On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that all enumerated DOMStrings in CanvasDrawingStyles should move
to enums. This seems cleaner and have no compatibility issues.
However, if we keep them as DOMStrings, I agree that textDecoration should
be one
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:51 PM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 05/04/2013 15:07, Henri Sivonen a écrit :
Please add an attribute to link that:
* opts an external style sheet out of synchronous CSSOM access
Sorry if my suggestion is naive, but why about an attribute to opt out of
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
The way iframe srcdoc is defined, the document URI does not in any way
encode the document contents.
Unfortunately, that breaks user-agent and extension features like open
frame in new window, show only this frame, open
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Why wouldn't this be a CSS issue? That's the layer of the Web platform
where we put presentationa-specific things.
You can't detect the size of something from within CSS, because then
you can change the size.
But in this
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 3/5/13 3:30 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
I'd be fine with having a Document descendant that is used for Documents
that have global scopes / browsing contexts / the works, and one that is
used for Documents that don't (e.g.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote:
On 01/02/13 15:39, Glenn Maynard wrote:
FYI, I would find this annoying. CC expiry entry forms are typically
select boxes containing 01-12. The text lines up with what's on my credit
card, so I don't have to translate
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
2013-02-12 19:26, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
The fact that authors today have a random assortment of displays for
the exact same feature (credit card expirys) is something that would
be great to fix, not bemoan as a loss
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Brian Blakely anewpage.me...@gmail.com wrote:
* Proposal
Meta elements for defining a canonical image and color to be associated
with the page(s) in which they are included. This is intended for use by
user agents and third-party applications (such as social
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Brian Blakely anewpage.me...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure thing. Let me go through the use cases that I see as applicable today,
derived from instances where an existing vendor or service currently
utilizes a non-standard implementation.
* Social network sharing
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
we were looking at how resetClip [1] could be implemented in WebKit.
Looking over the Core Graphics implementation, this feature can't be
implemented without significant overhead. I also found an email from 2007
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you believe it's OK to have 12 arguments or would a dictionary be better?
No, it's not okay. ^_^ Particularly when some of the parameters are
boolean - boolean positional arguments are the devil. Go with a dict.
~TJ
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
It restores the graphics state back to the state at 'save' time and this
includes the clip area.
'Clip' is a nested operation so every clip will be the intersection of the
existing clip area and the new one.
PDF also has
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
So the API could be as follows:
enum CanvasMaskType { luminosity, alpha};
dictionary maskOptions {
CanvasImageSource image;
unrestricted double? sx;
unrestricted double? sy;
unrestricted double? sw;
unrestricted
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:39 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
I thought I'd brought this issue up before, but I can't seem to find
a record of it.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/semantics.html#attr-style-scoped
currently says that, inside scoped style
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Bronislav Klučka
bronislav.klu...@bauglir.com wrote:
On 16.1.2013 8:23, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
Since the use cases are rare, is it better to force browser vendors to
develop code to implement it, in their own ways, than to let various
software developers set
On Jan 2, 2013 8:25 AM, fantasai fantasai.li...@inkedblade.net wrote:
On 04/08/2011 05:05 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
One option is to define that the list-style-type 'disclosure-*' as magic
values that mean to render a UA specific/platform
dependent widget. But that differs from all other
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:17 AM, David Young dyo...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 01:23:20AM +, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, Eric Sh. wrote:
I was trying out the HTML5 context menu in firefox and I saw that there
is no way(in the specs) to create an empty menu
On Dec 27, 2012 6:04 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
2. What values should the sort property allow. One idea is that it takes
a JS function similar to what JavaScript's sort function takes. If you
leave it out then it just does alphanumeric sort.
I was going to have a comparator
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote:
Use Case Description:
Linking to specific fragments of media is possible via media fragment
URIs [1]. However, it is not possible to apply a link to embedded
media
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Matt Falkenhagen fal...@chromium.org wrote:
The spec seems unclear on whether a magically aligned element[1] should
follow its anchor when its anchor moves, e.g., by dynamic style changes or
something like CSS animations.
I think we want the element to follow
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Matt Falkenhagen fal...@chromium.org wrote:
How are cycles with magically aligned[1] elements resolved?
For example, if a and b are dialogs and you do:
a.show(b);
b.show(a);
I think an anchoring cycle can also occur if an element |a| is anchored to
a
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
If we do stick with the method-based map, I strongly feel we should
match the JS Map API, and have a has() method as well. *Ideally
Currently, el.dataset is readonly. A friend of mine passed along a
use-case for making it writeable.
She's making a game, where the game initialization script expects
certain types of elements, and for the initial state data of the
elements to be present in data attributes on them. She'd like
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Only feedback left is the return types of set(), append(), and delete().
In Maps, set() returns the map, so you can chain more easily. TC39
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Alexandre Morgaut
alexandre.morg...@4d.com wrote:
Only feedback left is the return types of set(), append(), and delete().
Maybe remove() would be better than delete() as delete is a reserved JS
keyword ;-)
Nope, it's contextually reserved. You can use in
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
She's making a game, where the game initialization script expects
certain types of elements, and for the initial state data of the
elements to be present in data attributes on them
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 11/30/12 2:23 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
It would be somewhat cleaner if she could simply construct a
DOMStringMap and assign it, like so:
for(var i = 0; i cards.length; i++) {
cards[i].dataset = new DOMStringMap
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
To move forward on this, here are some proposals:
#1: Drop menu and all related features. I don't think we should do this,
but if we can't get agreement on what to implement, this is the only
option left, so it's on the table.
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
2) Remarkably, the current best candidate is a rendering pipeline that
attempts to use the DOM in immediate mode. The application performs
some application-specific processing to determine which portions of
the model can
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 11/19/12 11:16 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Subclasses aren't anything new - we're just referring to the standard
prototype-based subclassing.
OK. That's different from ES6 classes/subclasses, so it might be good to
get
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 11/19/12 11:20 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
To a first approximation, they shouldn't be. ES6 classes desugar into
functions and prototypes.
Hmm. They didn't completely at some point, but maybe something got changed
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 11/19/12 2:36 AM, David Bruant wrote:
I suppose the same goes for ES6 Map.
As Tab suggested, a Map subclass could certainly work
How close are subclasses to not being vaporware (both in spec and
implementation terms)?
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:34 PM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com wrote:
I feel the URLQuery object could be a regular object. Or maybe an ES6 Map.
If not an ES6 Map, maybe its API could be mapped exactly to ES6 Map. It
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
postMessage already has an ownership transfer list, we could always extend
the set of transferable types to include a canvas like thing (the context or
some such).
Transferring contexts is tolerable for 2d, but a
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Mark Nottingham m...@mnot.net wrote:
I've maintained a little library for a while that does inclusion:
https://github.com/mnot/hinclude
http://mnot.github.com/hinclude/
It's used in a few different places, and is now part of Symfony
http://symfony.com,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Edward O'Connor eocon...@apple.com wrote:
Hi,
I don't recall if this was in person or in email, but I think Tab made a
compelling argument in favor of changing the implementation of hidden=
to be
[hidden] {
display: none !important;
}
in the UA
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote:
I'm much more inclined to solve this from the data axis. Asking the table
itself to do the sorting is weird. Instead, you most often want to have
some
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:46 AM, A. Rauschenbach rauschenb...@annuo.de wrote:
Am 2012-10-19 18:49, schrieb Ian Hickson:
What is the attack scenario you are trying to avoid?
Without a discussion of what problem you're trying to solve, it's unclear
how to evaluate the proposal.
The idea of a
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@gmail.com wrote:
I was working on a bug [1][2] recently where authors had complained
about WebKit's behavior where clicking a scrollbar unfocuses the
activeElement. What's particularly quirky is that the window scrollbar
never moves focus
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Jonathan Watt wrote:
The use cases are simple. I want to be able to embed SVG as-a-document
(not as-an-image) and have it size to its intrinsic size, without
messing up the style of the SVG.
That's not a
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Mircea LUTIC mircea_lu...@yahoo.com wrote:
HTML 5 should include a way to create custom page header footer for
printing.
These should allow to include images
I think it should be something like
html
head
titleimg src=logo.svg/My company softwarebr/The
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Mike Dierken m...@dierken.com wrote:
Since a URL query string is not a strict map with only one value for a
key, would the get/set operations allow for an array as well as an
atomic value?
Yes. Regardless of the getters vs get() discussion, I think there was
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:28 AM, pghj pghjvanblokl...@gmail.com wrote:
== Incompatible property names when using itemrefs ==
Consider the following piece of HTML:
div itemscope itemtype=http://schema.org/Book; itemref=a ... /div
div itemscope itemtype=http://schema.org/LiteraryEvent;
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
I didn't really get around to working on URLs this week like I
planned, but I managed to draft the query API that was discussed in
the last thread:
http://url.spec.whatwg.org/#urlutils
get() returns the first value.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Mark Callow wrote:
On 2012/10/06 7:09, Ian Hickson wrote:
I agree, when there's 3x displays, this could get to the point where we
need to solve it. :-)
With the current displays, it's just not that big a
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@gmail.com wrote:
I was looking at the canvas Path API and had some concerns. In
particular it's inconsistent with the rest of canvas:
We already have CanvasGradient and CanvasPattern in the global
namespace, so this should probably be
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@gmail.com wrote:
What of the fact that this breaks existing pages with input
id=Path that access it as just Path? Historically this has been a
non-starter for new APIs.
It would have been useful to bring this up as a problem in your
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
I wanted vendors to solidify consensus on a version close to what currently
exists, with minor changes for accessibility. The WHATWG and W3C have chosen
instead to make broad changes, as proposed in version 5/the
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
On Oct 2, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
I wanted vendors to solidify consensus on a version close to what currently
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
I have been thinking about introducing a .query attribute that would
return a special interface for this purpose, but what the right API
should be seems somewhat tricky. Adam and Erik came up with a solution
that
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Has there been any discussion about moving newly emerging APIs to a single
options object formal parameter?
This discussion is in the context of the SVG path API, which is an
attribute microsyntax. So, that's not
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
So, can we rename the 7-arg arcTo to ellipseTo? That seems to
support
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Omitting two numbers, one of which is zero, is easily no more a win
than the cost of having two different nearly-identical commands. Just
consider C/c and S/s; is it really worth
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
You are looking at the simplest possible use-case for A/a, nearly the
only case that can be done without trig, where you're starting and
stopping the arc at a quarter-turn. Try
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Returning to the original subject, we don't *want* optional arguments
here.
Well, the canvas API has optional arguments, so there's no way to be
consistent with canvas
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
So, can we rename the 7-arg arcTo to ellipseTo? That seems to support
your always [require] all the arguments recommendation. ^_^
Just have one arcTo command, that takes all
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Tyler Larson tallty...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 21, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
Support CSS Filters will satisfy this use case.
There are a number of built-in filters (such as sepia and constrast) and
even support for vertex and
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Heya, we at the SVGWG just resolved today to add equivalents for the
CanvasPathMethods interface arc/ellipse/arcTo commands to the path
element's syntax.
Ideally, we'd be able to use
Heya, we at the SVGWG just resolved today to add equivalents for the
CanvasPathMethods interface arc/ellipse/arcTo commands to the path
element's syntax.
Ideally, we'd be able to use the same names as Path, for minimal
confusion - path d='M0 0 arc 30 30 10 0 90 0' producing a line
from (0,0) to
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
And I suppose by weird formation you mean the example that starts with
!DOCTYPE Html
Html
Head
Title
Graduation Ceremony Summer 2022/Title
/Head
Body
H1
can anybody tell me if this is known/on
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012 11:35 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Another solution could be SVG inventing their own elements
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
...
The paragraph and span concept in SVG
wouldn't be the same thing so it's not an antipattern. You would have
to specify some kind of x/y
This is a continuation of a discussion started in the #whatwg IRC
room, so I'll start somewhat abruptly.
1. Check out http://www.xanthir.com/etc/railroad-diagrams/example.html.
See all those boxes full of text in the diagrams? Looks simple,
right? Just a box filled with text, with a border and
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Hans Muller hmul...@adobe.com wrote:
On 9/6/12 6:36 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Consider the following example:
img srcset=800.jpg 1x, 1600.jpg 2x style=width: 100%; height: auto;
For a screen that's somewhere near 800px wide, this works just
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name wrote:
It should never be possible to make a contenteditable element contain
nothing, once it has something in it, because then it would collapse
to zero height and you wouldn't be able to click on it. (IIRC, some
browsers have
This email is an extension of the thread started at
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2012-August/036953.html
by John Mellor, distilling the core problem he has into a more
easily-understood and digested form.
The srcset attribute, as currently written, is not friendly to large
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:07 AM, David Geary david.mark.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
Ms2ger points out (without endorsing) that there's an:
8) Have every author who wants their canvas to stick around call
toDataURL() and stick
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote:
On 08/27/2012 07:01 PM, Andy Davies wrote:
On 27 August 2012 20:25, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
True, so this is perhaps closer to an IME
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote:
On 08/30/2012 12:12 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
It shouldn't be a new input type, because it's not a *type* of value.
Barcodes are simple a wrapper for a value, to make it more easily
machine-readable. Scanning a barcode
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
I just added support for link rel=stylesheet crossorigin in Gecko.[1]
Such links are subject to CORS checks if the load is cross-site, and the
sheet load will fail if the CORS check fails. If the CORS check succeeds,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Randy ra...@prowebdesign.nl wrote:
On top of that, the vast majority of these readers just translate it
back to text. It's just another input device
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Dumez, Christophe
christophe.du...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
The latest specification of the structured clone algorithm [1] does
not indicate that we are supposed to serialize expandos on objects
such as String, Boolean or Number.
For example:
var str = new
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:22 AM, John Mellor joh...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
I doubt this is actually what you want, though - you're probably not
actually trying to cater to devices with an 8:1 pixel ratio! (Those
may not ever exist, even
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Mark Watson wats...@netflix.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I heard that there was some discussion of banning the use of synchronous
operations within document onclose handlers.
Whilst it is obviously bad to hold up the closing of a document - especially
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:20 PM, John Mellor joh...@google.com wrote:
CSS image-set and HTML img srcset are getting their first implementations
but both APIs have serious shortcomings. We should fix them before it's too
late:
1. Neither is of any use for flexibly-sized images.
2. srcset
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:20 PM, John Mellor joh...@chromium.org wrote:
CSS image-set and HTML img srcset are getting their first implementations
but both APIs have serious shortcomings. We should fix them before it's
Currently, the CSS image-set() function (sister spec to img srcset)
is specified to do fallback to the less-desirable options if the first
choice doesn't load or can't be decoded. I specified it this way
because it seemed reasonable, and it's how the similar image()
function works (which is
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:28 PM, John Mellor joh...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:20 PM, John Mellor joh...@google.com wrote:
1. Neither is of any use for flexibly-sized images.
This is what Media
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Aug 14, 2012 10:54 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Yeah, and that's not compatible with how drag and drop are implemented
on
the Web
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:19 PM, fantasai
fantasai.li...@inkedblade.netwrote:
The CSSWG discussed drag-and-drop pseudo-classes today. The current
proposal is to have three pseudo-classes:
* One for the element
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Sebastian Zartner
sebastianzart...@gmail.com wrote:
* One for all elements representing possible drop targets
that could receive the item.
* One for all elements representing drop targets that do
not accept this type of item.
This sounds like
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
I'm asking how we're supposed to implement this pseudo-classes given that
the only way to know whether an element can receive the item is by firing
dragenter and/or dragover events. e.g.
No, we can know it declaratively via
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Erik Reppen erik.rep...@gmail.com wrote:
My understanding of the general philosophy of HTML5 on the matter of
malformed HTML is that it's better to define specific rules concerning
breakage rather than overly strict rules about how to do it right in the
first
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Erik Reppen erik.rep...@gmail.com wrote:
This confuses me. Why does it matter that other documents wouldn't work if
you changed the parsing rules they were defined with to stricter versions?
As far as backwards compatibility, if a strict-defined set of HTML
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Erik Reppen erik.rep...@gmail.com wrote:
Browser vendor politics I can understand but if we're going to talk about
what history shows about people like myself suggesting features we can't
actually support I'd like to see some studies that contradict the
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Andy Davies dajdav...@gmail.com wrote:
Would also like to see if there's a way of using srcset to hint to the UA
that it can skip the image under low throughput conditions e.g. GPRS.
Same would apply to image-set in CSS
The image-set() function already includes
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Robert Eisele rob...@xarg.org wrote:
Browsers are very restrictive when one tries to access the contents of
different domains (including the scheme), embedded via framesets. This is
normally a good practice, but I'd suggest to weaken this restriction for
the
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
How do img srcset and CSS image-resolution interact? What happens with
e.g. img srcset=foo.jpg 2x style=image-resolution:2dppx?
I think that the @srcset resolution should be treated as an intrinsic
resolution. In your
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Edward O'Connor eocon...@apple.com wrote:
As things currently stand in the spec, implementations basically need to
keep N+1 bitmaps per canvas, where N is the number of hit regions. I
doubt any implementors would be enthusiastic to implement hit regions
like
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Chaals McCathieNevile w...@chaals.com wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 03:03:48 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net
wrote:
* Andri Sævar Sigríksson wrote:
suggestion
Boolean value
implemented as Window.nobackspace or Navigator.nobackspace
if set to
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jesús Ruiz García
jesusruiz2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello again to all the group whatwg.
I have a second proposal, which like the first, I do not know if it can be
useful for inclusion in HTML5.
This time, I want to speak to you of the virtual tours, used by
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Jesús Ruiz García
jesusruiz2...@gmail.com wrote:
I start indicating that this message can be considered useless. I apologize
for this.
A few weeks ago I was in the chat #WHATWG, and asked how to send an email
to the list on a proposal to HTML5 (JavaScript).
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Andy Davies dajdav...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm under the impression that a UA has to download all stylesheets
regardless of whether they will be used e.g. print, mediaquery may never
match etc.
I've had a crawl through the specs but can't find the behaviour
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Paul Court p...@pmcnetworks.co.uk wrote:
As a HTML author and programmer, I just cannot see myself implementing the
current srcset proposal on sites. As a programmer, it has very much got what
we would call a bad code smell.
img src=face-600-...@1.jpeg alt=
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net wrote:
On 22 maj 2012, at 15:57, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net wrote:
I think that 3x device is very very unlikely to ever happen, since 2x
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:03 PM, brenton strine
brenton.str...@gmail.com wrote:
However, it still looks like the most upsetting implication of his
timeline, namely that the WHATWG is prioritizing implementors over
authors, remains unclarified. Is it a misconception to say that the
levels of
I don't wish to get into he said/she said discussions, but your
email contains some incorrect characterizations. The mailing list
contains all the relevant history of the discussion for anyone wishing
to verify it for themselves.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Mathew Marquis
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Mathew Marquis m...@matmarquis.com wrote:
I don’t think this is the case. The public has largely resigned this to
“`srcset` is happening because the WHATWG said so,” for certain, and that
doesn’t seem entirely false—but I don’t think “hopeless acceptance” is
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Matthew Wilcox m...@matthewwilcox.com wrote:
On 19 May 2012 00:37, Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2012 23:11:45 +0100, Matthew Wilcox m...@matthewwilcox.com
wrote:
picture in its current form is unable to support bandwidth-based
201 - 300 of 925 matches
Mail list logo
