Hi Mauro,
I merged your cherry-pick to stable/21.10 [1] and will work with Andrew
to schedule a maintenance release.
Thanks,
-daw-
On 11/3/21 1:09 PM, Mauro Sardara (msardara) via lists.fd.io wrote:
Hello All,
I am having an issue with the new VPP version 21.10 because of some
header
Hi Ole,
The problem I am facing is a bit different. It is not that it is failing for me
in any scenario, but the implementation seems a little confusing and hence I
posted this query for clarification. I'll try explaining my test scenario.
The documentation for VPP Configuration File -
Hi Laszlo,
Thanks! A few comments:
- I think it would be easier to just merge both patches
- I would put the Dockerfile under extras/rpm instead of a dedicated
directory, alongside a small README to explain how to use it for testing
- you should add yourself in MAINTAINERS as the maintainer
Hello,
I pushed the patches for providing support to build vpp on opensuse leap:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/34356
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/34357
The rpm build can be tried out by the provided docker manifest file:
docker build -f extras/docker/build/Dockerfile.opensuse .
Could you
Based on your output looks like you are using quite old version of vpp.
In the recent versions of VPP AVX-512 instructions are used automatically if
CPU supports them…
—
Damjan
> On 05.11.2021., at 10:52, haiyan...@ilinkall.cn wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear vpp group:
>
>I changed dpdk-input
Dear vpp group:
I changed dpdk-input node to avx512 as this message said
"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io | A question about enable AVX512 instruction in VPP", but
others still uses avx2 as below
so how could i enable it for all the plugins and all the drivers? Thanks for
any reply
Thanks ben
With software RSS , the test result is OK.
This should be ixgbevf RSS issue .
zhangguangm...@baicells.com
From: Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io
Date: 2021-11-05 16:15
To: zhangguangm...@baicells.com
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Is there a bug in IKEv2 when enable
Hi Stanislav,
IMHO the ASSERT is a false negative, even though the load-balance has been put
in the pool, its memory is still valid and can still be safely retrieved from a
worker. If the load-balance was re-used before all workers were done with it,
then we’d have problems, but that doesn’t
Here is my take: currently in the ike plugin we expect all related ike packets
to arrive on the same NIC queue. I expect all ike packets to use the same UDP
5-tuple, hence I think this assumption is correct.
If you can share a scenario (in the RFC or even better with an existing ike
Hi all,
I’m testing multiple tenants using nat44-plugin.
The app version uses 21.10-release.
```
vpp# sh version
vpp v21-10-release built by root on 912b4c35bcd7 at 2021-10-27T12:54:43
```
I understand that when nat44 is enabled, one inside-vrf and one outside-vrf are
specified (If not
10 matches
Mail list logo
