I was just curious what people thought about the file sizes of their
video's or the video's that they subscribe too, download, etc. Do you
look at the file size often, does it matter if it's big or not? by big
I say over 50 mb. I know some of the size of your video file is
dependent on how
Have you had any experience with
trafficgeyser.com
It is a service with a monthly fee to get your videos at the top of
Google results.
John Leeke
www.HistoricHomeWorks.com
I have had no problem with QT 7.4...but maybe that's because I am
running Leopard and FCP 5.1. While I have not upgraded the FCP suite
to the latest version, I have experienced no problems with either QT
or FCP for a long time. I would also disagree with the statement that
Apple's service
comments below
On Feb 4, 2008 6:58 AM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Jay, is this an offer to develop it?
I would be very happy to contribute feedback, design, CSS, light
coding / anything I can just as long as it's either a) open source, or
b) I have some stake in the entity
Thanks for the warning. I'm using Quicktime 7.3. I also did NOT
upgrade to Leopard.
It's important to understand that these groups don't work together.
For instance, when they come out with a quicktime upgrade, they don't
check through every single possiblity of what could happen with Final
Rural areas are a concern, I would agree, but again, you can only
compress so much and sometimes you are fighting goverment regulation
as in the case of china, so I am not sure what can be done about
situations like that.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
[EMAIL
Make good videos. people will watch.
Use service to get people to watch your videos is the absolute wrong way
to go about it.
Jim Kukral
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 2:05 PM
To:
I think it would need someone who can develop it to do a protype of
the idea in it's most simple form, a proof of concept.
-Mike
On Feb 4, 2008 11:42 AM, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldnt say it is that easy, a really intuitive system will need more
thought in this area
than
Let me see if I can give you a useful answer...
In the US, at least at the moment, most people have broadband
connections without monthly dowmload limits. So the size of the file
is less of a concern especially if people are using aggregators like
iTunes or Miro to download video. Where it
Sure...because nobody ever made good videos but suffered from a lack of
promotion.
Making good videos and assuming the world will beat a path to your door is
like opening a restaurant without advertising it. Good food or not,
nobody knows you're there.
--
Rhett.
Does anybody have some standardized text for a release form?
I'm just going to go with the WP Release form plugin and need some
legalese to plug in there.
I will be dealing with small, local bands, and feel comfortable with
this kind of arrangement, but I definitely need some better legalese
I know that feeling, Irina. At this point, I'm pretty much the
spokesperson for public transit in L.A.
The project I just started is out in Reseda (I'm in North Hollywood),
which means a 45 minute bus ride and 20 minutes of walking there, and
the same back.
Thankfully, my actors this time have
So Jay, is this an offer to develop it?
I would be very happy to contribute feedback, design, CSS, light
coding / anything I can just as long as it's either a) open source, or
b) I have some stake in the entity building it. I'm just sick of
helping unappreciative companies / people build
Unless you only care about rich people in large urban metro areas, then
yes, file sizes do matter.
- Andreas
Den 04.02.2008 kl. 09:44 skrev Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was just curious what people thought about the file sizes of their
video's or the video's that they subscribe too, download,
Hey everybody,
I was wondering if any of you could point me in the direction of a
good, simple permission form for music usage for our videoblog and
also for public access TV.
Cheers,
Ron Watson
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://k9disc.com
http://discdogradio.com
http://pawsitivevybe.com
The point I was trying to make was.
If you make good videos, people will watch. But yeah, you do need promotion.
However, finding a tool that will help people find your videos sounds
bit spammy and wrong.
Tubemogul just helps you get them up, and now gives you some extra non
spammy ways to
7.4 also breaks renders over 10 minutes long (that's rendering time,
not project time) in After Effects, and misc. problems have been
reported with pre-FCPStudio2 Apple Pro products as well, though its
the After Effects problem that is significant. Workaround if you
already upgraded is to install
I wouldnt say it is that easy, a really intuitive system will need more thought
in this area
than we normally see. Sure, at its most basic its not that hard, but Id sure
like to see some
attempts to experiment more with how multiple videos are presented visually,
see if there
is room to
hey ron!
I am happy to forward you the release I used for my postcast question
of the week, it was a man on the street interview show and I got
clearance for everyone... just want to stress that a lawyer did not
write it, I cobbled together a template I bought and a few releases I
found,
I don't know.. I think making good videos is definitely
necessary... but you still need to get people to come to your site
somehow.
SEO can help get them there. (Of course once they're there, your
_good_ videos will hopefully keep them coming back.)
Not that SEO is the only strategy for
From what I've heard of TubeMogul, it seem like a useful
service But does TubeMogul provide SEO services?... which is
what I think John was after (when asking about trafficgeyser.com).
(My guess is he wants to get people to his site to watch his videos...
rather than pushing his videos to
I don't have first hand experience with traffic geyser's subscription
service, but I do know about TubeMogul's free service (I'm part of the
founding team). We now also have a subscription service for corporate
users.
TubeMogul allows you to distribute to the top sites, which also gives
you the
I don't think SEO will get you video views. but it can get people
to your site. (Whether they stay there or and whether they watch you
videos is another question.)
10 ways to get more people to your show without paying anyone for SEO:
1) Be Interesting. If you're boring, no one will link
- Original Message -
From: Jake Ludington
(snip)
The big secret for video bloggers who want to rank well in Google is you
need to be willing to write text - Google is still a text based search
engine. If you can't be bothered to write something descriptive, you will
languish in search
Thanks Kathryn!
Cheers,
Ron Watson
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://k9disc.com
http://discdogradio.com
http://pawsitivevybe.com
On Feb 4, 2008, at 11:54 AM, Kathryn Jones wrote:
hey ron!
I am happy to forward you the release I used for my postcast question
of the week, it was a man on the
I've investigated that .. and it's beyond me .. but, currently, that
page
shows up on the first page of a Google search .. good enough for now.
I apologize for my post - I had the mistaken impression that you were
attempting to get more traffic.
As for not liking QuickTime - I don't really
Call For Entries Issued for Filmmakers, Television Producers and
Videographers by International Awards Competition, The Accolade
Deadline: February 15 Information: www.TheAccolade.net
Now in its sixth year, top-tier, international awards competition, The
Accolade, announces its Call For
I would be nice if, for example, each WordPress (or Show in a Box)
based video blog had a plugin that could show the entire threaded
convo itself.
That way you could see the convo no matter which video blog you were on.
--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
http://ChangeLog.ca/
Motorsport Videos
I don't think SEO will get you video views. but it can get people
to your site. (Whether they stay there or and whether they watch you
videos is another question.)
--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
http://ChangeLog.ca/
Motorsport Videos
http://TireBiterZ.com/
Vlog Razor... Vlogging
Hey David,
Thoughts on spam issues with plugins like this?
Can it hook into Wordpress Aksimet?
Nice work.
Sull
On Feb 4, 2008 5:01 PM, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all -
Based on some initial playing around with the video comment plugin
for wordpress, I've updated the
as far as I understand it, this should work with the moderation system
and plugins like akismet. (If that's not the case let me know).
The video fields get saved to the database once the actual comment
does, so if you have some sort of pre-screen check (captcha or
something) it should work fine
obviously of interest
http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2008/02/urls-are-people-too.html
On Feb 4, 2008 1:40 PM, Mike Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would need someone who can develop it to do a protype of
the idea in it's most simple form, a proof of concept.
- Original Message -
From: Jake Ludington
Not to pick on you, but both of those sites are horrible from an SEO
perspective. :)
You lost me with SEO
Each of those video posts you have should live on an individual page, with
an appropriate title. For instance, create a separate page
My experience with Google is that it does not matter what text you have
on
your site .. if no one is linked to your site Google will not list your
site
in ANY position. The more folks who link to your site the higher you
will
rank.
http://n1jdu.org
http://bostonfandom.org
Not to pick
I completly agree on having choices, that's part of why I offer a
windows file as well as a flash, the issue I am having at the moment,
is that in Vegas you can now export to Ipod right out of vegas,
saving me time as I now longer have to create an avi then use
quicktime pro. But in vegas you
Thanks Jeffrey; I am officially watching and this will help me remember as
I get RSS from my Upcoming events. :-)
Rox
On Feb 3, 2008 1:16 PM, beth_tilston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Invite me, then I'll feel special and will probably come. Maybe I'll
have converted some people via Node
- Original Message -
From: Jake Ludington
I apologize for my post - I had the mistaken impression that you were
attempting to get more traffic.
The original poster may have .. I was making a comment on my experience with
Google.
To further explain:
I have a friend who I wrote a
Matter in what sense? Largest possible audience? Probably, but I've
been doing HUGE files since 05 and havn't had any problems growing an
audience.
As a general rule my shows are a hour and a half long (movie and host
segments). Now I have spent a long time trying to perfect my
compression, but
There's also the Google Sandbox...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_Effect
You're put under a waiting period before being listed. Although
having people link to you can help you get out of the sandbox.
See ya
--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
http://ChangeLog.ca/
Motorsport Videos
To further explain:
I have a friend who I wrote a webpage for: http://halkoltinshow.com
and
then I submitted this page to Google and various other search engines
.. and
I waited .. and waited .. for months .. with zip for results.
For better results in the future - the domain is actually
Hi all -
Based on some initial playing around with the video comment plugin
for wordpress, I've updated the plugin to version 1.2. You can
download the latest version at
http://www.davidmeade.com/wordpress-plugins#videoComments
Feel free to test/play-around at:
On Feb 4, 2008 5:14 PM, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But this does lead to another question, how many people are watching
the videos on site and how many download and watch on their
portable? Anybody know of any studies on that?
Good question. I think the vast majority of people are
I have been inspired by this video:
http://www.flashvideofactory.com/test/DEMO720_Heima_H264_500K.html
So that video is 1280x720 25fps but the bitrate is only 500K :)
So that video which is naerly 4 minutes long, is only 15.5MB in size, but 720p
resolution :)
In not sure which encoder
On 05/02/2008, at 1:44 AM, Heath wrote:
It seemed in the begining, shorter and smaller was better, but is that
changing at all? I mean with the push towards HD, with being able to
view content on the TV, etc, it just seems like its all a part of the
evolution...or is it?
hi Heath
Steve, the quality at that size is incredible. Ive played around with
Divx in SD footage and got my best results, but nothing like that.
Outputting the best quality from the Cam still seems to be the key to
stunning video.
Cheers Rambo
HYPERLINK
On 02/02/2008, at 8:53 PM, Jay dedman wrote:
when you start talking like tis Adrian, you lose me.
I am understanding the concepts of video commenting and following
the threads.
im in.
fair enough. lose myself too.
I'll think through and try to make a QT mockup to explain what I mean.
46 matches
Mail list logo
