Has anyone had any problems with the Panasonic DVX100B and shooting
in 16:9?
Heath
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if anyone had any experience with the below models
Panasonic Pro AG-DVX100B
Sony HVR-A1U CMOS High Definition
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, josheklow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm shopping around for a new camera for vlogging as well as other
video projects.
Will the camera be hand-held? So far the discussion has been about
specs and
image quality somehow devoid from the shooter.
I
On the other hand there is an argument to be made AGAINST shoulder mounted
ENG style cameras for handheld use, depending on one's goals. Straight doc
and news style shooting, yup, great, stability, relative lack of body pain
and otherwise good ergonomics. But once you need to go into a wider range
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, josheklow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm shopping around for a new camera for vlogging as well as other
video projects. I've been
looking at the Canon XL2, the Panasonic DVX100B, and the Sony PD170.
I'm going to be
trying these cameras out before I make
If it's between these two cameras Heath I would go with the Panasonic.
I've worked with it a lot and it's a killer camera. My personal
favorite is the Canon XL-2 but is a much larger camera with a much
smaller viewfinder.
If HD is a must for you I would go with the Canon XH-A1. It's a 3ccd
camera
It's interesting I did not realize that HV20 was that good, I knew it
was good, but not professinal quality good...someone mentioned I think
Brook, that the workflow can get a little tricky...in what way?
Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://heathparks.com
All this would be so much easier if I
The IMAGE *is* that good. The CAMERA has serious limitations - the praise
for it is primarily based on it packing so much into such a small and cheap
camera, and the fact that they found a way to tweak the CMOS chip to give
better low light and noise performance than other cameras using the
Yes I agree that the XL2 is way too big. And yeah the interchangeable
lenses is an inticing concept, but honestly very few people who buy
this camera ever get another lens for it. And the lenses are really
expensive anyway. Some cost almost as much as another camera. I prefer
a small camera
The Panasonic is a sweet camera and would be a great investment for
more high-end video productions, but I don't see it as a practical
choice for vlogging--it's not exactly the kind of take it anywhere
camera (or at least I wouldn't feel comfortable using it that way).
Same, really, with the
So much depends on what kind of vlogging you do and what other uses you'll
make of these cameras. I have used all three, and have an extremely strong
preference for the Panasonic over the other two, but none of them are ideal
for on-the-street quick-shoot purposes.
These days when I'm shooting DV
Brook Hinton wrote:
[...] DVX100B - I love the DVX and HVX cameras. If the old TRV-900s
were the DV
bolexes of their day, the DVX100's are the DV aatons. But they
invite and in
some cases require a pretty deep understanding of cinematography
and the
technical underbelly of digital
All nice cameras. The XL2 is the bulkier of the bunch but there's the
option of interchangeable lenses if you need it. I don't think the
PD170 has the 24P option or other frame rate modes other than a
movie mode. The Sony and Panasonic come with XLR ins and the Canon
requires an attachment
12 matches
Mail list logo
