http://www.osnews.com/story/23236/Why_Our_Civilization_s_Video_Art_and_Culture_is_Threatened_by_the_MPEG-LA
it looking more and more like GIF/LZW/Unisys, but it called
Microsoft/apple/MPEG-LA/etc
24 hours a minute. the current stats on youtube uploads.
who besides me was surprised at the suggestion that the plethora of videos on
youtube was a clear and present danger to the porn guys that built thenet .
voyuers are what they are, no matter how they find what you have to offer.
so go there, claim our rights, use our name, see what happens.
dyna-flix.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mark Villaseñor videoblogyahoogr...@...
wrote:
Steve Elbows: I very much doubt that you have to be a user of the service
in order to file a takedown notice under the DMCA.
I
What are you going on about?
Protecting your copyrighted works via takedown notices is not the same as
signing up for the site in order to upload content.
And other people cannot claim to be the copyright holder and start throwing
takedown notices around on your behalf, that we be bogus and an
Well I think that article raises some important issues. Its more than a tad
hysterical in some respects though.
Lets face it, there is no end of legal smallprint issues, if we paid attention
to every last one and assumed worst case scenarios as that article does, I
could hardly get out of bed
I agree about the worst case scenarios usually, however, given the state of on
line media and given the very real and intense battle going on over copyrights,
copyright protections, the RIAA suing everyone, the big media corporations
working harder than ever to buy legsislation, the inability
Oh I dont know. Considering that the companies who hold the patents for things
like H.264 are also companies that need us to both consume and create media in
order to make a profit from us via sales of hardware, software services, I
dont really think it is in their interests to try to extract
daredolls: so go there, claim our rights, use our name, see what happens.
Ahhmmm, yeah, right... This issue requires only a pittance of comprehensive
grasp; you are mistaken. Intellectual Property defense does not depend upon
membership with a subject ISP. Never has, probably never will.
Their should just be a formal written statement of exclusion. maybe content
creators and consumers are excluded while manufacturers of hardware and
software are not. Then content creators would know that this will not and
does not effect them. Maybe the fight should be for exemption policy and
I'll chime in on YouTube
DMCA is one thing - one can file, and then the recipient can file a
counter-notice to get the file put back up, and one has no option
except to satrt proceedings. Thus it is not a very effective or
economical way to take stuff down
Terms Of Use takedowns on content on
Joly MacFie: ...one can file [DMCA], and then the recipient can file a
counter-notice to get the file put back up, and one has no option except to
satrt proceedings. Thus it is not a very effective or economical way to take
stuff down
Presuming you are referring to litigation by use of the
Yay here is a very sensible article that is the perfect antidote to the
hysterical OSNews story:
http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/04/know-your-rights-h-264-patent-licensing-and-you/?s=t5
Cheers
Steve
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan sullele...@... wrote:
Their should
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:57 PM, tom_a_sparks tom_a_spa...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
http://www.osnews.com/story/23236/Why_Our_Civilization_s_Video_Art_and_Culture_is_Threatened_by_the_MPEG-LA
it looking more and more like GIF/LZW/Unisys, but it called
Microsoft/apple/MPEG-LA/etc
My Sanyo Xacti
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:09 PM, daredolls dared...@gmail.com wrote:
24 hours a minute. the current stats on youtube uploads.
who besides me was surprised at the suggestion that the plethora of videos on
youtube was a clear and present danger to the porn guys that built the net .
voyuers
nice post.
On May 4, 2010 8:16 PM, elbowsofdeath st...@dvmachine.com wrote:
Yay here is a very sensible article that is the perfect antidote to the
hysterical OSNews story:
http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/04/know-your-rights-h-264-patent-licensing-and-you/?s=t5
Cheers
Steve
--- In
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan sullele...@... wrote:
nice post.
On May 4, 2010 8:16 PM, elbowsofdeath st...@... wrote:
Yay here is a very sensible article that is the perfect antidote to the
hysterical OSNews story:
16 matches
Mail list logo
