Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
someListElement.select( li:not(li li), foo);
That selector won't work anyway, because (according to the Selectors
spec) :not() can only contain a single simple selector.
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
- Original Message -
From: Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew Fedoniouk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: whatwg List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 12:07 AM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Fw: Lists, ins/del, and a
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
someListElement.select( li:not(li li
- Original Message -
From: Alexey Feldgendler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Lists, ins/del, and a
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:09:26 +0700, Michel Fortin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ul
insliSome list
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:57:51 +0700, Andrew Fedoniouk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably, lists should implement a special DOM interface which allows to
iterate over the list items. Tables have such an interface.
Why not to implement just one simple function:
function foo(element) { ... }
