On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote:
It still does not make it good UI. The case is similar to a set of radio
buttons with no checked button.
If we make bad UI non-conforming, conformance checkers will be pretty easy
to write...
#!/usr/bin/perl -wT
use strict;
print Your
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
I'm pretty sure we've been through this before -- I think it shouldn't
be, ratemy*.com thinks it should be, and there are more of those sites
than there are of me. :-) (Why they don't just use a set of numbered
input type=submits, which
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
At least some things clearly need to be allowed to be checked/selected
and disabled at the same time. In particular, checkboxes really need
this. Allowing this in some cases but not others smacks of trying to
dictate UI policy for content
On Mar 29, 2006, at 10:15 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Single select:
Is it conforming for an option to be both selected and disabled? (I
think it shouldn't be conforming.)
And analogously: Is is conforming for a radio button to be both
checked and disabled if the whole set is not disabled?
On Mar 30, 2006, at 06:56, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:15:38 +0700, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Single select:
Is it conforming for an option to be both selected and disabled?
(I think it shouldn't be conforming.)
I think it should be allowed. It's useful
On Mar 31, 2006, at 01:10, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
Is it conforming to have no option that is marked selected? (I
think allowing this is safe.)
I'm pretty sure we've been through this before -- I think it
shouldn't be, ratemy*.com thinks it should be, and there are more
of those sites
Quoting Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Whoa! It's even interoperably supported in Firefox and Opera.
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/test/wa10/adhoc/option-selected-disabled.html
It would be interesting to see what happens if it wasn't the first option
element child.
--
Anne van Kesteren
On Apr 1, 2006, at 16:18, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Quoting Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Whoa! It's even interoperably supported in Firefox and Opera.
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/test/wa10/adhoc/option-selected-disabled.html
It would be interesting to see what happens if it wasn't the first
On Apr 1, 2006, at 11:04 PM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Mar 30, 2006, at 06:56, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
...
I think it should be allowed. It's useful for dummy items like
Select your country which is pre-selected in the dropdown with the
list of countries.
Whoa! It's even interoperably
Henri Sivonen wrote:
Single select:
Is it conforming for an option to be both selected and disabled? (I
think it shouldn't be conforming.)
I agree with that.
And analogously: Is is conforming for a radio button to be both checked
and disabled if the whole set is not disabled? (This one is
Single select:
Is it conforming for an option to be both selected and disabled? (I
think it shouldn't be conforming.)
And analogously: Is is conforming for a radio button to be both
checked and disabled if the whole set is not disabled? (This one is
harder to check, but anyway...)
Is it
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:15:38 +0700, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Single select:
Is it conforming for an option to be both selected and disabled? (I
think it shouldn't be conforming.)
I think it should be allowed. It's useful for dummy items like Select
your country which is
12 matches
Mail list logo
