[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-18 Thread ~ FluxRostrum
2nd the motion for less talk more video. Solidarity, ~FluxRostrum VLOG~FLUX http://FluxRostrum.BlogSpot.com ~~~ Syndicate Flux http://feeds.feedburner.com/VLOGFLUX ~~~ http://GlassBeadCollective.org ~~~ Old School http://Fluxview.com Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:07:18 +1100 From: Richard

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-18 Thread Richard Show
well, how about a video with talk?it's time for me to dust off an early effort on vlog definitions http://www.richardshow.com/2005/06/richard-defines-video-blog.html ... Richard (the shameless self promoter) ... p.s. The Richard Show, really isn't about me ... really ... RichardOn 12/18/05, ~

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But it became a vibrant media once Griffith found and clearly displayed the 60-120 minute, three act model in Birth of a Nation. 'The Birth of a Nation' goes for 187 minutes. Just for the record.

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is the form of a duration around 90 minutes with three acts that does define the cinematic form. This is so wrong it's not funny. The length criterion (not to mention the absurd narrative-biased three act structure

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Chuck Olsen
Warning - do not step into the ring with Matt Clayfield on matters of the cinema. You will get served. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is the form of a duration around

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
It is more useful to have a model that applies somewhat than no model at all. -- Enric --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: oxymoron alert! there is no such thing as a correct model otherwise it would not be a model all models are approximations

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But it became a vibrant media once Griffith found and clearly displayed the 60-120 minute, three act model in Birth of a Nation. 'The

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is the form of a duration around 90 minutes with three acts that does define the cinematic form. This is so wrong it's not funny.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Markus Sandy
Enric wrote: It is more useful to have a model that applies somewhat than no model at all. -- Enric i can't say i agree with that enric i think vlogs are more like canvas... i looked up the definition of canvas a few times all the ones i found were pretty lame and they have no bearing

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/17/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand the need to strictly define videoblogging except to separate individually (or collectively) produced independent video from advertising

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread chris_koehn
Ha, I had mistakenly thought this conversation was dead. Here's something to think about for those that demand definition. Perhaps defintions are for those who can't simply enjoy something, or just plain don't get it? Definitions are a crutch. Go do something.

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, chris_koehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ha, I had mistakenly thought this conversation was dead. Here's something to think about for those that demand definition. Perhaps defintions are for those who can't simply enjoy something, or just plain don't get

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Chuck Olsen
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my opinion vlogging is not a modele ( there is x modele of vlogging) may be a spirit the feeling of the media's mastering i like the sounds of that! i'm not one for dogma or definitions. but i've always been a sucker

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From a comment on Amazon.com on the running time of Birth of a Nation: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/6305130949/104-5203272-5767925?v=glancen=130: Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, there's a definition of cinema, I would say too loosely defined. But a start. I'm not proposing a restrictive defintion of videoblogging. Just that it is more useful to have a workable definition than none. --

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, there's a definition of cinema, I would say too loosely defined. But a start. I'm not proposing a restrictive defintion of

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not a crime to have models... And I'm not saying it is. And I'm still not talking about videoblogging. You didn't say that a certain form was or could be a model for a certain type of cinema, Enric, you said that a

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From a comment on Amazon.com on the running time of Birth of a Nation:

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of this film on video. They are of varying prices, and varying run times: I found run times of 124min., 125min., 158min., 159min., 190min., and 207min. Wow, what a great idea. I'd love to be able to order a film at the length I prefer. Imagine King

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not a crime to have models... And I'm not saying it is. And I'm still not talking about videoblogging. You didn't say that a

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:21:47 +0100, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of this film on video. They are of varying prices, and varying run times: I found run times of 124min., 125min., 158min., 159min., 190min., and 207min. Wow,

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Imagine King Kong at around 5 minutes. There's a vlog entry in that. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Birth of a Nation has had different running times depending on what the various distibutors over time thought worked best. Oh, so

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Though finding the definition providing the fundatmental characteristic of videoblogging will also be useful. The fundamental characteristic of videoblogging is time-based images exisiting in a more or less permeable network

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a statement of fact, not value. You were contradicting yourself. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Amazon.com is NOT an authority. Check the IMDb if you have to check anything. i think Amazon owns IMDB. -Josh Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a statement of fact, not value. You were contradicting yourself. You're correct on that point. -- Enric

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i think Amazon owns IMDB. Really? Wow. I had no idea. What u$e could they po$$ibly have with a $ite like that, I wonder? Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please explain and/or example permeable network context. The multidirectional communication flow of the internet. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income homes are not

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please explain and/or example permeable network context. The multidirectional communication flow of the internet. OK, what about the blog

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please explain and/or example permeable network context. The

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
At 0:03 + 18/12/05, Enric wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you guys having fun with this? I hope so,

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 0:03 + 18/12/05, Enric wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield --- In

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you guys having fun with this? I hope so, because its starting to drag on a little... Starting? A little? Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
At 0:12 + 18/12/05, Matthew Clayfield wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you guys having fun with this? I hope so, because its starting to drag on a little... Starting? A little? It's all about the tension over time. We'll

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread robert a/k/a r
which would make videobloggers all gen(i)uses ;-/ On Dec 17, 2005, at 6:42 PM, Matthew Clayfield wrote: If cinema is a phylum, videoblogging is a genus. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's all about the tension over time. We'll come to that later in our series. :-) Actually, I can't think of a worse example of storytelling than discussion list topics! They suck hard when it comes time

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: which would make videobloggers all gen(i)uses ;-/ Ha ha. Seriously, though, we might say that if videoblogging is a genus, then the various types of videoblogging (personal, citizen journalism, experimental,

[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Bill Streeter
This is a very controversial film. No doubt there are several different cuts floating around out there. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Ted Tagami
Bill - You just nailed it. Well done.On 12/17/05, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a very controversial film. No doubt there are several different cuts floating around out there. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard