Re: [whatwg] Hacking away on forms ... (fwd)

2006-09-10 Thread Dave Raggett
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:40:34 +0200, Dave Raggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: p.s. implementing the output element would be a lot cleaner if more browsers supported the / syntax for empty elements that aren't part of traditional HTML. IE already does

Re: [whatwg] Hacking away on forms ... (fwd)

2006-09-10 Thread David Håsäther
On 2006-09-10 12:17, Dave Raggett wrote: On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote: You sure IE only does this for foo/ and not also for foo? It's my understand they are treated as being identical in every single browser. Whether or not such an element is treated as empty varies from

Re: [whatwg] Hacking away on forms ... (fwd)

2006-09-10 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:41:51 +0200, Francisco Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What does tags have to do with the DOM? Exactly, is this thread becoming a Opera marketing ploy? ? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Hacking away on forms ... (fwd)

2006-09-10 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Francisco Monteiro wrote: What does tags have to do with the DOM? We're talking about the DOM that IE produces when given specific markup. It has everything to do with the DOM! Exactly, is this thread becoming a Opera marketing ploy? What the...? -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/

Re: [whatwg] Hacking away on forms ... (fwd)

2006-09-10 Thread David Håsäther
On 2006-09-10 12:50, Lachlan Hunt wrote: Francisco Monteiro wrote: What does tags have to do with the DOM? We're talking about the DOM that IE produces when given specific markup. Sorry for not following the whole discussion. Exactly, is this thread becoming a Opera marketing ploy? What

Re: [whatwg] Hacking away on forms ... (fwd)

2006-09-10 Thread Dave Raggett
You can reproduce my tests by pointing your browser at: http://people.w3.org/~dsr/dom/test.html This will display an alert box with a representation of the DOM tree showing element and text nodes but not attributes. The string value from the node's nodeName property are shown within single

Re: [whatwg] Hacking away on forms ... (fwd)

2006-09-10 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Dave Raggett wrote: You can reproduce my tests by pointing your browser at: http://people.w3.org/~dsr/dom/test.html OK, I have the discovered the reason for the discrepancy in our results. Apparently IE handles exactly the same markup differently depending upon how it is added to the

Re: [whatwg] Hacking away on forms ... (fwd)

2006-09-09 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:40:34 +0200, Dave Raggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: p.s. implementing the output element would be a lot cleaner if more browsers supported the / syntax for empty elements that aren't part of traditional HTML. IE already does so, but Firefox and Opera do not. Firefox is