Quick thankjs to sull for helping keep wiki clean..,.meaningfulOn 8/6/05, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll roll a 20 sided dice for EnclosureCast.
Snort.
Back to casting Magic Missile,
Eric
http://www.ericrice.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah, the ole CMS verses BLOG comparison... ;-)
anyways, i last edited wikipedia... and appled this line:
Blogs often take advantage of RSS for
syndication to other web sites and aggregator software (rss
Stephcast.
[I saw Richcast and just had to jump on the branding]
On 8/6/05, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richcast
Mediacast
J
--
It isn't done alone. Pay more.
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
http://blog.urbanartadventures.com
http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com
Demographics are showing to be very interesting. Its time to do a
survey, but having started with just a few people and building it up
over time, especially with audience involvement, I feel like I have a
pretty good idea of our demographics anyway.
First Adopters Of technology
Smart
I like your list. It integrates what I called subtle infomercial in Reputation enhancement which is a much better formulation.
Just for the purpose of brainstorming, here are a few ideas. Not sure where they fit in your classification:
1. Serial writer, painter, sculpter, artist, cartoonist
Is Rocketboom the model for advertisment supported content?
Jamie
thekeverreport.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chris Baudry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would like to add a third type of Videoblogs: Videoblogs which
are done by
experts or small businesses and make them better
It may not be *the* model, but it could be *a* model. There may be
several, time will tell.
-josh
On 8/5/05, jmedakev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Rocketboom the model for advertisment supported content?
Jamie
thekeverreport.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group
what's the entire list (proven and speculative) of models?
1) adverts within the production (rocketboom)
2) adverts on vlog entry (google ads in sidebar)
3) reputation enhancement (pro gigs resulting from visibility)
4) pay-per-view
5) software licensing
6) hosting for fee (or sharing
To the extent that RB has a large subscriber base, oh yes, that would be a
model for sure.
Hey, Andrew, what do you have by way of demographics?
Jan
--
It isn't done alone. Pay more.
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
http://blog.urbanartadventures.com
http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com
Here's another model:
http://www.mattreggietv.com/
A USC quarterback promises to go behind the scenes in his new vlog,
which will be free for a few weeks, until it is integrated into the
USC football subscription website. See press release here:
No feed. Not a vlog. This is just video on a website. Unfortunately, I
can imagine we'll see a lot of this kind of stuff called vlogs.
Boo.
Not to spark the age old what is a videoblog? discussion, but I
think we've agreed that a videoblog must first be video in a blog.
-Josh
On 8/5/05,
The blog medium is evolving. A blog does not require a feed, but a
blog without a feed is certainly lacking something very expected of a
blog. It would be like a fish without gills.
-josh
On 8/5/05, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but as we all know, blog does not equate to
The key concept is still the same--content delivery (video, audio,
photo, text, etc) and feedback over the internet to whatever device
can get itself connected. It may not sound as sexy as vlogging, but
we're not doing anything new here that couldn't be done in 1994 with a
lot more money (and
Where does it say a blog has to have a feed?
I don't think a blog has to have a feed. I personally don't use any
aggregate. I don't like them. If I want to see a site, I go to it
personally. That will not change... unless the aggregate becomes my
iPod (which I still don't have). Hopefully
around the 5/8/05 Stephanie Bryant mentioned about Re:
[videoblogging] Re: The innocence of the vlogosphere is that:
Blog is basically easy way to post
regular updates of content to a website.
no. that is CMS. it might not have to have a feed to be a blog, but
it has to be more than easy
ah, the ole CMS verses BLOG comparison... ;-)
many blogs are CMS and vise versa. many hybrid mixed breed apps
out their. still, you can most likely always 'blog' using a CMS.
anyways, i last edited wikipedia... and appled this line:
Blogs often take advantage of RSS for syndication to other
I'll roll a 20 sided dice for EnclosureCast.
Snort.
Back to casting Magic Missile,
Eric
http://www.ericrice.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah, the ole CMS verses BLOG comparison... ;-)
many blogs are CMS and vise versa. many hybrid
Right... I think Minnesota Stories is a bit of a hybrid. I also don't
want to box it in or overly define it right now. It's young (1 month
old!). It feels personal when I make something, and when other
people contribute their video it's personal to them (usually). It's a
conduit for stories,
In any case...For whatever reason you've gotten into videoblogging,
podcasting, a band whatever...Let the creative juices flow, and If you
stay true to yourself, the rest will come.
JaDonnelly
www.madpod.com
www.dummycast.com
www.madlymedia.com
www.moonvideo.com
--- In
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at podcasting...just wait until traditional media jumps in.
It puts a smile on my face. Define it however you want. I'm just
excited to see it happening.
Exactly. This is no different than when everyone was
20 matches
Mail list logo
