Re: [whatwg] [HTML5] Named start values for lists?

2006-06-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
dolphinling wrote: HTML5 brings back the |start| attribute on ordered lists. This allows a list to semantically start with a number other than one. It seems like the major use case for this is to split lists up, so that a single list is marked by multiple ols. Other use cases include the

Re: [whatwg] [HTML5] Named start values for lists?

2006-06-27 Thread Anne van Kesteren
Quoting Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: However, there are several issues that would need to be addressed: [List of good points] * How does it interact with CSS counters. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/

Re: [whatwg] Spellchecking proposal #2

2006-06-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: On Jun 25, 2006, at 11:59 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: ... But realistically, browsers won't allow the user to easily override it if they want to, because any interface for doing that would be absurd. ... I'm sure there are other people that

Re: [whatwg] image captions

2006-06-27 Thread dolphinling
fantasai wrote: I'm wondering what WA1 considers appropriate markup for a figure with a caption. ~fantasai What's wrong with div img src= pThis is the caption./p /div ? That's how I think of it semantically, and I don't see it as being common enough to warrant a separate element of its

Re: [whatwg] image captions

2006-06-27 Thread Mihai Sucan
Le Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:00:21 +0300, dolphinling [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: fantasai wrote: I'm wondering what WA1 considers appropriate markup for a figure with a caption. ~fantasai What's wrong with div img src= pThis is the caption./p /div ? That's how I think of it

Re: [whatwg] image captions

2006-06-27 Thread dolphinling
Mihai Sucan wrote: Le Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:00:21 +0300, dolphinling [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: fantasai wrote: I'm wondering what WA1 considers appropriate markup for a figure with a caption. ~fantasai What's wrong with div img src= pThis is the caption./p /div ? That's how I think

Re: [whatwg] image captions

2006-06-27 Thread David Walbert
On Jun 27, 2006, at 7:42 AM, dolphinling wrote:But there's the implicit association given by the fact that they're there, together, in the div, and nothing else is. Do you really need anything more than that? There is also the implicit association given by the fact that the caption immediately

Re: [whatwg] image captions

2006-06-27 Thread Mihai Sucan
Le Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:42:13 +0300, dolphinling [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: Mihai Sucan wrote: There's nothing wrong with that. Yet, that's not exactly an image caption. There's no explicit association between the img and the following p. But there's the implicit association given by

Re: [whatwg] image captions

2006-06-27 Thread Mihai Sucan
Le Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:50:36 +0300, Michel Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: Le 27 juin 2006 à 6:00, dolphinling a écrit : What's wrong with div img src= pThis is the caption./p /div ? That's how I think of it semantically, and I don't see it as being common enough to warrant a