On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 12/2/10 1:06 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
img does, though, if the resource for whatever reason hasn't been
received and successfully decoded yet.
I think showing @alt in this context for img would be _really_ weird
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
I think we could spec the following cases:
1) img containing a fully loaded image; size is the intrinsic size of the
image
2) video when it's displaying a video or fully loaded poster image; size
is the intrinsic
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
For example, I've recently been playing with fractals in canvas, and
temporarily set my blog to have a screen-filling canvas z-index'd
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
I've gone with using element() for selectors (limited to only ID
selectors, but other valid selectors are accepted, they just don't
currently do anything). Then element-ref() takes an ident, which the
js function maps
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 12/02/2010 12:42 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr.jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've gone with using element() for selectors (limited to only ID
selectors, but other valid
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
In the absence of compelling use cases, I'd just leave it at img, canvas
and video and whitelist in more elements later if necessary.
input type=image? object/embed seem to have roughly equivalent
use-cases to video
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
In the absence of compelling use cases, I'd just leave
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 11/26/10 11:39 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
But CSS gradients are already requiring interpolation in premutiplied
space, right?
I think you're thinking of CSS Transitions, which we decided should run in
premultiplied.
Right now, canvas gradients interpolate their colors in
non-premultiplied space; that is, the raw values of r, g, b, and a are
interpolated independently. This has the unfortunate effect that
colors darken as they transition to transparent, as transparent is
defined as rgba(0,0,0,0), a
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:04:37 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I agree that unless we get other groups in on this change, and get
things like SVG cross-references and CSS styling reacting to these id
and
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Philip Taylor excors+wha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Right now, canvas gradients interpolate their colors in
non-premultiplied space; that is, the raw values of r, g, b, and a are
interpolated
(This is being sent to the WHATWG list, rather than the CSSWG list, as
it seems like the sort of thing that should be primarily defined in
HTML, with a CSS spec just referring to the HTML definition, like
:active and similar things.)
Webkit has for some time now supported using the
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Webkit has for some time now supported using the -webkit-canvas()
function in CSS anywhere you could use an image
(http://webkit.org/blog
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Simon Fraser s...@me.com wrote:
On Nov 20, 2010, at 7:46 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
To be clear, chrome.tabs.getZoomPercentage is a Chrome extension API. Having
extensions that can mess with zoom seems like a legit use-case. But I agree,
I can't think of good
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
From my humble author's POV, CORS is easy enough for tasks like the one I
mentioned, if:
- it is applicable at the server side with common scripting languages such
as PHP
It is, very easily. For pages that are already
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 11/16/10 12:56 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
- it is applicable at the client side without scripting
This is not possible, for the simple reason that the whole point of
CORS is to protect server resources. If you could
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
What use-case are you trying to address that you think the suggestion in
this thread (make @srcdoc imply @sandbox) is incompatible with? At the
moment it appears that you're confused
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Diogo Resende drese...@thinkdigital.pt wrote:
Hi,
Is there any draft or spec for styling element scrollbars? I really like
the webkit spec (::-webkit-scrollbar*). I think this is as important as
styling buttons or video controls. Any security concerns I don't
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Another note on WebSRT:
seeing the addition of the bdi element into HTML, we probably also
need to add that to WebSRT cue level markup to allow bidirectional
text formatting.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
I would expect a style of rendering where all words are first
displayed in ordinary display and e.g. painted in a different color as
the time reaches them. Something like:
::cue {
color: black;
}
// this is
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Daniel Cheng dch...@chromium.org wrote:
However, this leads to issues like file system paths being exposed through
properties like x-special/gnome-icon-list or even text/plain. What is
the expected behavior here? Mirroring the native dragging clipboard allows
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 03:12:38 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Allowing both blob URLs and data URLs for workers sounds like a great
idea.
FWIW, Opera supports data URLs for Worker (but not SharedWorker since
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Tony Gentilcore to...@chromium.org
wrote:
The simplest way to address this is probably to advertise support via
an agreed upon meta tag. e.g.
meta name=NavigatorSearchBoxSupport
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Mounir Lamouri
mounir.lamo...@gmail.com wrote:
Tab, you seemed to support this proposition when I made it. Is it
planned to have that implemented in Webkit?
I have no clue. I'd have to ask around and see who's implementing that.
~TJ
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Rob Evans r...@mtn-i.com wrote:
Has the canvas spec changed the way the drawImage function scales before
drawing to canvas?
It doesn't specify how the function scales at all: Note: This
specification does not define the algorithm to use when scaling the
image,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Jim Williams jgwilli...@mindspring.com wrote:
I tried out local storage, used it to save the contents of a
content-editable passage. It worked great in Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and
MSIE. Only one problem: Every time I switched browsers, I had to start
over
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Biju bijumaill...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571822
Firefox fires the timeupdate event once per frame.
Safari 5 and Chrome 6 fire every
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Simon Fraser s...@me.com wrote:
The problem with a 'newFrame' callback is what to do if the callback
takes longer than the duration of a single frame. Does the video engine
start dropping frames, or does the video lag?
Dropping frames would be the better
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
I think an ideal API for video frame processing would involve handing video
frames to a Worker for processing.
Mm, yeah, probably. But then you'd need to be able to do canvas on
workers, and hand the data back...
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Rostislav Hristov
rostislav.hris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for a way to define valid partial HTML fragments that can
be included into other documents using a server-side language or
injected using AJAX. The current specification doesn't have any
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:19:17 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
We could say that a custom voice has to start with some punctuation or
other, say :philip?
Yes, that would be better than numerical voices IMO.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:11 AM, zhao Matt mattzhao...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to know the differences between these HTML5 drafts( I don't want to
know more details about the differences, and just want to know the major
changes),
Could someone know where to find such Information?
Which
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:00 AM, zhao Matt mattzhao...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. I am a newbie ;)
BTW, some revisions(e.g. 5443, 5439) are displayed in red background. What
does it mean?
The color is an indication of the type of edit. If you hover the link
in the revision message, you'll see
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, fantasai fantasai.li...@inkedblade.net wrote:
On 08/29/2010 08:00 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 8:15 PM, David John Burrowes
bain...@davidjohnburrowes.com wrote:
I agree that they don't have access to versioning info from within
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:06:43 +0200, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
This change clashes with data-*.
How? Are you missing the fact
2010/8/31 Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:13:04 +0100, Justin Schuh jsc...@chromium.org
wrote:
At least as currently drafted, srcdoc is not a security feature. It's a
convenience feature. It is also designed to work well in tandem with a
particular security feature
2010/8/31 Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net:
On 31.08.2010, at 23:39, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
At least as currently drafted, srcdoc is not a security feature. It's a
convenience feature. It is also designed to work well in tandem with a
particular security feature (sandbox). But by itself
While talking with the implementor of @srcdoc in Webkit, it came up
that, though @srcdoc is *designed* for use with @sandbox, the author
still has to explicitly add @sandbox to the iframe or else they
don't get the sandbox security model.
Can we make this automatic? Specifically, when iframe
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 30, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
While talking with the implementor of @srcdoc in Webkit, it came up
that, though @srcdoc is *designed* for use with @sandbox, the author
still has to explicitly add
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Should @seamless imply @sandbox too, then?
I think there lots of use cases for seamless that don't require
sandbox. For example, suppose a site wants
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 8:15 PM, David John Burrowes
bain...@davidjohnburrowes.com wrote:
I agree that they don't have access to versioning info from within the
languages.
But, CSS has some sense of versions (CSS, CSS2, and CSS3). This gives me
some ability to say ah, SurfBrowser 1.0 and
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 8:16 AM, zhao Matt mattzhao...@gmail.com wrote:
According to HTML5 spec, the embed tag can play a swf file, however, the
object tag can also play a swf file (though object is defined in HTML4).
I don't understand why need the embed tag , because the object tag can
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:54 PM, E.J. Zufelt li...@zufelt.ca wrote:
Good evening,
I am rather new to this list and am curious if anytime recently there has
been discussion about adding tabstrip and tab elements to the html5 spec?
The concept of a tabstrip is a rather commonly used UI
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 3:32 PM, E.J. Zufelt li...@zufelt.ca wrote:
It is important to provide semantic markup for complex UI controls where they
are common, tabstrip/tab is one example of a common UI component that
requires markup. This way meaningful information about the role of the
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
It would, however, be good to have an indication where HTML would like to
see it going. Would it be better for a media fragment URI for images such as
http://example.com/picture.png#xywh=160,120,320,240 to
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:21:28 +0200, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
I'd be OK with not supporting karaoke or anime fansubbing at all
declaratively (requiring those use cases to be addressed in JavaScript) or
with
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:33 PM, WhatWg wha...@gmail.com wrote:
However, it seems that since input is an empty element, the content cannot
be added after.
Right; inputs don't have children. (In some actual implementations,
they just automatically hide their children from the rest of the DOM.)
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 06:32:33 +0200, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Hmm, good point. Any other suggestions?
Mozilla has already added
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
The HTML5 spec doesn't say UAs should treat li value=-1 different
from a negative value specified for any long. For example, a get on
the reflected attribute li.value should return -1. In this test
case:
!doctype
It *appears* that the minimum you're asking for is some way to include
the bitrate/etc. information in the source element so that you can
switch between them in js, right? You're not trying to add something
that will cause changed browser behavior?
In that case, your solution already exists -
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Diogo Resende drese...@thinkdigital.pt wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010, Eitan Adler wrote:
For type=gps I was thinking something like the following:
1) type=gps results in a (double?) text box which takes a latitude
and a longitude
2a) there is some css
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
If you receive an empty text box then a required element works to validate
against empty input. As you produce the input for the select list, it's
pretty stupid to say that it shouldn't have an empty string for
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Leif Halvard Silli
xn--mlform-...@xn--mlform-iua.no wrote:
wha...@whatwg.org, Mon, 9 Aug 2010 18:16:12 -0700 (PDT):
Author: ianh
Date: 2010-08-09 18:16:10 -0700 (Mon, 09 Aug 2010)
New Revision: 5258
pAuthors are encouraged to use UTF-8. Conformance
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Justin Schuh jsc...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm working on implementing iframe.srcdoc in WebKit, and section 2.5.1
states:
This specification defines the URL about:srcdoc as a reserved, though
unresolvable, about: URI, that is used as the document's address of
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Diogo Resende
drese...@thinkdigital.pt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 10:00 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Does a type=location offer any similar benefits over a pair of
type=number inputs?
Yes, of course. Instead of a numeric keyboard (I never saw one on my
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
1. data: urls are unique-origin automatically, and there's no special
handling of that wrt sandbox=allow-same-origin (that is, the flag does
nothing, because the url isn't same-origin to begin with). �...@srcdoc
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
It *appears* that the minimum you're asking for is some way to include
the bitrate/etc. information in the source element so that you can
switch between them in js, right? You're not trying to add something
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Mike Wilcox m...@mikewilcox.net wrote:
This seems like the ideal situation to use a placeholder attribute:
select required=true placeholder=Select an item...
option value=Foo Foo /option
option value=Bar Bar /option
option value= None /option
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Ryosuke Niwa ryosuke.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
wrote:
On Mon, August 9, 2010 15:10, Daniel Glazman wrote:
Le 09/08/10 03:11, Kit Grose a écrit :
should the year field also permit the entry
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Christoph Päper
christoph.pae...@crissov.de wrote:
Justin Lebar:
Christoph Päper christoph.pae...@crissov.de wrote:
Why do you want to put this on the HTML level (exclusively), not the HTTP
level?
If you reference an image from a CSS file and include that
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/5/10, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll note, though, that that isn't a very useful pattern for users in
the first place. Most users won't have any idea what to do with a
video file, especially
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
I think it might make sense to expose file upload progress on a form
to a same-origin server. It would be interesting to see how the equivalent
feature in XMLHttpRequest is received before we add this, though.
I've made a note
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 12:43 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Do browsers supply a file extension for un-extensioned files based on
the mimetype? I didn't think they did. A file without an extension
confuses most
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010, bjartur wrote:
First of all I think we should use a rel=embed href=uri-ref
instead of source.
What problem would this solve?
It would tell UAs that don't implement HTML 5 that the value
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Thomas Koetter
thomas.koet...@id-script.de wrote:
Aryeh wrote:
That's invalid markup. The first child of a dl (if any) must be a
dt. I don't know what the semantics of dl are supposed to be with
no dt.
According to the spec it is perfectly acceptable to leave
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Justin Lebar justin.le...@gmail.com wrote:
We at Mozilla are hoping to ship HTML resource packages in Firefox 4,
and we wanted to get the WhatWG's feedback on the feature.
For the impatient, the spec is here:
http://people.mozilla.org/~jlebar/respkg/
and
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Michael Kozakewich
mkozakew...@icosidodecahedron.com wrote:
Dennis wrote:
Yes, but that wouldn't help since I want to force downloads regardless
of the browser settings. Maybe it would do if the type was set to
application/octet-stream, since those, by default,
2010/8/2 Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net:
Downloads can be forced already with Content-Disposition: attachment. It's
just harder to do, and unfortunately that doesn't stop webmasters from
trying. Popular PHP snippets for forcing download are among the most
disgusting cargo-cult code
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:39 PM, David Flanagan
da...@davidflanagan.com wrote:
James Robinson wrote:
For example, I think
drawing a 20x20 image into a 500x500 canvas without scaling with a
globalCompositeOperation of 'copy' should result in only the 20x20 region
being cleared out, not the
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Leonardo Dutra leodutra...@gmail.com wrote:
But this is not the point.
Composite A within the clipping region over the current canvas bitmap using
the current composition operator.
The word clipping is the point.
No, clipping is not the point either. The
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) g...@google.com wrote:
#1) Get rid of the infinite transparent black bitmap stuff and change it
to something that say only pixels inside the shape/image are effected
Like Ian said before, this is fine as soon as someone defines
precisely
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
There are some warnings in browsers for other security items:
This HTTPS Certificate is not valid, Continue / Cancel
That's recognized pretty universally as a horrible prompt that is
actively bad for the user.
It does
2010/7/28 Leo Dutra ™ leodutra...@gmail.com:
Hello, everyone.
I were asking myself about HTML5 input with type color. I'm a brazillian
developer and I see a huge problem with the new input type. The problem is
that RGB color names are expected to be written in English. This is not a
good, or
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:43 PM, David Flanagan da...@davidflanagan.com wrote:
Firefox and Chrome disagree about the implementation of the
destination-atop, source-in, destination-in, and source-out compositing
operators. Test code is attached.
Chrome doesn't touch any destination pixels
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Leonardo Dutra psy.leodu...@gmail.com wrote:
Em 28 de julho de 2010 18:05, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
escreveu:
2010/7/28 Leo Dutra ™ leodutra...@gmail.com:
Hello, everyone.
I were asking myself about HTML5 input with type color. I'm
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Most platforms have built-in mechanisms for showing dates and times in a
fashion of the user's chosing. I suggest using that. It may be that this
ends up being a lost cause, or that authors don't care about this, but I
think we
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Luke Hutchison luke.hu...@mit.edu wrote:
There is no legitimate reason that non-developers would need to paste
javascript: URLs into the addressbar, and the ability to do so
should be
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
This is about the fourth time I've said it here. Can the person in
charge of writing the slow and buggy ajvascript on the HTML 5 spec
please remove that?
The problem is that that whatwg page causes freezes and
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:35 AM, schalk sch...@ossreleasefeed.com wrote:
Hi there,
Has anyone/everyone read the blog entry on Youtube’s blog
(http://apiblog.youtube.com/2010/06/flash-and-html5-tag.html) regarding their
feeling about HTML5 video and why they still feel that Flash for video is
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:31:20 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
In any case, embedding
videos via iframe sandbox=allow-scripts should work fine, once more
browsers support it.
~TJ
What issues would
In the first paragraph of
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/elements.html#embedding-custom-non-visible-data
it says that a custom data attribute is an attribute in no namespace
whose name starts with the string data-, has at least one character
after the hyphen,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Marques Johansson
marq...@displague.com wrote:
What is the problem with #3? My recent emails on this list concern #3.
I know that anything that has been seen or heard can be recorded,
replayed, and redistributed by illegitimate parties but that doesn't
mean
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Doug Schepers d...@schepers.cc wrote:
Hi, WHATWG folks-
As you are probably aware, some differences have arisen between the W3C
draft of the HTML5 spec and the larger WHATWG version. In my opinion, the
specific technical details of any given feature (which,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
On 25.06.2010 18:11, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
...
Alternately, we could continue work solely in the HTMLWG. This would
not be possible unless we change the way the HTMLWG works somewhat,
though. There's a *reason
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mike Shaver mike.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
The WHATWG has a steering council made up of browser developers.
Officially, they can override Ian's decisions or make him step down as
editor
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Mike Shaver mike.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
I value technical merit even higher than convergence.
How is technical merit assessed? Removing Theora from the
specification, for example, seems like
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Mike Shaver mike.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Bottom of the charter: http://www.whatwg.org/charter
I believe the decision process is knife fight to first blood.
Editors should reflect
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Mike Shaver mike.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm pretty sure they won't be. Any significant implementer has always
had veto power over the spec.
I fear that simply refusing to
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
On 06/24/2010 11:04 AM, Kornel Lesinski wrote:
If you mean parsing with regular expressions, then I think that's a bad
practice and shouldn't be encouraged.
Worldwide, regarding HTML, I'm sure there is 100
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Ben Lerner t-be...@microsoft.com wrote:
Additionally, the sandboxing flags seem to be more a feature of the iframe
element than of the browsing context, because they depend on the value of
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:16:13 +0200, Kornel Lesinski kor...@geekhood.net
wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:38:07 +0100, Carlos Andrés Solís
csol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello! I've been noticing a problem in many HTML5 test apps,
On http://www.詹姆斯.com/blog/2010/06/html5-atom-gone-wrong, a comparison
is made between an example Atom feed (presumably constructed from blog
metadata) and one constructed by the HTML algorithm reading over the
example blog page. Not all of these differences are valid, but some
are, and should be
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Edward O'Connor hob...@gmail.com wrote:
2. The title of atom entries is constrained to contain text only,
That's not quite right. atom:title is an Atom Text Construct, which,
despite having the word 'text' in its name, can contain all sorts of
things.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Daniel Persson
danielperssondel...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not advocating ad-tags. The idea of globally structuring content on the
web is very appealing, it would make it easier for a lot of things and a lot
of people. Let's do it!
...but I can't see it
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Roger Hågensen resca...@emsai.net wrote:
On 2010-06-04 18:39, Daniel Persson wrote:
I am not advocating ad-tags. The idea of globally structuring content on the
web is very appealing, it would make it easier for a lot of things and a lot
of people. Let's do
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Roger Hågensen resca...@emsai.net wrote:
On 2010-06-04 22:03, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Roger Hågensenresca...@emsai.net
wrote:
...
As you can see the aside is outside the body, all latest browsers seem to
handle this pretty
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Diego Perini diego.per...@gmail.com wrote:
I have different behavior in browsers with the checked state of a checkbox
input element.
I have filed a ticket in Webkit and I am looking after some
advice/suggestion about the correct behavior expected from this
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 15:21 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Diego Perini diego.per...@gmail.com wrote:
I have different behavior in browsers with the checked state of a checkbox
input
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:16 AM, TAMURA, Kent tk...@chromium.org wrote:
An element is a candidate for constraint validation if
1. it is a validatable type,
e.g. true if input type=number, false if input type=reset
2. has no disabled attribute,
3. has no readonly attribute,
4. inside
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:42 AM, João Eiras jo...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:16:00 +0100, TAMURA, Kent tk...@chromium.org wrote:
An element is a candidate for constraint validation if
1. it is a validatable type,
e.g. true if input type=number, false if input type=reset
501 - 600 of 925 matches
Mail list logo
