Michel Fortin wrote:
Le 6 nov. 2006 à 7:04, Matthew Raymond a écrit :
Michel Fortin wrote:
pThis paragraph has a footnotefnref for=my-footnote
supa href=#my-footnote1/a/sup/fnref./p
fnl
fn id=my-footnote
pThis footnote can contain block-level elements!/p
/fn
Michel Fortin wrote:
pThis paragraph has a footnotefnref for=my-footnote
supa href=#my-footnote1/a/sup/fnref./p
fnl
fn id=my-footnote
pThis footnote can contain block-level elements!/p
/fn
/fnl
I have a similar view, although I have some
At 07:04 -0500 UTC, on 2006-11-06, Matthew Raymond wrote:
[...]
| p annotation=my-footnote
| This paragraph has a footnote
| a rel=annotation href=#my-footnotesup[1]/sup/a.
| /p
What if you want multiple footnotes in the one paragraph?
p
This span annotation=my-footnoteparagrapha
Le 6 nov. 2006 à 12:32, Sander Tekelenburg a écrit :
Another thing is that whether the annotation should be considered a
footnote,
endnote or whateverelsenote seems to me a presentational issue, so
I'm not
that enthusiastic about calling it a footnote element. Why not
simply
annotation?
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 19:21:42 +0600, Matthew Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Footnotes and endnotes are identical in content in the context of a
print document and I am not certain how they'd differ even
presentationally on a web page, so yes, I think those can be
considered identical in
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
Scholarly books sometimes use both footnotes and endnotes for different
things -- footnotes for citations and endnotes for tangential
discussions, or vice versa. I've never seen an HTML document try to make
this distinction, though.
Distinguishing footnotes and
At 17:53 +0100 UTC, on 2006-10-31, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
[...]
W3C recently published a proposal on how to achieve
footnote/endnote presentations using the same markup [1]. The proposal
is quite simple. Given this markup:
div class=note../div
you would achieve footnoes with:
.note {
On Oct 31, 2006, at 7:20 AM, David Walbert wrote:
...
Footnotes and endnotes are identical in content in the context of a
print document and I am not certain how they'd differ even
presentationally on a web page, so yes, I think those can be
considered identical in terms of markup.
...
On Oct 31, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:54:12 +0600, David Walbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I would never want to require that a footnote be read to anyone,
thereby interrupting the text -- it is in the nature of a footnote to
be optional reading and
Le 30 oct. 2006 à 15:33, Ian Hickson a écrit :
* note and reference for footnotes, endnotes, and sidenotes (not
aside in “HTML5”)
Yes, this is an area where document and converter authors
currently need
to come up with their own class-based hacks. Ideally a continuous
media
user agent
Ian Hickson wrote:
* note and reference for footnotes, endnotes, and sidenotes (not
aside in “HTML5”)
If anyone has any ideas on this, please post them to the list. (The
CSS group is also looking at footnotes closely.)
It would useful to look at previous work and discussion on this issue.
On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:30 AM, James Graham wrote:I think and distinction between footnotes, sidenotes and endnotes is basically presentational and whilst we should try to ensure that markup+CSS can create all three appearances we shouldn't treat them distinctly. Footnotes and endnotes are identical
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:30:44 +0600, James Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pSome text span class=sidenotethis is a sidenote to put
in the margin/span and some other text./p
This seems to have a poor backward compatibility story - in a non-supporting
UA the note ends up in the flow.
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:54:12 +0600, David Walbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know how blind users prefer footnotes to be read for
them?
I would never want to require that a footnote be read to anyone,
thereby interrupting the text -- it is in the nature of a footnote to
be
Also sprach David Walbert:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:30 AM, James Graham wrote:
I think and distinction between footnotes, sidenotes and endnotes
is basically presentational and whilst we should try to ensure that
markup+CSS can create all three appearances we shouldn't treat them
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:53:04 +0600, Håkon Wium Lie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I agree. W3C recently published a proposal on how to achieve
footnote/endnote presentations using the same markup [1]. The proposal
is quite simple. Given this markup:
div class=note../div
you would achieve
Michel Fortin wrote:
Le 30 oct. 2006 à 15:33, Ian Hickson a écrit :
One thing to consider when
looking at footnotes is would the title= attribute handle this use
case
as well as what I'm proposing?. If the answer is yes, or almost,
then
it's probably not a good idea to introduce the new
I came across an article by Jesper Tverskov titled The benefits of footnotes in
webpages.
(http://www.smackthemouse.com/footnotes) It may be of interest.
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail
Sander Tekelenburg wrote:
At 20:35 -0800 UTC, on 2006-10-31, Jonathan Worent wrote:
I came across an article by Jesper Tverskov titled The benefits of
footnotes in webpages.
(http://www.smackthemouse.com/footnotes) It may be of interest.
IMO the problems with the title attribute he lists are
19 matches
Mail list logo
