On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Fabien Meghazi wrote:
While I think there is certainly something to be said for the
proposal, I don't think there is enough evidence that authors really
want or need this. I think we should focus on having CSS support this
first.
Maybe we could think about a
Ian Hickson skrev:
I considered all the feedback on having a number element (or
similar), quoted below.
While I think there is certainly something to be said for the
proposal, I don't think there is enough evidence that authors really
want or need this. I think we should focus on having
While I think there is certainly something to be said for the proposal, I
don't think there is enough evidence that authors really want or need
this. I think we should focus on having CSS support this first.
Maybe we could think about a general purpose element which allows
formating for
On Dec 11, 2007 12:28 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tag type=datetime format=/mm/dd HH:MMTue, 11 Dec 2007
10:57:14 GMT/tag
Neither of those encodes the date - specifically, the month - in a
machine-readable format. We cannot expect all UAs to know every language
variant and
2007-12-11 06:20 Ian Hickson:
I considered all the feedback on having a number element (or
similar),
quoted below.
While I think there is certainly something to be said for the
proposal, I
don't think there is enough evidence that authors really want or need
this.
JFTR:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Quoting Michel Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe a number element would be valuable, both inside and outside
formulas, to provide format-neutral machine-readable numeric values:
n value=123456789.12123 456 789,12/n
So the machine can just infer the format inside
- Original Message -
From: Mihai Sucan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Simple numbers
| Le Tue, 06 Jun 2006 17:22:11 +0300, Michel Fortin
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
|
| Maybe a number element would be valuable, both inside and outside
| formulas, to provide format-neutral
Le Tue, 06 Jun 2006 17:22:11 +0300, Michel Fortin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Maybe a number element would be valuable, both inside and outside
formulas, to provide format-neutral machine-readable numeric values:
n value=123456789.12123 456 789,12/n
But it surly seems a little
Quoting Michel Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe a number element would be valuable, both inside and outside
formulas, to provide format-neutral machine-readable numeric values:
n value=123456789.12123 456 789,12/n
So the machine can just infer the format inside from the locale. The
only
Michel Fortin wrote:
n dec=,123 456 789,12/n
...
n base=16329F 2CA0/n
What about using it to mark up roman numerals as well? Or, I guess, any
other number system in the world?
nMMVI/n
Of course, people could use the roman numerals in Unicode: U+2160 to
U+2183, but most people
Le 6 juin 2006 à 6:37, Keryx webb a écrit :
The first problem is easily remedied. Wrap in a span and apply CSS
white-space: nowrap or (not quite as elegant) use non-breaking
space.
Have you tried using unbreakable spaces instead?
123nbsp;456nbsp;789,12
I'm curious to know if a screen
11 matches
Mail list logo
