[videoblogging] Re: Standard H.264 Encoding

2008-01-23 Thread Chris
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chumley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When you say your TV collection, I hope you don't mean television shows your going to rebroadcast on your podcast. I believe he meant his actual, physical collection of TVs. Chris

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Standard H.264 Encoding

2008-01-23 Thread Jay dedman
I believe he meant his actual, physical collection of TVs. a videoblog about old TV's! Pat...you are a quiet genius in Denver. Jay -- http://jaydedman.com 917 371 6790 Professional: http://ryanishungry.com Personal: http://momentshowing.net Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/

[videoblogging] Re: Standard H.264 Encoding

2008-01-23 Thread Chumley
I believe he meant his actual, physical collection of TVs. If that's the case, that would be sweet! I loves me some old dial television sets. Rev. Chumley Cult of UHF http://www.cultofuhf.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In

[videoblogging] Re: Standard H.264 Encoding

2008-01-23 Thread Steve Watkins
Hello, There are 1 or 2 confusions I have about your plan, hopefully I can put them into words that help rather than hinder... You say h.264 will be mainly for cell phones, but very few phones play h264 yet (the iphone and the nokia n95 and probably a few others). For itunes, ipod, iphone,

[videoblogging] Re: Standard H.264 Encoding

2008-01-23 Thread Steve Watkins
Oops that was supposed to read .mov not .moc Would be keen to hear from others with opinions on this sort of stuff too, I know a lot of people are probably keeping things simple by offering 2 or 3 different versions, eg a mpeg4 or h264 .mp4 or .mov, and a flash version thats usually encoded

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Standard H.264 Encoding

2008-01-23 Thread David King
Good discussion (since I've been thinking about this, too!). With standard video, I've been slowly moving to 640x480. I find it's just bigger enough to get much better clarity but still stay relatively small (for the short videos I do, anyway). I'm more confused with the 16:9 resolution sizes.

[videoblogging] Re: Standard H.264 Encoding

2008-01-23 Thread Mike Moon
I output to h.264 format, using the settings on FreeVlog.org and they are compatible with my iPod. I've since picked up an Elgato Turbo.264 (http://tinyurl.com/2jp25o) which hardware outputs to H.264 for iPod, iPhone and AppleTV formats. I guess my point is, the h.264 could - perhaps should - be

[videoblogging] Re: Standard H.264 Encoding

2008-01-22 Thread Chris
Pat, I tend to go with the settings they recommend at freevlog: http://www.freevlog.org/index.php/category/compression/ Chris --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone: I'm planning to launch a new video podcast featuring my classic TV (READ

[videoblogging] Re: Standard H.264 Encoding

2008-01-22 Thread Chumley
When you say your TV collection, I hope you don't mean television shows your going to rebroadcast on your podcast. Unless they are in the public domain (and in all reality they would have to be reay old)that is some serious illegal. Rev Chumley Cult of UHF http://www.cultofuhf.com --- In