Re: [whatwg] Map lang to xml:lang at the parser level

2006-10-27 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Oct 27, 2006, at 03:17, Anne van Kesteren wrote: However, other types of programs processing HTML5 using XML tools would have to be allowed to consider xml:lang in text/html non- conforming and trashable, because what you suggest violates basic assumptions that XML processing software is

Re: [whatwg] Map lang to xml:lang at the parser level

2006-10-27 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:48:06 +0200, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, other types of programs processing HTML5 using XML tools would have to be allowed to consider xml:lang in text/html non- conforming and trashable, because what you suggest violates basic assumptions that XML

Re: [whatwg] Table integrity and conformance

2006-10-27 Thread Rohan Prabhu
Dear all,even i think that overlapping cells should not be supported, as it would be an encouragement to table based layouts. The specifications not supporting overlapping cells would encourage developers to use table for tabular data only. -- {Ro}h(a)[n]_-_[P]{rab}(h)u

[whatwg] innerHTML in XML

2006-10-27 Thread Anne van Kesteren
foo bar/ bar/ /foo How can foo.innerHTML be well-formed here? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Table integrity and conformance

2006-10-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Ian Hickson wrote: I think it would be good to require table integrity. Specifically I think overlapping cells would be a MUST NOT. That's fine for document conformance, but what about how browsers will handle it? Is the spec still going to require browsers to render overlapping cells, or

Re: [whatwg] Table integrity and conformance

2006-10-27 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:17:16 +0200, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's fine for document conformance, but what about how browsers will handle it? Is the spec still going to require browsers to render overlapping cells, or would it be possible to resolve this difference between

Re: [whatwg] Table integrity and conformance

2006-10-27 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Oct 27, 2006, at 16:21, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:17:16 +0200, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's fine for document conformance, but what about how browsers will handle it? Is the spec still going to require browsers to render overlapping cells, or would

Re: [whatwg] innerHTML in XML

2006-10-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Anne van Kesteren wrote: foo bar/ bar/ /foo How can foo.innerHTML be well-formed here? It could be if it were treated as an external parsed entity. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-extParsedEnt -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/

Re: [whatwg] Table integrity and conformance

2006-10-27 Thread Simon Pieters
Hi, From: Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] headers= will have a MUST requirement to point to TH elements in the same table, and will probably only be allowed on TDs. scope= will probably only be allowed for THs. In HTML4, as I understand it, TDs can act as both data cells and header cells if

[whatwg] Cross-reference elements

2006-10-27 Thread Simon Pieters
Hi, I notice that what was previously the i element is now the x element. [1] I realize that x is shorter than span. I don't think it's useful to have both to work with dfn. I suggest either make span don't work with dfn or drop x. I also think x should exclusively represent a