On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:04:04 +0100, Karl Dubost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though IMHO, layout engines are just one part of it. As I said above
parsing libraries, indexing bots, authoring tools are as MUCH important,
specifically if we want to stop the generation of tag soup.
It's not about
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:56:19 +1000, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 29, 2006, at 19:16, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
So what comes out will probably be a (perhaps evolved) version of
WHATWG stuff, as has been the case in some other W3C groups already.
That would be
Karl Dubost wrote:
What will be interesting to see if they all perl, python, C, Ruby, etc.
libraries will follow this model once it is defined. It would be good I
guess for the new WG to gather implementation experience, not only in
desktop browsers but also in all applications consuming or
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:04:46 +1000, J. King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:16:44 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was at least one major issue in WF2 that came out from actually
*implementing*.
What was the problem?
Default values for
