On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:04:04 +0100, Karl Dubost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though IMHO, layout engines are just one part of it. As I said above
parsing libraries, indexing bots, authoring tools are as MUCH important,
specifically if we want to stop the generation of tag soup.
It's not about
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:56:19 +1000, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 29, 2006, at 19:16, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
So what comes out will probably be a (perhaps evolved) version of
WHATWG stuff, as has been the case in some other W3C groups already.
That would be
On 10/30/06, Anders Rundgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
It is equally interesting that W3C intends to start a new browser
authentication WG but have excluded digital signatures and key
provisioning from the charter in spite of the fact that about 10M
people today have
Hey Joe,
Joe Clark wrote:
http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/
Note that in general I would encourage you to post your suggestions
straight to the WHATWG list, as it is not guarenteed that I will always
see your blog posts (though in this case, at least three separate systems
and
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Joao Eiras wrote:
Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
* Make embed legal. Give it up, people: object doesn't work and never
will.
HTML5 will make emded legal.
Object works pretty fine. embed is duplicated functionality, not as flexible
and accessible
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Due in no small part to WHAT WG�s leadership by a strict standardista
Well, the leadership applies different kind of strictness to the
tokenizer/DOM level and to semantics. Personally, I'd like the
tokenizer/DOM part to be a tad stricter and
Na , Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Joao Eiras wrote:
Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
* Make embed legal. Give it up, people: object doesn't work and
never
will.
HTML5 will make emded legal.
Object works pretty fine. embed is duplicated
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Joao Eiras wrote:
Browsers will continue to suport embed, but the recomendations
shouldn't.
Why not?
Embed doesn't provide a fallback mechanism, and mixing parameters to the
plugin, and attributes can be error prone, depending on the plugin,
while object
The use of proprietary mechanisms (mostly ActiveX controls) for
digital signatures is common in Korean sites as well, including
Korean government sites.
That's right. They sure are proprietary; I was not even able to get
the Korean e-goverment signature spec since it is secret!
Korean
Hello,On 10/30/06, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Joe,Joe Clark wrote: http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/[...]
This is a classic problem in HTML development: The people doing the work are geeks with computer-science interests who do not understand, for example, newspapers, or
Joe Clark wrote:
http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/
This is a classic problem in HTML development: The people doing the work
are geeks with computer-science interests who do not understand, for
example, newspapers, or screenplays, or, really, print publishing in
general.
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Would you be open to hearing suggestions about how to add native video
and video player support?
Sure. FWIW, there's a lot of interest in browser vendors about introducing
a video element or some such (or maybe making browsers natively
Hi,
I'll push a bit further on this issue. :-)
From: Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While that is true with the constraints of HTML4, we could allow forms
to be
direct children of tbody in HTML5.
table
form action=/edit method=post
tr
td
input type=hidden name=id value=1/
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Simon Pieters wrote:
table
form action=/edit method=post
tr
td
input type=hidden name=id value=1/
input type=text name=name value=First Row/
This also happens to be backwards compatible with legacy UA's.
Check the DOM for that
Hi,
From: Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FWIW, apparently I'm not the only one who thinks that having form as
child of tbody is intuitive.
Sure, it would be great. I've nothing against the idea in principle. I
just don't see how to execute it.
For backwards compatibility reasons we can't
Hello,On 10/30/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,On 10/30/06, Ian Hickson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote: Would you be open to hearing suggestions about how to add native video and video player support?Sure. FWIW, there's a
Ian Hickson wrote:
Joe Clark wrote:
http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/
FYI, my response to that his here.
http://lachy.id.au/log/2006/10/fixing-html
* Allow multiple uses of the same id/label in a form and suddenly it
becomes possible to mark up multiple-choice questionnaires
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:04:40 +0600, Douglas Crockford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been looking at the mashup problem. All scripts run with the authority
of the base page, so mashups are not indicated for any application containing
private data or managing a private connection. That is
Hello Lachlan,On 10/30/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote: Joe Clark wrote: http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/FYI, my response to that his here.
http://lachy.id.au/log/2006/10/fixing-htmlThat link doesn't work. (I get a 404.)See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux,
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:01:47 +0600, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Embed doesn't provide a fallback mechanism, and mixing parameters to the
plugin, and attributes can be error prone, depending on the plugin,
while object makes use of param.
Sure but, everyone uses embed, and object
Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
http://lachy.id.au/log/2006/10/fixing-html
That link doesn't work. (I get a 404.)
Fixed, thanks. There seems to ge a bug WordPress that causes posts to
get marked as private for some unknown reason.
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Would you be open to hearing suggestions about how to add native video
and video player support?
Sure. FWIW, there's a lot of interest in browser vendors about introducing
a video element or some such (or maybe making
Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
On 10/30/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Places like YouTube and Google Video work around this by
building their own interface using Flash, which handles multiple formats
seamlessly for the user.
Not exactly. Flash players only play FLV video files.
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:05:10 +0600, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I aware that there are many implementations of ogg available, but
Windows Media Player, Quick Time and Real Player don't.
http://www.illiminable.com/ogg/
http://xiph.org/quicktime/
24 matches
Mail list logo
