Right, as long as it is part of the language and consistent across compilers /
platforms, I don’t think we need to use macros.
> On Jan 24, 2024, at 11:59 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> I had a [[fallthrough]] patch, but internal C code got in the way:
>
> -
I support using standardized and widely enough available language features
directly instead of through macros whenever we can. It’s similar to when we
drop our own classes and use the ones from the C++ standard, which I think has
been good for the project.
It’s also fine with me to use the
I had a [[fallthrough]] patch, but internal C code got in the way:
- https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/attributes/fallthrough
- https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265789
Using them directly where we can seems nice for (new) readers of the code at
least. Not sure what a macro for
3 matches
Mail list logo
