Website changes look really great.
I also appreciate the general design philosophy behind the site and wonder if
the same could be pushed to the rest of Fedora websites (eg. getfedora) at some
time in the future. It seems more polished generally speaking.
Nadim
Understandable.
I sincerely appreciate everyone's continued efforts on this. I've been using
Fedora for 7+ years and it's great to feel like I can contribute.
I should apologize for coming off strongly, at first, regarding this issue. I
was honestly just unhappy with the state of the photos. I
the necessary
skills to do so. Thanks for your feedback.
On March 22, 2016 6:02:10 PM EDT, Nadim Kobeissi <nadim@nadim.computer> wrote:
Hey Matthew,
I don't have the necessary skills to remove the white halo. Seeing as it's
already present on the original image, perhaps we can go ahead
Hey Matthew,
I don't have the necessary skills to remove the white halo. Seeing as it's
already present on the original image, perhaps we can go ahead and use my
improved images anyway, and have the halo fixed in the future?
Thanks for steering the ship,
Nadim
]
From: Chaoyi Zha <cydrob...@fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 4:53 AM
To: Nadim Kobeissi; Máirín Duffy; websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Replace Terrible Photos on GetFedora.org Workstation Website
Nadim,
You can find the necessary information on cloni
Thanks so much, Chaoyi. That's the resource I was looking for! I'll get to work.
Nadim
From: Chaoyi Zha <cydrob...@fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 4:53 AM
To: Nadim Kobeissi; Máirín Duffy; websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: R
for your response,
Nadim
From: Máirín Duffy <du...@fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 2:14 AM
To: Nadim Kobeissi; websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Replace Terrible Photos on GetFedora.org Workstation Website
On 03/20/2016 11
Dear webmaster,
You need to seriously consider reverting to the old website.
The new one is buggy, incomplete, disfunctional, and just not well
done. The old one was much more to the point, serious and
well-designed. It just needed better navigation and content. You are
making a big mistake with
