On 11/7/05, Mike Dierken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet, I have to add that what we've suggested is (almost)
useless. That's because the WA 1.0 specification already
contains something that can solve what we wanted: profiles [1].
[1]
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
He meant that the class names used should not be used to describe the
presentation, but rather describe the semantics. It is, however, ok to
use stylesheets to add styles based on the classes.
eg. These are bad practice:
span class=bold red-border
p
Henri Sivonen wrote:
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
He meant that the class names used should not be used to describe the
presentation, but rather describe the semantics. It is, however, ok to
use stylesheets to add styles based on the classes.
eg. These are bad practice:
span class=bold red-border
Quoting Mike Dierken [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#profile
Can the 'class' attribute have multiple values? If not, then a new attribute
would be needed, unless we overload the use of 'class' for presentation with
the use of 'class' for semantic
The class attribute! So efficient it must be wrong! :)
dave
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Nov 8, 2005, at 12:30 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Quoting Mike Dierken [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#profile
Can the 'class' attribute have multiple values? If not,
[Note: Quotation reordered for clarity.]
On Nov 8, 2005, at 12:30 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
The use of 'class' for presentation is wrong anyway (and hopefully
obsoleted in HTML 5). And yes, although it is named incorrectly,
the attribute can take multiple, space-separated, values.
--
Anne
The use of 'class' for presentation is wrong anyway (and
hopefully obsoleted in HTML 5). And yes, although it is named
incorrectly, the attribute can take multiple, space-separated, values.
Not. For. Presentation. ???
Could you explain? I use that to map to CSS all the time. What am I doing
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:30:41 +0200, Mike Dierken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:26:33 +0200, Dimitri Glazkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the tags attribute discussion, you guys just invented a
class attribute.
Well, that also was one suggestion, but 'class' is
Mike Dierken wrote:
Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
As for the tags attribute discussion, you guys just
invented a class attribute.
Well, that also was one suggestion, but 'class' is mostly for user interface
rendering, rather than purely semantic meaning. But it may not be necessary
or workable to
WG List'
Subject: Re: [whatwg] rel/rev for form ?
form action=houses-for-sale.cgi method='GET'
input name='zip' class='gov.us/postal/zip-code' type='text' /
/form
It would be cool to have a service that discovered these
forms and
then provided a search of all
Ok, here's my take:
Having rel/rev for a form element is logical. Hyperlink and form are
inherently related in that both are used to specify protocol of
communication. So, if hyperlink can have rel/rev, why not form?
As for the tags attribute discussion, you guys just invented a
class attribute.
Hello,
On 11/5/05, ROBO Design [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 00:17:27 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
...
Let me ask you some questions. (Your answers will help me know how to
explain things better.)
[...]
* Do you think being
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 12:30:11 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
...
I think I see one thing I didn't explain properly. Web crawlers would
NOT submit forms. But they would discover them. In essence, rel
and rev based formats on the form element would allow
13 matches
Mail list logo
