On Saturday 2006-06-24 11:45 +0700, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
IMHO we should not rely on unspecified heuristics. In some browsers, they
work rather well, in some they might constantly fail. Leave heuristics for
invalid pages, quirks mode etc -- or document these heuristics.
I agree, but
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 12:27:33 +0700, Lachlan Hunt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once again, a CSS/XBL based approach would be better here.
I do not understand what you mean by a CSS/XBL approach in this context.
Moving the spellchecking control out of HTML into CSS or XBL binding.
--
Alexey
+1
I've read this discussion,but i do not understand exactly
why this should be denoted in markup.i do not understand why
it is needed anyway.is the lang attribute not sufficient?
what about denoting every paragraph in a document should be
spellchecked,and denoting every del not?
what do
Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
I'd say that if the user has globally disabled spellchecking, the author
should not be able to override this. However, author's ability to
explicitly disable spellchecking on some elements is meant to improve
usability.
I might be persuaded to allow an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 12:27:33 +0700, Lachlan Hunt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once again, a CSS/XBL based approach would be ere.
I do not understand what you mean by a CSS/XBL approach in this
context.
Moving the spellchecking control out of HTML into CSS or XBL
Quoting Matthew Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 12:27:33 +0700, Lachlan Hunt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once again, a CSS/XBL based approach would be ere.
I do not understand what you mean by a CSS/XBL approach in this
context.
Moving the spellchecking
L. David Baron wrote:
The problem is that heuristics are only heuristics when they operate
on input written without knowledge of the heuristics. When the input
was written with knowledge of the heuristics, they become de facto
standards.
Authors will learn what triggers spellchecking (or
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:14:02 +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
I've read this discussion,but i do not understand exactly
why this should be denoted in markup.i do not understand why
it is needed anyway.is the lang attribute not sufficient?
It's not sufficient because the lang attribute
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 16:26:19 +0700, Matthew Raymond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might be persuaded to allow an author to specify whether or not to
enable spell checking in the event that the user has not specified the
setting themselves for a specific type of input field. However, if, for
