around the 26/1/07 Erin Nealey mentioned about [videoblogging] Does
anyone use .mac for their video podcas that:
So I guess I'm asking for thoughts on this. Does anyone on here use
their .mac account / iDisk for their videos and what is your
experience with this and is there an advantage. Thus
test post (having problems getting posts to show up.)
-- Enric
This coming Saturday, 1/27/06, FlashMeeting is set. The time for
entry is 10am - noon PST USA, 1pm - 3pm EST USA, 18:00-20:00 GMT.
Enter through this link:
http://flashmeeting.open.ac.uk/fm/4d32c7-7150
You may also check the Videoblogger Videoconferences page at
voxmedia for future and past
This coming Saturday, 1/27/06, FlashMeeting is set. The time for
entry is 10am - noon PST USA, 1pm - 3pm EST USA, 18:00-20:00 GMT.
Enter through this link:
http://flashmeeting.open.ac.uk/fm/4d32c7-7150
You may also check the Videoblogger Videoconferences page at
voxmedia for future and past
Liz Gannes at NewTeeVee reports that YouTube CEO Chad Hurley said
today his company (now owned by Google) is going to move in [the]
direction of rewarding video creators for their content, as part of a
panel discussion at the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos.:
http://tinyurl.com/268fju
or
http://youtube.com/watch?v=aqN-3A9_QwA
or
http://tinyurl.com/39yljr
A very interesting thing going on with all of the Web 2.0 people.
Meetups, gatherings, Barcamps... award shows.
It is very fun to go to these events and meet other people with
interests similar to yours. Conversations cary for
With magnify.net, I think opt-in is much better.
With all these aggregator sites as well, I'd love to have my CC license
displayed as well since it shows up in Blip's RSS feed as well.
Anyway this can happen?
I'd love to get these guys in here so we could talk to them directly.
Jay
Gromik,
Here's a link that might help
http://www.apple.com/itunes/store/podcaststechspecs.html
... Richard
On 1/24/07, Gromik Tohoku [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Videobloggers,
At the moment I am trying to learn to podcast via
iTunes. This morning, I followed the freevlog video
Are we seriously okay with opt-out? A thousand aggregators take your
material and use it however they want. Does anyone have the time to
sift the net and sift those sites to ensure your material is being
used as you have licensed it to be used? A CC, non-commercial
license means you have to
Yeah - get 'em all in for a videoconference. :)
A long one.
Jan
On 1/26/07, Jay Dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With magnify.net, I think opt-in is much better.
With all these aggregator sites as well, I'd love to have my CC license
displayed as well since it shows up in Blip's RSS feed as
www.videodl.org and media-convert.com might help. videodl.org
returns the address to the actual file. media-convert will convert
it.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 1/26/07, Philip Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are two websites that
Thanks for sharing the news Enric. Here's a transcript of what he
said:
In terms of paying users revenue against the content that they're
uploading, we're definitely going to move in that direction. But we
didn't want to build a system that was motivated by monetary reward.
We wanted to
They are absolutely going to do this.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Watson
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 9:19 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] MyHeavy and Magnify and
any vloggers going to sundance ?
Thi is a challenge : would you vlog this artist and send me your
footgae ?
http://gasprod.blip.tv/file/138144/
thx
gabriel soucheyre
--
VIDEOFORMES vidéo et nouveaux médias dans l'art contemporain
www.videoformes.com
BP 50 -64, rue Lamartine
thnxz David
www.videodl.org is the best one ..in my case-I live in China and the
internet service has been worse..since the shake near taiwantill now... so
choppy that it has been a pain in the to watch a complete movie -clip from
any site...
but with videodl.org...I just
I guess this depends on exactly what we mean by opt-out. Clearly the
rages against various sites shows that being asked to opt-out of
something we may not even know exists, is no good.
But most of the recent opt-out stuff, has been related to blip.tv.
This is different because it only applies to
Alternatively its because they are about to try to open up an
advertising revenue stream through their service, and know that they
have to be careful with this and at a minimum make a token gesture
that the creators who make the site what it is will get a piece of
that pie?
Ive no idea what
Thanks for your thoughts Steve. Your faith in blip is understandable
and I share it: they've been remarkably good brokers and advocates
for this community. As I hope I communicated, my concerns are not
about blip. Quite the contrary, I think they're doing everything
they can to empower us.
Perian.org looks like its for Mac OS X only.
Here's a site that I don't think was mentioned that can convert FLV to
other video formats:
http://vixy.net/flv_converter
-Josh
On 1/26/07, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah what Phillip said.
http://perian.org/
i think it might be against
It is fascinating to read between the lines and learn business
diplomacy from Mike.
I agree with David, when it comes to the legality and morality of the
issue, opt out simply empowers the illegal and immoral actions of
these secondary agrigators and distributors of our content. They want
and
I have settled on MovieMaker because I want to be using a vlogging
system that I can recommend to my colleagues who want to get into it,
so it must have these characteristics: no cost, readily available,
easily usable. (unfortunately it does not have MOV output.)
I used AvidDV for a while, which
John,
I'm going to reply to David directly in just a moment. I'd just like to
point out that my ability to discuss the particular case of Magnify
right now is fairly limited since negotiations with Magnify are ongoing
and I don't want to jeopardize those conversations. It's kind of like
lawyers
Cheers, though I feel we are ever so slightly talking at
cross-purposes and misunderstanding eachother on a couple of details,
but not the main issues.
Im basically saying that although it seems straightforward, the term
'non-commercial' is subject to interpretation. Im not saying that
creative
I'm going to respond to each e-mail in this thread individually, or at
least try to. Before doing that, though, I'd like to ensure that we
have clarity around our terms, particularly the difference between
opt-in and opt-out. These are terms of art that originated in the
e-mail marketing space
I think part of the confusion was because you accidentally used the
terms the wrong way round when talking about Magnify the other day
You will be able to control
aggregation
to Magnify through a control panel in the blip.tv Dashboard.
Because of
Magnify's current position on
The problem that we have right now is that in some ways we're playing a
game of whack-a-mole. As sites like Veoh, MyHeavy and Magnify come to
our attention we have approached them and worked to solve the problem
presented by their behavior. There are lots of other sites out there,
and they'll
That would SO do it. And to think I had Charles proofread that e-mail
before I sent it out!
So, yeah, apologies for that. Our current thinking is to make Magnify
opt-in, rather than opt-out.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
I'm working on the CC license. I believe that with MyHeavy we're going
to go to a system in which they don't aggregate anything that's been
marked with a non-commercial CC license. This is still up to some
discusison, though, since we will be offering blip.tv users the ability
to opt in or out
There's some stuff in here that I'd rather not answer, simply because it
comes especially close to blip's core business strategy and every single
one of our competitors (current or future, real or imagined) hangs out
on this list and lurks. Suffice it to say that I generally agree with
your
I don't want to apply opt-out to an aggregator unless they agree to
abide by this community's definition of best practices and actually do
so. Under these circumstances, and these circumstances alone, should an
aggregator be placed in a privileged position such as opt-out.
Otherwise the
Yes, Liz has a prior article on Google Video Transitions to Video
Search with only YouTube for video hosting. And providing video for
AdSense customers:
We'll be working with a wide set of content providers, grouping
together high quality video content from providers with high quality
ads and
A default position of opt-out is one of the most powerful negotiating
tools I have in my arsenal, and it allows me to tell a company that I
can give them access to a great library of content if they'll follow the
rules.
+1. And thanks for spending all this time on this Mike, it's important.
In an article on NewTeeVee, Jackson West writes about Fox using the
DMCA to get details on the users who uploaded episodes of 24. Jackson
goes on to write:
'What nobody seems to be pointing out is that Fox's parent, News Corp,
is in direct competition with Google and YouTube thanks to MySpace
I'm having trouble following and contributing to this discussion
because the posts aren't showing up in any order I can determine.
Seriously. Weird.
Anyway, Mike, please don't feel it necessary to respond to my earlier
posts. You've explained that the opt-out/opt-in that you're
I think we're in 100% agreement.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 12:40 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy and Magnify and
aggregators in
Meeting in progress. Come on by.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This coming Saturday, 1/27/06, FlashMeeting is set. The time for
entry is 10am - noon PST USA, 1pm - 3pm EST USA, 18:00-20:00 GMT.
Enter through this link:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem that we have right now is that in some ways we're playing a
game of whack-a-mole. As sites like Veoh, MyHeavy and Magnify come to
our attention we have approached them and worked to solve the problem
The web space could not exist with opt out.
The search space fundamentally would not exist if it were opt out.
Our job is not to figure out the best standards for opt-in... indeed
there need be no standard on opt-in at all...
Our job is to figure out the minimum standards for opt in, so this
OK the BBC seem to have got more detail on this, the story is
currently a main headline on their UK news site...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6305957.stm
Important new info includes:
The system would be rolled out in a couple of months, he said, and
use a mixture of adverts, including
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is the value ads that must be opt in. I.E. if myheavy or magnify
want to put ads on your content that should be opt in.
Peace,
-Mike
mefeedia.com
mmeiser.com/blog
+1. If the TTL of the options we select when
We are at Sundance right now and just spent a long, tiring day yesterday
trying to get here, get the feel of the town, meet some people, and fail
miserably at getting a ticket via a waitlist. I stayed up late into the
night on an editing session of VERY rough footage, and the post is
uploading
I posted a brief and personal history of videoblogging:
http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/
Now let's see yours
Peter
--
Find 1s of videoblogs and podcasts at http://mefeedia.com
my blog: http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/
my job: http://petervandijck.net
So what is our community's standard of best practices that an aggregator is
held against?
What do you tell these businesses when you're in their board room?
Jay
-Original Message-
From: Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:02:34
To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Since we're using this list to publicly discuss these relationships between a
video hosting site and aggregatorsit'd be good if we all defined what we
expect when someone uses ouir videos.
Jay
-Original Message-
From: Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007
That was really cool!
I agree, these meetups are a big part of the vlogging experience for
me; I've met some very special people and gotten some very strange
experiences from doing this.
The page mentioned a meetup happening next month here in SF. I may go
and ask them why YouTube as opposed to
I've edited in MovieMaker and Roxio VideoWave, output raw AVI, and then
compress using QuickTime Pro. (I also use Sorenson Squeeze to compress in
FLV and SWF).
On 1/27/07, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryanne and I are working on some new tutorials for Freevlog. One of
the most
I think theres been several concerted efforts to do that in the last
month or so. I didnt think that quite a wide enough range of people
fully contributed to the debate, but thats easy for me to say as I
clearly have more hours than is healthy to talk about this stuff.
Its certainly a lot easier
Absolutely. I've been working from the discussions we've had on this
list previously, including the best practices document that you, me and
Bre put together during the Veoh catastrophe and with the draft I've put
up on videovertigo.org at
http://videovertigo.org/information/aggregation/, which
Chad Hurley says that YouTube is working on some kind of revenue-sharing
scheme. Wired News has details -
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/W/WORLD_FORUM_YOUTUBE?SITE=WIRESECTION=HOMETEMPLATE=DEFAULTCTIME=2007-01-27-10-10-20
--
Andrew
Creative Director, The World's Angriest Puppets
Email:
YouTube has introduced new features this week, including a different,
google-ized, search
http://www.youtube.com/blog?entry=9_wU0qhEPR8
What Ive observed is that the improved search function appears to have
totally wrecked the related clip menu on YouTube pages. Only the most banal
of
More on that here..
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070127/D8MTOAFO0.html
Curious to see the model.
Tony Katz
http://www.talkshowonthego.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chad Hurley says that YouTube is working on some kind of revenue-sharing
I'm a carer in a disabled people's home in the UK. The folks I care
for would like me to set up a website for them so that they can upload
videos and share experinces (similar to You tube).
Could you advise how I could do this? I'm reasonably proficient with
computers and programming. Are there
Hello Mike,
Thanks for all your good work, and this arrangement sounds reasonable
and appropriate. You definitely where a white hat.
Now, maybe you can help me with some Hollywood business.
All the best
Daniel McVicar
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using Virtual Hub to convert flv to .mov It even batch
converts, if you are mashing up a bunch of videos, its a nice feature.
http://www.techspansion.com/visualhub/
hope that helps
Schlomo
http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
http://hatfactory.net
http://evilvlog.com
On 1/26/07, Lucas
virtualhub is actually quite good, i agree.
On 1/27/07, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using Virtual Hub to convert flv to .mov It even batch
converts, if you are mashing up a bunch of videos, its a nice feature.
http://www.techspansion.com/visualhub/
hope that
hi,
there are several youtube clone scripts you could buy and bind to a hosting
package that does flv transcoding.
do a google search for youtube clone or something like that.
dont know your budget or skills, but if using youtube or blip etc is not
good enough for your project, then this could
Hi everyone,
I was just curious if anyone else vlogged from today's big antiwar
protest in DC. I was there with Carl Weaver, and I know a few other
vloggers were there, including Jonny Goldstein and Jill Foster. Here's
my video from the event; I managed to get footage of Sean Penn and a few
Guys,
Our first Sundance video is stalled from being released because of a
critical issue that I don't know how to fix! I bought us a new mic to
use on the road...it's a handheld Shure that uses an XLR input. I step
that down to the 1/8 plug on the camera.
The audio sounds beautiful in the can
Not in DC but in L.A. - I'm editing it now and hope to have it up by
tomorrow. The event in L.A. was a meeting of many different groups to
support the protest and activities in D.C.
Later,
Gena
http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com
http://pcclibtech.blogspot.com
http://voxmedia.org/wiki/Video
On 1/27/07, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even accepting reality for what it is, however, there are
many good reasons to continue to push for our rights as creators to
be sacrosanct.
The problem is that videobloggers are going down the same hopelessly
unrealistic and ultimately disastrous
Hi Rhett --
Sounds like phase cancellation to me. Simply put, when the polarity
is reversed on one channel of a stereo recording, and the recording
is summed to mono, then the peaks of one waveform coincide with the
valleys of the other waveform and they wind up cancelling each other
out.
Your problem is probably that you're using a mono mic with a mono plug
and plugging it into a stereo jack on your camera. That mono mic is
feeding both your left and right stereo channels.
You don't actually have stereo since you can't get stereo from a
mono mic with a mono XLR output. You have
Bright Cove currently offers this functionality, but their interface seems
extremely slugish.
http://blog.brightcove.com/blog/2006/12/brightcoves_use.html
Solidarity,
~FluxRostrum
~
VLOG~FLUX
http://FluxRostrum.BlogSpot.com
~~~
http://GlassBeadCollective.org
~~~
Old School
Philip,
Thanks for the very clear treatment of this information. I didn't know
so much about XLR phase inversion in the signal, but I had started to
figure that the problem was due to the way things were getting combined,
so I did a Fill From Left channel, and that had fixed it. Now I know
the
Dear Mothervloggers,
We hereby invite you to visit United Vloggers. For one month now we have
been fooling around and now it's time to spread the word. Who is we? We
is all of us who believe in the power of vlogging; in personalized,
subjective, outspoken, peculiar and compassionate stories, made
Pardon me, I made a typing mistake:
The right e-mail address is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yea! I'm glad you guys are doing this.
-Verdi
On 1/27/07, Milt Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vegas is really wonderful. You can get the vegas studio version which
is less complex, but honestly, Vegas is so intuitive - that people can
use it immediately. One of the best things about Vegas besides that
it is an absolute rock solid program
Im not sure Id agree that a sense of victimization or righteous anger
are the primary driving forces behind such things, but they are in the
mix somewhere when it comes to reactions of music etc industry. Ive
yet to see it from any vlogger in response to creative re-use of an
element of their
Expect Democracy Player version 0.9.5 to be released in the next week. New
features include
the ability to post easily to videobomb, del.icio.us, digg and reddit. The
interface has also
been redesigned to make it even simpler. Keep your eye on getdemocracy.com to
get a hold
of it. The
There are separate issues here.
1) is the CC license - and yes people want attribution. It's a fairly
common human trait and in itself does not stifle creativity. And of
course, all of this creativity comes from somewhere - it is my big
picture belief that from way out there it all belongs to all
Vidiac offers the same functionality. Go to signup.vidiac.com and
setup your own video sharing site in about 5 minutes. You can setup
name.vidiac.com or videos.domain.com and skin it to match your site.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ~ FluxRostrum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bright Cove
Second Life Debate Performance
8pm - 11pm, Free
Muse Arena, Muse Isle, Second Life
For the most updated info, check:
http://www.mgchicago.com/v2/festival/07/secondlife.php
Following up on last year's amazing video conferencing event, this
year we invite you to log in from anywhere with a
On 1/26/07, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the most often asked questions is how to compress quicktime movies
from various PC editing programs
This is how I do it:
http://mirror.video.blip.tv/Icenryevlog-ConvertingVideoForIPod886.mov
Cheers!
Shel.
--
www.icenrye.com
maybe try one of these:
http://pando.com/
http://www.yousendit.com/
http://box.net/
http://encodable.com/filechucker/
On 1/25/07, Milt Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI folks, I wanted to see if anybody here has set up a page for people
to upload videos. I'm trying to get a sense of what it
75 matches
Mail list logo
