On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
That said, this plan was based on the premise that Chromium folks were
willing
-Original Message-
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev-
boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Adam Barth
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 3:20 AM
To: Darin Fisher
Cc: Benjamin Poulain; WebKit Development
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Changing the implementation
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
That
On Jan 28, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Brett Wilson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:49 AM,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 28, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Brett Wilson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:39
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 28, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Brett Wilson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at
-Original Message-
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev-
boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Maciej Stachowiak
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 7:08 PM
To: Brett Wilson
Cc: Benjamin Poulain; WebKit Development
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Changing the
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Joe Mason jma...@rim.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev-
boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Maciej Stachowiak
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 7:08 PM
To: Brett Wilson
Cc: Benjamin Poulain;
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
So to clarify, I think we need to keep the current architecture.
Obviously WebKit needs a URL class that uses its String class, so
WTFURL would probably be a wrapper around some core library for WebKit
to use. Chromium
The other concern I have is about the stability of the API to the URL
guts that GURL living in the chromium repository would depend on. Anyone
changing the URL guts would need to be careful not to break that contract.
This seems like it might be annoying for those who do not work on chromium.
On
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
So to clarify, I think we need to keep the current architecture.
Obviously WebKit needs a URL class that uses its String class, so
WTFURL would
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org
wrote:
So to clarify, I think we need to keep the current architecture.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
If CFNetwork exposed an API to its URL parser, then it would be super wise
for
any port of WebKit using CFNetwork to reuse the same URL parser.
That is an interesting idea.
I always considered it would be beneficial to
13 matches
Mail list logo
