The real world isn't black and white, even if we'd like it to be. There
are varying degrees of regulation. Some regulation can be good.
Stifling regulation is rarely, if ever, good. Pink unicorns may have
managed to bring us a chocolate river while some regulation existed, but
you'd be
Sorry I've not been around much (mainly lurking) but I am working on a
video project right now that needs some disaster footage, think
hurricanes, tornadoes, blizzards, extreme weather conditions... Also
looking for some good city-scape stuff, lots of building in a big city.
If anyone
ok i have been fowwloing this thread for a while now, there are good
aurgments on both sides of the isues.
i do realy see one big flaw in your info mation.
out of all the research i have done on this (google,talking to the people in
the know) ill give you the facts .
there are no pink unicons, (i
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what kind of project is this for?
I hope I hope I hope this guy's project is an indie answer to
Cloverfield. :)
Chris
I don't think the rules are different at all. If someone quoted me in
text, out of context, and to support something I find repellent, I
would point it out. Same goes for images, same for video.
Asking to have a link (or other part of a conversation) removed is a
little extreme, but is sometimes
-Original Message-
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 19-Jan-08 16:14
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Disaster footage
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what kind of project is this for?
I hope I hope I hope this
-Original Message-
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 19-Jan-08 16:14
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Disaster footage
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what kind of project is this for?
I hope I hope I hope this
Kfir, I'm not seeing anything in the body of either of the messages
you sent...
Chris
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Kfir Pravda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 19-Jan-08 16:14
Subject:
check out this: http://www.spoonch.tv/
a smart use of twitter.
--
http://pepa.tv
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I'm curious about ChipIn, since I see a few people on here are using it.
Is it pretty reliable? I've tried to visit the site a few times today,
but was only able to access it briefly.
Thanks,
Chris
chip in rocks! i've used them for the past year and whenever i've had
hickups, they've patted my back and fed me warm milk.
good people, good product. oh, and they are drupalistas which in my
book is a good cookie to have.
:* = cookie in beard.
noneck
--
join me on a trip around the world!
That's endorsement enough for me! Thanks, Noel.
Chris
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, noel hidalgo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chip in rocks! i've used them for the past year and whenever i've had
hickups, they've patted my back and fed me warm milk.
good people, good product. oh, and
Excatlyhe didn't make it clear and that whole thing has really
got me thinking about the overall practice of just linking willy
nilly... it's got me thinking about context, it's got me thinking
how people view it, how they don't view it, etcit's just got me
thinking...
Heath
13 matches
Mail list logo
