Hi Jasper,
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 03:53, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> From IRC conversations with krh a long time ago, this is indeed intentional
> and the cursor surface should "lose its role" in modern parlance.
>
> The original intention was to prevent glitching of the cursor surface. e.g.
>
Hi,
>From IRC conversations with krh a long time ago, this is indeed intentional
and the cursor surface should "lose its role" in modern parlance.
The original intention was to prevent glitching of the cursor surface. e.g.
If the left side of the surface has a resize left cursor, you leave, and
Hey,
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 at 22:45, Derek Foreman
wrote:
> On 2018-07-22 05:55 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I take it the problem is that the client sets a particular surface as
> > the pointer surface, loses focus, sets the same surface as the pointer
> > surface on re-enter after not changing
On 2018-07-22 05:55 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hey Derek,
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 at 22:16, Derek Foreman wrote:
>> Keep track of what cusor image buffer is attached to the cursor
>> surface and avoid re-attaching it if we don't have to.
>>
>> This isn't just an obviously pointless optimization,
Hey Derek,
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 at 22:16, Derek Foreman wrote:
> Keep track of what cusor image buffer is attached to the cursor
> surface and avoid re-attaching it if we don't have to.
>
> This isn't just an obviously pointless optimization, it turns all
> of toy toolkit into a test case for
Keep track of what cusor image buffer is attached to the cursor
surface and avoid re-attaching it if we don't have to.
This isn't just an obviously pointless optimization, it turns all
of toy toolkit into a test case for handling this properly.
Signed-off-by: Derek Foreman
