[whatwg] JSONRequest

2006-03-30 Thread Douglas Crockford
The central idea with the JSONRequest is that it is exempted from the Same Origin Policy. It allows for exchanging data with a server in any domain that specifically accepts JSONRequests. In order to be exempted from the Same Origin Policy, there are several restrictions on JSONRequest in

Re: [whatwg] JSONRequest

2006-03-30 Thread Anne van Kesteren
Quoting Douglas Crockford [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The central idea with the JSONRequest is that it is exempted from the Same Origin Policy. It allows for exchanging data with a server in any domain that specifically accepts JSONRequests. In order to be exempted from the Same Origin Policy, there

Re: [whatwg] Select conformance

2006-03-30 Thread fantasai
Henri Sivonen wrote: Single select: Is it conforming for an option to be both selected and disabled? (I think it shouldn't be conforming.) I agree with that. And analogously: Is is conforming for a radio button to be both checked and disabled if the whole set is not disabled? (This one is

Re: [whatwg] JSONRequest

2006-03-30 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Gervase Markham wrote: Douglas Crockford wrote: I have modified the JSONRequest proposal so that the Content-Type in both directions must be application/json/request. Er, why? Having two slashes in a content type is either extremely weird or completely illegal (glancing at the RFC, I'm not