Re: Termdebug for Windows: why a "prompt" buffer instead of a terminal buffer?

2024-05-09 Thread Christian Brabandt
On Do, 09 Mai 2024, Ubaldo Tiberi wrote: > Ok! Makes sense! Thanks! > > But that lead me to the following question: why use gdb mi instead of > term_sendkeys, jobs and channel? jobs and channels will always be used. Using term_sendkeys sounds brittle however. Thanks, Chris -- Moon, n.:

Re: Termdebug for Windows: why a "prompt" buffer instead of a terminal buffer?

2024-05-09 Thread Ubaldo Tiberi
Hi! I thanks for your reply. have already read it but It didn’t answer any of my questions. Best, /Ubaldo On Thursday 9 May 2024 at 01:48:06 UTC+2 Alessandro Antonello wrote: > Hi, Tiberi. > > You should take a look in the help of 'termdebug-prompt'. There you can > find why your Vim

Re: Termdebug for Windows: why a "prompt" buffer instead of a terminal buffer?

2024-05-09 Thread Christian Brabandt
On Mi, 08 Mai 2024, Ubaldo Tiberi wrote: > Hi!  > > I thanks  for your reply. > have already read it but It didn’t answer any of my questions.  I think the reason is, that on Windows using a pty may not always work. This is briefly mentioned at :h 'termwintype'. If you sure it works for

Re: Termdebug for Windows: why a "prompt" buffer instead of a terminal buffer?

2024-05-09 Thread Ubaldo Tiberi
I meant, I read ‘termdebug-prompt’ :-) Best, /Ubaldo > Il giorno 9 mag 2024, alle ore 08:18, Ubaldo Tiberi > ha scritto: > > termdebug-prompt' -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more

Re: Termdebug for Windows: why a "prompt" buffer instead of a terminal buffer?

2024-05-09 Thread Ubaldo Tiberi
Ok! Makes sense! Thanks! But that lead me to the following question: why use gdb mi instead of term_sendkeys, jobs and channel? That way we would be OS independent and we would also not depend on external tools features (in this case gdb mi) for which we have zero control. … genuinely

Re: Termdebug for Windows: why a "prompt" buffer instead of a terminal buffer?

2024-05-09 Thread Ubaldo Tiberi
Yeah. In-fact there are apparently no reasons to use term_sendkeys… Best, /Ubaldo > Il giorno 9 mag 2024, alle ore 09:27, Christian Brabandt > ha scritto: > >  >> On Do, 09 Mai 2024, Ubaldo Tiberi wrote: >> >> Ok! Makes sense! Thanks! >> >> But that lead me to the following question: why

Re: Access class member from command line

2024-05-09 Thread Lifepillar
On 2024-05-09, Yegappan Lakshmanan wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 2:11 PM Lifepillar wrote: >> > Looks like a bug. Should be able to do `foo.Config.option = true` >> >> Indeed. And fixed. That works with the latest Vim (9.1.399). >> > > Yes. This should be addressed by patch 9.1.0398.

Re: Access class member from command line

2024-05-09 Thread Yegappan Lakshmanan
Hi, On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 1:16 AM Lifepillar wrote: > > On 2024-05-09, Yegappan Lakshmanan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 2:11 PM Lifepillar wrote: > >> > Looks like a bug. Should be able to do `foo.Config.option = true` > >> > >> Indeed. And fixed. That works with the latest