+1
On 1/18/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 1/17/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got couple of modal window fixes for 1.2, can I commit it in?
-Matej
Hi,
Whenever I try to comment out parts of the markup I get weird exceptions
(attached below). I have tried to make a quick-start application to
reproduce this. But after trying very hard for at least half an hour I
could not create a case. Apparently, the exception only occurs in
complex
Hi,
I found the problem already. I'll create a Jira issue with the solution.
Regards,
Erik.
Erik van Oosten wrote:
Hi,
Whenever I try to comment out parts of the markup I get weird
exceptions (attached below). I have tried to make a quick-start
application to reproduce this. But after
FYI
wicket.markup.html.link.InternalFrame was empty:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/wicket/trunk/wicket/src/main/java/wicket/markup/html/link/InternalFrame.java?view=log
It's been replaced by InlineFrame, so I've removed it.
Al
Is the wicket-library web site offline? I am unable to view any of the
examples:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/upload
I was planning to demo Wicket's component set to my co-workers this
morning...
Sean
http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/
-igor
On 1/18/07, Sean Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the wicket-library web site offline? I am unable to view any of the
examples:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/upload
I was
include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-218 in 1.2.5
-igor
+1
Eelco
On 1/18/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-218 in 1.2.5
-igor
+1 (non binding)
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-218 in 1.2.5
-igor
+1 (non-binding)
On 1/18/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-218 in 1.2.5
-igor
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-218 in 1.2.5
I've only seen this once before, but why not?
+1
* Martijn Dashorst:
I'd rather see an extra step in our request processing that
detaches all pages and their child components that have
participated in the request processing, instead of relying on
the request targets to do so.
+1
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John
And perhaps get some subdomains for
build.wicketframework.org = http://81.17.46.170/bamboo
examples.wicketframework.org/1.2 = http://81.17.46.170/wicket12/
examples.wicketframework.org/1.3 = http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/
and so on.
Frank
On 1/18/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem is that wicketframework.org points currently to sf.net, and I
can't add subdomains without breaking the current wicketframework.org
site.
Perhaps we should also host wicketframework.org on that box, and
redirect traffic from sf.net site to our own box. Then this is
possible.
Please note
we do need a domain for our dedicated box, using ip addr sucks
-igor
On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem is that wicketframework.org points currently to sf.net, and I
can't add subdomains without breaking the current wicketframework.org
site.
Perhaps we should also
It has been proposed in several threads, so I'd like to make it more formal:
currently we host wicketframework.org on the sf.net servers. We can
move the content of the site to our own box (provided by
http://servoy.com) and host it there, and redirect traffic from the
sf.net server to the our
we could register wicketstuff.org, host our website there until we are ready
to move it to apache, we can even setup our confluence install there to
export our website to apache so we dont have to go through headaches
just dont think of wicketstuff.org as related directly to
wicket-stuff.sf.net
On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using Apache hardware seems to be a big deal for a community feel and
for a legal standpoint (iianm), and /should/ make things easier. If we
get migraines from dealing with the apache process, then we should get
more involved in the infra
18 matches
Mail list logo
