd parties go about accessing the creative
commons or copyright licence attached to blip.tv videos? Im afraid I
havent studied this to see what blip already does, is the cc stuff
included in the blip RSS feed, or through an API if you offer one?
And thanks again,
Yes, my search for cirne came up empty. Looks like they removed
both my blip.tv and Google Video entries. Yes!
not so simple.
i assume they are still working on it.
A search on MyHeavy brings back no results of any of the videos off of Blip.
http://www.myheavy.com/search
But my deep links
Rhett,
I envision you reading this as a statement from behind a podium.
What if we all made solid articulate speeches, in a standard,
'mainstream' media environment. It should be easy for us to put
together a podium and some decent lighting to at least replicate a
'mainstream' standard of
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, my search for cirne came up empty. Looks like they removed
both my blip.tv and Google Video entries. Yes!
not so simple.
i assume they are still working on it.
A search on MyHeavy brings back no results
Do we know how much revenue they generated dsirectly from blip
google videos? Do we know how long they had the 'search engine' aspect
of their site running before it got pulled down?
I support you on one level with what you are suggesting, but there are
several hurdles Id think carefully before
Thats a technical issue. Those links arent really static links. The
video.php file is clearly designed to take a url from the bit after
the ? in the url. I could put a link to any video there and it would work.
Hmm I think I fudged that explanation. Your videos arent really living
on their
I have an emac with an iMage webcam and videocue pro. I am 65 years olds. I
have some
postcards that I wan to put on vblogs. WHAT IS THE BEST WAY TO HOLD THEM UP TO
WEBCAM SO SHAKING IS CUT DOWN I AM NEW TO THING GROUP AND MY COMPUTER IS
LOCKED INTO CAPS. As I show the cards I would read what
Thanks Steve. We do include the Creative Commons information in the RSS
feed.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Watkins
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:05 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
Hi all,
The french press is talking about MyHeavy
http://www.pointblog.com/past/2007/01/04/
myheavy_ne_respecte_pas_les_vloggers.htm
Pointblog is one of the most important blog in France
Nice day ;-)
Loiez
I doubt the direct links will be fixed because of the way the page
works. The URL includes all the information necessary to render the
page, without ever hitting the database.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ryanne hodson
See my earlier e-mail about this.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay dedman
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:48 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
Yes. We're meeting with them next week to figure out how they can do
this properly.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Enric
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:47 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
Greetings,
Id improvise with some sort of stand that you attach the postcards to,
or something you lean them against or stick them to. Then experiment
getting the right distance between the postcard and your camera.
Finally, experiment with your lighting in the room a bit so that the
postcards
I note with a small degree of amusement that Gmail is offering me
heavy.com - funny taylor hicks cartoon! ads.
While it would be wrong to click it a few times just to cost them some
marketing pocket-change, if anyone's sooo frustrated they just
need to let off some steam
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
The french press is talking about MyHeavy
http://www.pointblog.com/past/2007/01/04/
myheavy_ne_respecte_pas_les_vloggers.htm
Pointblog is one of the most important blog in France
Nice day ;-)
Loiez
One thing you could do would be to attach the postcard to a board and
then point the webcam at the board and take a picture.
That way there won't be any shaking.
While you're at it, put some light on the postcard.
BTW, here's a way to shut off caps lock.
On your mac, if you go to System
Mike Hudack wrote:
this would definitely be cool.
I could go into my Blip dhasboard and simply balcklist any
site I didnt want to link to me.
how complicated would this be on a user by user basis?
That is interesting. I'm going to noodle on this.
mod_rewrite would be an obvious way to do
Cheers for the info :) This means there is no technical barrier for
3rd parties to get this licence info from the same source they are
getting details of the video, which is great. So for example when
there was a hooha about network2.tv not showing the license details on
the page, they could get
Steve, I think that for the time being at least there's a manageable
group of worthwhile aggregation destinations, and it's possible for us
to offer opt-in and opt-out from them within the dashboard. Moving
forward we may go to a more freeform system, where we allow people to
opt-in or out based
Mike Hudack wrote:
They have disabled their aggregation functionality entirely for the time
being. I just got off the phone with their CEO, who was very contrite.
We'll be meeting with them next week to figure out how to do this right,
and allow people to opt in and out from blip using MediaRSS.
We're embedding two types of control metadata in our RSS right now.
First up is Creative Commons metadata using the creativeCommons
namespace:
creativeCommons:licensehttp://address.of.license/foo/bar//creativeCom
mons:license
Second is MediaRSS aggregation restriction:
media:restriction
Den 04.01.2007 kl. 16:20 skrev Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's correct. The problem is that we do want to be picky. We want to
allow people to use VPIP to play back videos hosted on blip, but we
don't want to allow them to use the MyHeavy player on MyHeavy.com
(unless it's the content
Interestingly I found at the top of diggs tech area a post that
relates to the issue with MyHeavy:
http://digg.com/tech_news/MySpace_Gets_Goatse_d
(Warning, goatse image linked in article)
The blog entry referred to is at:
http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/000278.html
In the blog article
Wow! Nice Enric. I'm debating on picking up a license for Flex 2.0
and charting to see what we can do w/ video in AS 3.0. Keep us
abreast this project...Very cool!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've made a custom version of vPIP for a customer,
Jay dedman wrote:
is there a link?
id like to know the reasoning behind the take down?
Licensing?
jay
Well the link was at http://www.carnoustiegolflinks.co.uk/vlog/ but as
you can see it's gone. I was asked to take it down by The Carnoustie
Golf Links after the Royal Ancient applied
I shall, thanks for the interest.
-- Enric
-==-
http://www.cirne.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, taulpaulmpls
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow! Nice Enric. I'm debating on picking up a license for Flex 2.0
and charting to see what we can do w/ video in AS 3.0. Keep us
Brilliant! (if a little strong, especially as many of the 'victims'
were innocent of direct evilhotlinking because it was really the
template designers fault).
Anyway I especially liked this sentiment from his blog entry:
Hotlinking in itself is not so bad, in my book. I certainly get
people
On a related note, how can 3rd parties go about accessing the creative
commons or copyright licence attached to blip.tv videos? Im afraid I
havent studied this to see what blip already does, is the cc stuff
included in the blip RSS feed, or through an API if you offer one?
This is a good
Thanks Mike!
On Jan 4, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Mike Hudack wrote:
Yup, it looks like they've cleaned their act up. I'm expecting a call
from their CEO in a few minutes, so I'm guessing that will be the
message he delivers.
--
Steve Garfield
http://SteveGarfield.com
Well theres a heck of a lot of money more than I guess 70 years of
formal study of PR etc. Concepts such as controlling the message and
selecting the 'public face of entity', and not letting people peer
behind the curtain, are deeply embedded in much of the commercial, and
indeed non-commercial
Been following this post. Fascinating stuff. Sull, Jay, Mike H,
Enric... and everyone who's posted you all rock!
I'm so glad we're getting beyond the knee jerk reaction and into the
nitty gritty.
I read every single comment in both threads... something like 140
comments. Riveting.
One thing
to discuss these very issues. It's time for the crowd to recommend
solutions. MyHeavy is now willing to play ball by your rules. Write
the rules. I'll convey them.
OK, the first rule is:
If you used content without permission of the owner you have to pay
the owner's asking price
Yes, I remember this group tried to tackle these issues I guess 18
months ago but it got bogged down by legal or overly technical
discussions, and the bottom line was that most people were powerless
to add this info to their feeds themseves, and need all the major
services to do it for them.
It's a really big Internet, and Heavy is much more concerned with the 17
year old boy sitting in front of his computer at 11 PM than they are
with you. How much influence do you have over that kid?
ahbut its a really small world.
Im sitting here in Silicon Valleyand trust me...if
I wanted to start a new thread.
Basically this is a discussion of where not only Myheavy.com went
wrong... but an opportunity to acknowlege and promote best practices
for proper re-vlogging. Mike Hudack is going to meet with MyHeavy.com
sometime in the next week or so and it would be nice if we
I can see where you are coming from with that sugestion, but it seems
a tad OTT to me and would possibly harm the ability of a concensus
forming around these 'rules'?
Another problem with it is the concept of using something 'without
permission'. At the heart of the abuses we have seen, is the
I'm interested in trying to develop better rules for scraping/linking off
of sites like MySpace, YouTube, or Google Video. These sites seem to
generally have and show information on who uploaded a given
video...perhaps this is a good way to contact the creator and minimally
inform them they're
comments below
On 1/4/07, johnleeke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to discuss these very issues. It's time for the crowd to recommend
solutions. MyHeavy is now willing to play ball by your rules. Write
the rules. I'll convey them.
OK, the first rule is:
If you used content without
I like your old guide, it may not need all that much of an update,
need to hear from more creators on this, theres a hardcore who like to
talk about these rights issues in depth, but many more who are angry
enough to join in once a violation has occured, but for a multitude of
valid reasons dont
Ahh theres a big problem with number 4. It defeats a large chunks of
the rights you are giving with any of the creative commons licenses.
To the best of my knowledge the CC licences give people the right to
copy, distribute, display, and perform your work providing they
stick to the other rules
How it works in the courts...
I did a bit of research as to how it works in the courts.
There are 2 main parts:
1) Did they violate someone's copyright? (YES in this case)
2) Were there damages to the copyright holder?
If the 2 conditions are met, the court then decides an appropriate
Den 04.01.2007 kl. 23:18 skrev cooper3acd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How it works in the courts...
I did a bit of research as to how it works in the courts.
There are 2 main parts:
1) Did they violate someone's copyright? (YES in this case)
2) Were there damages to the copyright holder?
If the 2
Following on from that point, heres some exceptionally clear stuff
from the creative commons site:
http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/fullrights
All Creative Commons licenses have many important features in common.
Every license will help you
* retain your copyright
* announce
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
