Re: [whatwg] header for JSON-LD ???

2017-07-23 Thread Michael A. Peters
Interesting. It's a beautiful way to create structured data separate from the content, just like layout (CSS) is best kept separate from the content. I wonder why people on this list don't like it. Reading about it was an epiphany for me, it's (in my opinion) the right way to do structured

Re: [whatwg] header for JSON-LD ???

2017-07-23 Thread Dan Brickley
Hypothetically, if search engines were to start picking up JSON-LD from linked files, which link rel type would this group consider most appropriate? Dan On 23 July 2017 at 06:12, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > 2ยข: This list tends to disapprove of JSON-LD, so you should

Re: [whatwg] header for JSON-LD ???

2017-07-23 Thread Qebui Nehebkau
On 23 July 2017 at 14:12, Michael A. Peters wrote: > It's a beautiful way to create structured data separate from the content, > just like layout (CSS) is best kept separate from the content. [...] I > wonder why people on this list don't like it. Reading about it was an

Re: [whatwg] header for JSON-LD ???

2017-07-23 Thread Michael A. Peters
On 07/23/2017 02:42 PM, Qebui Nehebkau wrote: On 23 July 2017 at 14:12, Michael A. Peters wrote: It's a beautiful way to create structured data separate from the content, just like layout (CSS) is best kept separate from the content. [...] I wonder why people on this

Re: [whatwg] header for JSON-LD ???

2017-07-23 Thread Michael A. Peters
On 07/23/2017 03:33 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: On 07/23/2017 02:42 PM, Qebui Nehebkau wrote: *snip* I can't speak for anyone else - I can barely speak for myself - but I think I'd argue that, intuitively, if your structured data isn't logically part of your content, there's a good chance