Anders,
As you said, we may not get sufficient informations to standardize
digital signature. But, in case of Korea, I'll sufficiently give them.
The spec. and interface are almost standardized by governmental rules
to all vendors.
In Korea, the own cryptic algorithm has been encouraged, so
On 10/30/06, Anders Rundgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
It is equally interesting that W3C intends to start a new browser
authentication WG but have excluded digital signatures and key
provisioning from the charter in spite of the fact that about 10M
people today have
The use of proprietary mechanisms (mostly ActiveX controls) for
digital signatures is common in Korean sites as well, including
Korean government sites.
That's right. They sure are proprietary; I was not even able to get
the Korean e-goverment signature spec since it is secret!
Korean
Anders Rundgren [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2006-10-29 14:38 +0100:
It is equally interesting that W3C intends to start a new browser
authentication WG but have excluded digital signatures and key
provisioning from the charter in spite of the fact that about 10M
people today have to use proprietary
