Zachary Carter wrote:
FWIW, in my first encounter with HTML5 dialog I assumed it meant a
dialog box.
Yes, I assumed the same thing. I think it would be better to not use
such an overloaded term for the stated purpose.
The spec itself uses dialog in both meanings:
3.4.6 ... tabbed dialogs
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Mike Wilson wrote:
Yes, I assumed the same thing. I think it would be better to not use
such an overloaded term for the stated purpose.
I agree in principle, but the alternatives, e.g.:
so my first recommendation would be to go for conversation and live
with its
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
I believe this can happen in a number of ways, the simplest being that
Page A calls a function on Page B. But I suspect there are also events
that can fire in Page B even after it has closed.
Actually per spec, if I
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Ernest Cline wrote:
I agree that dialog isn't perfect and could be (and has been) confused
with dialog boxes, but I'm not convinced it's not the best name for the
job anyway.
The other possibility is dialogue/ since the computing uses that cause
Ian Hickson wrote:
Jonas Sicking wrote:
Scripts can actually still run fine even if you navigate
away from a page. But there are definitely weird things
happening (such as global scope being different from 'window').
Could you elaborate on this? I'm not clear on how to define this.
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I believe the best solution here is to say that step 5 should throw
an exception. I.e. you can't start playing a media element whose
.ownerDocument is not a displayed document.
What do you think of what the spec says at the moment?
Karl Dubost writes:
Le 14 mai 2008 à 07:09, Ian Hickson a écrit :
That [talk is] probably the best suggestion so far, but I'm still
not convinced it's really much better than dialog . I think it has
at least as many other interpretations (e.g. what we call a talk
over here is really a
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Mikko Rantalainen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If dialog is used instead of dialogue then it should be designed in
a such way that it can be used for dialog box in addition to dialogue
(e.g. chat) in the future.
I severely doubt this is possible or desirable.
2008/5/13 Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Paweł Stradomski wrote:
[...]
Perhaps talk ? Short and simple, although not exactly equal in meaning
to dialog.
That's probably the best suggestion so far, but I'm still not convinced
it's really much better than dialog. I
This issue seems to be a very recurring and still unsolved problem when
dealing with Web internationalization / multi-language Web Apps.
I would like to suggest this to be reviewed with an editor comment please.
Additionally, it's important if we could decorate separately the file path
text field
On May 14, 2008, at 9:38 AM, Samuel Santos wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Samuel Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What I propose is to add a new attribute to the input element like
this:
attribute DOMString browseText;
this allows us developers to change the
I do not feel like having the file submission control styled and customized
in any way; submitting a file poses a serious security and privacy risk so I
would not like to see this control disguised as something else. Just like
an alert window title, it should have a consistent look for all
converse is more an adjective like opposite to me. Which is even more
awkward.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smylers
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 2:12 PM
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on HTML 5
Karl
Commands typed at a computer prompt do form a conversation between the
commander and the executor (if the executor responds - otherwise it is good
old CODE).
On the other hand, a speech is closer to a monologue (soliloquy).
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Zachary Carter wrote:
FWIW, in my first encounter with HTML5 dialog I assumed it meant a
dialog box. This might be due to my experience with the dialog element
in XUL[1], which is used for that. Also, dialog boxes are generally more
common from my
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:37 AM, fantasai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Zachary Carter wrote:
FWIW, in my first encounter with HTML5 dialog I assumed it meant a
dialog box. This might be due to my experience with the dialog element in
XUL[1], which is used
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Just after the algorithm for picking a media resource, there's a note that
states:
| A source element with no src attribute is assumed to be the last
| source element — any source elements after it are ignored (and are
| invalid).
However, that
My personal favorite alternate suggestion so far has been cl.
throat-warbler-mangrove, anyone? Of course it's not pronounced that way.
- Charles
I don't think this is a valid argument since you can change it anyway [1].
[1] http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/inputfile.html
Samuel
2008/5/14 Křištof Želechovski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I do not feel like having the file submission control styled and
customized in any way; submitting a file
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, John Foliot wrote:
[...] Full text transcripts external to their media extends the shelf
life of videos beyond what simple meta-data alone can provide. [...]
While support for both external and embedded captioning might be of
value, encouragement of the external
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves wrote:
On the examples:
Vorbis audio alone in Ogg container
source src=audio.oga type=audio/ogg; codecs=vorbis
Speex audio alone in Ogg container
source src=audio.oga type=audio/ogg; codecs=speex
This should be:
Vorbis audio
21 matches
Mail list logo
