jill neglected to mention she helped organize the
YouTube nyc party this past summer sponsored by
nextnewnetworks and blip
she was also shown on iCaught, that wierd show on television LOL
On 9/18/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Jill. :)
You'll want to join The New York City
Sweet! Sweet that you contribute to your community.
Welcome to the vlogosphere, Jill.
Jan
On 9/19/07, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jill neglected to mention she helped organize the
YouTube nyc party this past summer sponsored by
nextnewnetworks and blip
she was also shown on iCaught,
Hey all,
In my last post here (*http://tinyurl.com/3ch2az)*, I wrote about public
service vlogging. Thanks for all the responses - I will make a post on
dltq.org about PSV soon as well as a follow-up message in here.
In the meantime, I have decided to once again jump into political
videoblogging
My bad...a few of you let me know that the download link was not
working. And shame on me for spelling Rocketboom wrong. Sorry Drew.
Forgive me?
All's been corrected.
Thanks,
Leesa Barnes
http://www.leesabarnes.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, leesarbarnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am in California now, and had the time to write a post about something
that is on my mind for a long time now. I think that when we call ourselves
Internet TV creators, we are setting expectations that we can't meet. I
tried to add more depth to the issue here:
Come join me on justin.tv and help me get closer to iJustine http://
www.justin.tv/evilvlog
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
For me, calling it Internet TV is setting the bar too LOW. Other than the
fact that series work is possible on the web (not something previously
limited to TV) and that moving images in a box are involved, I don't see how
it has much to do with TV at all. I sometimes call it web cinema, but that's
I am in California now, and had the time to write a post about something
that is on my mind for a long time now. I think that when we call ourselves
Internet TV creators, we are setting expectations that we can't meet. I
tried to add more depth to the issue here:
repost from Kfir's site.
I use .TV in my sites, because it's the recognized professional suffix
for video sites. Other than that, I don't think I've ever referred to
video on the internet as internet TV, merely because it was never ON
TV. Yes, there are opportunities for Tivo and Apple TV
Jan McLaughlin, this is a reminder for
Title: 35 Live
Time: Wed Sep 19 17:00 - 23:00 (Eastern Time)
Calendar: Jan McLaughlin
You can view this event at
When I click the link I get no info on what this is...
I know about the live show at 7 but what are you linking us to?
On Sep 19, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Google Calendar wrote:
Jan McLaughlin, this is a reminder for
Title: 35 Live
Time: Wed Sep 19 17:00 - 23:00 (Eastern Time)
Calendar: Jan
Production values are more about people and skill than equipment, and skills
can be learned. Including color correction, editing, cinematography,
mixing. You can't do that crane shot through the window continuing out the
other side of the high rise without big money, insurance, and the right
Rocketbook, pocketbook, pocketboom all the same.
Pocketbook? A Philly thing.
--- leesarbarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My bad...a few of you let me know that the download
link was not
working. And shame on me for spelling Rocketboom
wrong. Sorry Drew.
Forgive me?
All's been corrected.
A local St. Louis video blogger, Antonio French, has had all his
videos pulled from YouTube after a Local TV station sent a take down
notice to YouTube. The video they sent the take down notice was a
report that he had posted where they promised a follow up to a story
about an alderman on the
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A local St. Louis video blogger, Antonio French, has had all his
videos pulled from YouTube after a Local TV station sent a take down
notice to YouTube. The video they sent the take down notice was a
report that
Important to note that this isn't so much a problem with YouTube as it is a
problem with THE LAW, which blip and everyone else also has to deal with.
Copyright infringement is your best entertainment value ---Negativland
___
Brook Hinton
Amen, Brook.
Production values are about time, people and skills, not money.
Look at pretty much any TV show - soap, cooking, property, reality
tv, etc... even in 99% of TV Drama, technically there is *nothing*
that we cannot now reproduce or improve upon with very cheap
equipment
[i'm not sure, maybe this is a silly question]: do you know why we don't
hear about this take-down procedures in relation to blip?
thank, friends.
On 9/19/07, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Important to note that this isn't so much a problem with YouTube as it
is a
problem with THE
Well I agree that there are problems with the law, especially the
DMCA, but really with this issue specifically it's not the law that
is the problem, it's the way it's implemented and enforced. Fair Use
is the law too, but it often gets pushed aside or over looked by
over zelous enforcement of
I really love this discussion. It seems that we focusing, at least in some
cases, in looking into production value. Maybe production value can be
mitigated with a wider experience? Meaning, maybe we can create a wider
interaction with the viewers, that will compensate our lack of ability to
reach
Live by YouTube, die by YouTube. More food for thought that
maintaining your own URL is more important than trying to succeed on
sites where you have no formal business relationship with.
-Kent, askaninja.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A
Especially since setting up your own Videoblogging site is getting
easier and easier.
(For example... now, it's fairly easy to do with WordPress with Show in a Box.)
See ya
On 9/19/07, Kent Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Live by YouTube, die by YouTube. More food for thought that
A guess as to why we don't hear about this take-down procedures in
relation to blip?
Blip doesn't figure in any of the reports about market share for top
video providers. Myspace, Youtube, Yahoo, Google get a mention, but
never Blip. Lawyers are too busy working to know that there are any
he should be able to send an email to Youtube outlining that it is
fair use and they may re-enstate the video's. It has happened
before, the big thing with the DMCA is, even though they (being the
hosting provider) has to take something down no questions asked, if
it proven the request is in
Amen right back, Rupert!
Kfir, I think the point Rupert and I are both making is that there doesn't
NEED to be a lack of ability re production value. The tools are no longer
out of reach, and you can learn the skills. So why conpensate/mitigate? As
an aside, traditional production values aren't
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amen, Brook.
Production values are about time, people and skills, not money.
Look at pretty much any TV show - soap, cooking, property, reality
tv, etc... even in 99% of TV Drama, technically there is *nothing*
My Prince lip-sync video (not unlike Vlog Deathmatch videos) was taken down
from YouTube a few weeks ago. Since then I have not put it on Blip because I
would rather not see them added to the list of folks being sued these days.
Veoh is being sued as well as of earlier this month.
Because of
You're right, Bill - but given the right circumstances, people's time
can be valued very differently from how it would be valued if it's
thought of in terms of its dollar value, and in terms of it being
*instead of* work.
We're all hypnotized by the idea of cash money as currency and time
When the lawyers, etc., find out about Blip I'm sure they
will point their minions at it as well. There are companies that do
nothing but search YouTube all day looking for infringing videos. From what
I gather from an article I read, these people aren't particularly skilled at
One more point from me - I think the concept of Internet TV will be
more appropriate when we are all consuming our online video from our
couch, on our TVs. That's where we're headed, and quite soon.
It'll feel more like TV because it'll be consumed though a TV, and
more suited to being
So as its been said, Youtube isnt really the bad boy here...they are
just saving their own ass from law suitsquick to screw creators.
It would be interesting to see Youtube and other big video sites
actually stand up and help define fair use.
blip actually makes their process very clear:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come join me on justin.tv and help me get closer to iJustine http://
www.justin.tv/evilvlog
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
iSaw iHer iFirst
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come join me on justin.tv and help me get closer to iJustine http://
www.justin.tv/evilvlog
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hi all,
This is the first time I post here, though I've been reading for months. I've
really been enjoying the discussion lately.
I'm doing some research on Internet Television, specifically the Documentary
genre. I'd like to ask all of you:
Who are your favorite internet documentary
Hey! Is this the link?
Also not sure I am on time/in sync.
I am NOT being a smart ass. Show starts at 9;00PM EST
General info share. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/24-hour_clock
1700 is 5:00pm
1800 is 6:00pm
2000 is 8:00pm
2100 is 9:00pm
2300 is 11:00pm
2400 is Midnight
The
Hey! Is this the link?
http://www.synchronis.tv/
Also not sure I am on time/in sync.
I am NOT being a smart ass. Show starts at 9;00PM EST
General info share. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/24-hour_clock
1700 is 5:00pm
1800 is 6:00pm
2000 is 8:00pm
2100 is 9:00pm
2300 is 11:00pm
2400 is
.As an aside, traditional production values aren't even necessarily the
best ones for web video in the first place. From my perspective we should be
creating new visual languages, new ways of conveying exploring and
communicating..
Brook - I can't agree more with this portion of your response.
I suggested they improve their home page to better explain when the
show starts and where to watch.
Right now it's not so clear.
On Sep 19, 2007, at 7:29 PM, bordercollieaustralianshepherd wrote:
Hey! Is this the link?
http://www.synchronis.tv/
Also not sure I am on time/in sync.
I
It would be so much easier to drop time altogether, but that ain't
gonna happen until the Zydridites fro Glyphixz ...
and lets all stop pretending daylight savings time does anything but
confuse.
In the links section you will find:
_ GMT Greenwich Mean Time
GMT Greenwich Mean Time converter
USTREAM LINK is BROKEN too
http://www.synchronis.tv/www.ustream.tv/channel/35--a-scripted-live-
webisode
Should be:
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/35--a-scripted-live-webisode
On Sep 19, 2007, at 8:12 PM, Steve Garfield wrote:
It's fixed, now says:
“35″ premieres tonight!
September 19,
It's pretty dorky to put a link on your website front page to a live
show that starts in a matter of hours, and then not even check the
link to make sure it's right!!! DUH! (And a mistake we've all made).
They've done such a professional job at promoting this thing and
getting pre-press.
It's fixed, now says:
“35″ premieres tonight!
September 19, 2007 – 7:47 pm
Tune in right here to watch the premiere episode of “35″…or
visit us over at ustream.tv
---
But that's still a little confusing since the date stamp on the blog
post looks like the time that the video is going to
One place you can watch is Jonny's Par-tay at 9PM Eastern. I'm going
to embed the ustream in the Par-tay webpage with a chatroom
underneath, then after the 10 minute episode, we'll keep talking. If
you have a webcam and an operator11.com account, I'll try to put you
on camera. If not, you can let
Hey Thanks Steve. I am still confused as a dog on a plane.
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/35--a-scripted-live-webisode grabbed
the URL from UStream. The banner for 35 reads 9PM Eastern Standard time.
Can't miss that sweet audio and creamy colors. This does present a bit
of a dilemma though.
Is the video back up anywhere that we can see what all the fuss is about?
Reads like fair use. The station has used his videos on their
newscasts. Now that's Damning evidence. or Damn, that is evidence.
What I did see that I do not recall in other cases is that YouTube's
takedown notice where
I liked it a lot!
I liked it a bunch too. If ya missed the debut of 35 you can check
it out, along with our jonny's par-tay post mortem at
http://tinyurl.com/2t24ru
next week: drew olanoff of http://scriggity.com/
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, bordercollieaustralianshepherd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Yeah, Jan and I were talking during Tuesday's FlashMeeting about some of the
website's needs. It was unclear whether the webcast would be presented at
synchronis.tv or at ustream.tv. Anyway, I started at ustream tonight but
then switched right over to synchronis.tv and it presented there very
What organizations are doing highly innovative stuff with political
videoblogging? Where are the case studies or at least links to current best
practice?
i dont think there are good examples for what you're talking about.
all ive seen are things like this: http://www.foodbattle.org/
its
Hmm... I have talked to my library a time or two about creating issue
casts - you know, go bug all the local mayorial candidates, ask them to
talk about one issue for 1-2 minutes, then schmush them all together into
one video, and put it up on our library's website.
Cool way to be fair
I've been meaning to thank all of you who've participated in the
FlashMeeting sessions these past couple of weeks. Since taking over
the moderation responsibilities, we've had visits from a variety of
videobloggers, including:
John Leeke, sharing his homeworking (de)construction ( on view at
51 matches
Mail list logo
