Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
Lets forget about ins or del as anyway this is better
ol
li class=new inversion=Some list item/li
li class=removed inversion=Another list item/li
/ol
I don't know what the inversion attribute is supposed to mean, but the
class attribute is semantically
Michel Fortin wrote:
Le 29 août 2006 à 23:00, Lachlan Hunt a écrit :
Michel Fortin wrote:
How can we markup removed or inserted list items? Here's a general idea:
ul
insliSome list item/li/ins
delliAnother list item/li/del
/ul
This can be solved by putting the ins and
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:51:39 +0200, Michel Fortin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The meaning of your markup is that you inserted and deleted some text
within each list item, not that you added or deleted a list item like in
mine. Semantically there is a difference, subtle maybe but still there.
Ric Hardacre wrote:
Another related thought we could discuss for revision control using ins
and del is that they could do with a couple of attributes, a datetime
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/text.html#adef-datetime
and an author:
pOn a dull and dreary afternoon ins
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:16:54 +0200, Lachlan Hunt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what the inversion attribute is supposed to mean, but the
class attribute is semantically meaningless. However, we could
introduce the edit and datetime attributes from the XHTML 2.0 draft's
Edit
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
del { display: none }
you'll see a one-item list for my markup, while for your markup you'll
see a second, empty list item.
That could be seen as a limitation of the styling language. It has been
repeated many times on this list that styling should not be taken
Le 30 août 2006 à 2:49, dolphinling a écrit :
What's more, it's not backwards compatible. I would *love* it if it
were (especially because then fieldset could also go there, and
repetition template attributes wouldn't have to apply to all
elements), but current UAs turn
- Original Message -
From: Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WHATWG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 1:35 AM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Lists, ins/del, and a
| On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:16:54 +0200, Lachlan Hunt
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I don't know what
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
we could introduce the edit and datetime attributes from the XHTML
2.0 draft's Edit Attributes Module [1].
I just realised that the datetime attribute from the Edit module would
clash with the proposed datetime attribute of the t element [1].
e.g. What would the datetime
Michel Fortin wrote:
(Note that everything applying to normal lists in this message could
also apply to definition lists and tables.)
The ongoing thread about a global href attribute versus a block-level
a element made me think of a similar situation concerning ins and
del. How can we markup
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:09:26 +0700, Michel Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ul
insliSome list item/li/ins
delliAnother list item/li/del
/ul
Changing this to allow the above markup has consequences on the DOM:
for instance we could no longer iterate on the content of a
Michel Fortin wrote:
How can we markup removed or inserted list items? Here's a
general idea:
ul
insliSome list item/li/ins
delliAnother list item/li/del
/ul
This can be solved by putting the ins and del elements as the only child
nodes of the li elements instead.
ul
- Original Message -
From: Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michel Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: whatwg List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Lists, ins/del, and a
Michel Fortin wrote:
How can we markup removed or inserted list items
Le 29 août 2006 à 23:00, Lachlan Hunt a écrit :
Michel Fortin wrote:
How can we markup removed or inserted list items? Here's a general
idea:
ul
insliSome list item/li/ins
delliAnother list item/li/del
/ul
This can be solved by putting the ins and del elements as the only
14 matches
Mail list logo
