Hi,
I have a python script that uses 'vpp_papi' to try to connect to the 'vpp'
running on the local host. It's based on my reading of the source code in
'src/vpp-api/python/vpp_papi'. One problem I'm running into is that the client
fails to connect to the vpp with the error message:
>
>
>
Hi Team,
I am trying to find a way to delete the ACL rules. From the commands provided
in acl-plugin, I coudn't find a way to delete the acls after addition.
The only way to delete ACL rules are just restart VPP, I don't want to do that.
How can we dynamically delete the rules? always the rules
Hi friends,
how can I ping a loopback in vpp? I can ping the normal interface from
cisco but for loopback no.
thanks
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#19935): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/19935
Mute This Topic:
Hi ,
What could be the reason for the " l2-flood: BVI packet with unhandled
ethertype " error? Could gns3 simulation conditions cause it?
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 11:53 AM Mohsen Meamarian via lists.fd.io
wrote:
> Hi friends ,
> I have a problem with ARP delivery to the BVI interface on a BD. I
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 7:40 AM Neale Ranns wrote:
>
>
> i would argue the contrary, not subnetting (i.e. using /32) is not a valid
> approach to subnetting.
>
Again: GCP does this. Calico for K8s (the most used K8s CNI plugin) does
this. Its basically the direction Cloud is going in the
Neale,
/32s on interfaces that talk to other things are actually getting to be the
standard in Cloud. GCP uses /32s in their VMs exclusively. Calico uses
/32s on on Pod interfaces. Its a common use case.
Ed
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 3:03 AM Neale Ranns wrote:
>
>
> Hi Artem,
>
>
>
> I think
Hi,
We have a use case where we have two VPP nodes i.e. VN1 and VN2 , in a local
redundancy testing setup, VN1 is acting as primary node and VN2 is acting as
secondary node. VN1 has localsid configuration on it. VN2 has a neighbor and
fib entry corresponding to the localsid of VN1. Now when we
On 09/08/2021 10:15, "otr...@employees.org" wrote:
> I think that is telling you not to use /32 address on interface for which you
> expect there to be connected peers.
> From an IP networking perspective, if you want two peers to be connected on
> an interface, they need to be within the
> I think that is telling you not to use /32 address on interface for which you
> expect there to be connected peers.
> From an IP networking perspective, if you want two peers to be connected on
> an interface, they need to be within the same subnet, so use a /31.
For p2p links there are
Hi Artem,
I think that is telling you not to use /32 address on interface for which you
expect there to be connected peers.
>From an IP networking perspective, if you want two peers to be connected on an
>interface, they need to be within the same subnet, so use a /31.
/neale
From:
Hi friends ,
I have a problem with ARP delivery to the BVI interface on a BD. I see in
trace that the ARP packet after l2 flooding goes to the Non-BVI output
interface , but this doesn't happen for a loopback/BVI interface. thus I
can't ping 100.3.4.4 from 100.3.4.11.
create bridge-domain 2
set
11 matches
Mail list logo
