Re: [whatwg] Side effects free scripts

2006-06-01 Thread Alexey Feldgendler
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:14:56 +0700, Andrew Fedoniouk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are software random number generators which gather entropy from user's input (the timing between keypresses, for example). And there are hardware random nubmer generators. How gather entropy from user's input

Re: [whatwg] Side effects free scripts

2006-06-01 Thread Alexey Feldgendler
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:21:02 +0700, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is that verifying whether function may result in side effects is a pain that must be delayed until runtime. You cannot know that methods, functions or constructors are side effect free unless they are host

Re: [whatwg] Side effects free scripts

2006-06-01 Thread Andrew Fedoniouk
- Original Message - From: Alexey Feldgendler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 11:03 PM Subject: Re: [whatwg] Side effects free scripts On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:14:56 +0700, Andrew Fedoniouk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are software random

Re: [whatwg] Side effects free scripts

2006-06-01 Thread Alexey Feldgendler
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 14:27:11 +0700, Andrew Fedoniouk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Consequence of halting problem is a Rice's theorem: it states that only trivial properties of programs are algorithmically decidable. No side effects is not a trivial property. It's not necessary to verify that a

Re: [whatwg] input type=text accept=

2006-06-01 Thread James Graham
L. David Baron wrote: I don't see why the same attribute _shouldn't_ be used to determine the type of data to allow, and whether to do spell checking or not. After all, whether to spell-check is directly related to what kind of data it is. This sounds a lot like object, which allowed for tons

[whatwg] http://whatwg.org/demos/repeat-01/

2006-06-01 Thread Christian Schmidt
The demo on http://whatwg.org/demos/repeat-01/ claims to have server-side fallback for legacy clients. But the fallback doesn't work in IE6 - the form doesn't submit. Is this intended? Christian

Re: [whatwg] input type=text accept=

2006-06-01 Thread Mikko Rantalainen
Lachlan Hunt wrote: L. David Baron wrote: We might want to use the accept attribute in the future to indicate what types of content can be sent, and thus what types of input the user agent should allow. Overloading that to get a boolean for whether spellchecking should be enabled seems broken.

Re: [whatwg] http://whatwg.org/demos/repeat-01/

2006-06-01 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Christian Schmidt wrote: The demo on http://whatwg.org/demos/repeat-01/ claims to have server-side fallback for legacy clients. But the fallback doesn't work in IE6 - the form doesn't submit. Is this intended? That's because IE has failed to default to type=submit for unknown type attribute

Re: [whatwg] input type=text accept=

2006-06-01 Thread Michel Fortin
Le 1 juin 2006 à 10:01, Mikko Rantalainen a écrit : That would be a nice example. Make sure that you mention that spell checker should be enabled only if spell checker supports the language the content is supposed to be written with. If UA only supports spell checking for English and you

Re: [whatwg] Mathematics on HTML5

2006-06-01 Thread James Graham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James Graham wrote: In this situation, I imagine most scientists will simply write LaTeX and use a tool to produce the output format that they desire. I doubt because LaTeX has not the sufficient capabilities for a full web design. Let me address this one point