On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
I think it's way better to stay consistent. Especially as the feature
affects the Referer (sic) header.
I too think Anne is right here � there are enough things that are
inconsistent in the web already. Don't add another thing that requires
Hi folks.
I've been looking at an accesskey bug or two in Safari and I am quite
frustrated about the poor standardization of the meaning of this
attribute.
I concur with the comments at http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/forms/accesskey.html
that quote the HTML 4 specification and then says:
On Nov 7, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
A few months back, Charles McCathieNevile proposed a spec for
accesskey on the public-html list:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jul/thread.html#msg185
That thread is maybe worth taking some time to read
I've just
Darin Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2007-11-07 09:22 -0800:
I've been looking at an accesskey bug or two in Safari and I am quite
frustrated about the poor standardization of the meaning of this attribute.
[...]
I think it would be useful to specify this precisely in HTML 5.
accesskey is in wide
Darin Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2007-11-07 11:38 -0800:
[...]
I was hoping HTML 5 would document existing practice in a way that's less
vague than what HTML 4 says.
We could consider changes and new features as well, but that's even more
challenging. Maciej suggested that we dump accesskey
Dnia 07-11-2007, śro o godzinie 15:27 +, Ian Hickson napisał(a):
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
And as far as I can tell, standards other than HTTP have taken this tack
too. For example, the document you can access from JavaScript has a
referrer property, without the
On Nov 7, 2007 9:38 PM, Darin Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could consider changes and new features as well, but that's even
more challenging. Maciej suggested that we dump accesskey and replace
it with something that would solve the real problem, and I think
that's also worth pursuing
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, dolphinling wrote:
HTML5 brings back the |start| attribute on ordered lists. This allows a
list to semantically start with a number other than one. It seems like
the major use case for this is to split lists up, so that a single list
is marked by multiple ols.
Would
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Eugene T.S. Wong wrote:
Should DL children be LI? I ask because I think that it will create
better structure than having all DT DD elements be children of the
same parent. If we use LI as children of DL elements, and then make
DT DD elements the children of the LI
In conclusion, ol type=... hasn't been added to HTML. The suggestion for
addressing the main use case (reference) is to use a hyperlink and CSS to
do the cross-references; CSS is working on this kind of thing.
In coming to this conclusion, the big concern from my point of view was
that there
10 matches
Mail list logo
