On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Jim Ley wrote:
On 3/3/06, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://svn.whatwg.org/
Excellent, thank you very much.
My pleasure.
Converting the spec to wiki format is not an option while I'm an editor.
Good, Please don't do this even if some new editor came
On 3/3/06, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://svn.whatwg.org/
Excellent, thank you very much.
Converting the spec to wiki format is not an option while I'm an editor.
Good, Please don't do this even if some new editor came along - which
I don't want either. SVN is great, a few more
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Would it be possible to use (public) CVS or Subversion for the drafts that are
created so its easier to track changes in the document? Given that the document
is quite large it makes it hard to track fixes and additions. As a
reader/reviewer, I would have no idea what
Would it be possible to use (public) CVS or Subversion for the drafts that are
created so its easier to track changes in the document? Given that the document
is quite large it makes it hard to track fixes and additions. As a
reader/reviewer, I would have no idea what was done in the draft of 24
I can help with implementation/hosting of this if necessary. If it is
decided to go ahead with this, whoever's responsible is welcome to email
me off-list.
Jasper
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Would it be possible to use (public) CVS or Subversion for the drafts that are
created so its easier to
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:17:11 +0600, Anne van Kesteren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to use (public) CVS or Subversion for the drafts
that are created so its easier to track changes in the document? Given
that the document is quite large it makes it hard to track fixes and
