Re: [whatwg] link rel=icon width= height=

2008-05-02 Thread fantasai
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: OK, I'm sure the last thing that is needed is more syntax suggestions, but here's an alternate proposal with no new attributes, specify size info as additional rel keywords: link rel=icon scalable type=application/svg href=whatwg.svg link rel=icon 16x16 32x32

Re: [whatwg] link rel=icon width= height=

2008-05-02 Thread fantasai
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: This might require that existing browsers cope correctly (or exploit duplication/error behaviors), but could a MIME parameter address this without needing another attribute at all? That's the most narrowly scoped change I can imagine that would address the need.

[whatwg] 'input' event interpretation

2008-05-02 Thread Rimvydas
The question is related to the 'input' event on Web Forms 2.0. The WF2 specification says: This [input] event must be fired on a control whenever the value of the control changes due to input from the user, and is otherwise identical to the change event. However, there are a few problems with

Re: [whatwg] link rel=icon width= height=

2008-05-02 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 2, 2008, at 12:24 AM, fantasai wrote: Maciej Stachowiak wrote: This might require that existing browsers cope correctly (or exploit duplication/error behaviors), but could a MIME parameter address this without needing another attribute at all? That's the most narrowly scoped

Re: [whatwg] link rel=icon width= height=

2008-05-02 Thread Křištof Želechovski
I think it should be possible to embed rendered bit map images in SVG for lower resolution, just as TrueTypeT fonts embed ideograms. Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maciej Stachowiak Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 12:28 PM To: fantasai

Re: [whatwg] 'input' event interpretation

2008-05-02 Thread Michael A. Puls II
On 5/2/08, Rimvydas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The question is related to the 'input' event on Web Forms 2.0. The WF2 specification says: This [input] event must be fired on a control whenever the value of the control changes due to input from the user, and is otherwise identical to the

Re: [whatwg] Some video questions

2008-05-02 Thread Charles
Not sure why you're responding to a 3-month-old email or what Turing complete has to do with anything (the QuickTime runtime is also Turing complete), but feel free to ping me off-list if you have questions. -- Charles -Original Message- From: Křištof Želechovski [mailto:[EMAIL

[whatwg] activedescendant in viewport (Re: scrollIntoView jarring?)

2008-05-02 Thread David Bolter
Hi Rich, activedescendant: Great. If it will work for us, I feel better relying on the user agent for bringing active descendants into view. I thought we were going to require the DHTML author to perform a scroll of some kind? If not, great, and I agree it would appear to be a akin to

Re: [whatwg] activedescendant in viewport (Re: scrollIntoView jarring?)

2008-05-02 Thread David Bolter
Replying to myself below... David Bolter wrote: Hi Rich, activedescendant: Great. If it will work for us, I feel better relying on the user agent for bringing active descendants into view. I thought we were going to require the DHTML author to perform a scroll of some kind? If not, great,

Re: [whatwg] activedescendant in viewport (Re: scrollIntoView jarring?)

2008-05-02 Thread Aaron Leventhal
I think if there is an attribute like this which also scrolls for you, then it should be called activedescendant, not aria-activedescendant. I don't see a problem if HTML 5 wants the attribute without aria- to drive browser behavior. In that case perhaps it should style the active descendant

[whatwg] postMessage tests updated (again)

2008-05-02 Thread Jeff Walden
http://web.mit.edu/jwalden/www/whatwg/postMessage-v3.zip Same instructions as last time -- unzip, start an HTTP server on port serving postMessage/ as its root directory, set up proxy autoconfig with a PAC URL of http://localhost:/proxy.js, navigate to