Re: Move parts of documentation from wiki to WICKETxSITE

2007-02-04 Thread nilo de roock
the hsqldb guys did a splendid job with their documentation they maintain it in docbook so they have a manual on-line, can generate pdf and a zillion other formats from it today's technologies (i.e. wiki's) are gone tomorrow, docbook is prepared for the future, write an xslt and you are ready -

Re: Move parts of documentation from wiki to WICKETxSITE

2007-02-04 Thread Eelco Hillenius
the hsqldb guys did a splendid job with their documentation they maintain it in docbook so they have a manual on-line, can generate pdf and a zillion other formats from it today's technologies (i.e. wiki's) are gone tomorrow, docbook is prepared for the future, write an xslt and you are ready -

Re: wicket-1.3

2007-02-04 Thread nilo de roock
Thanks, I blame it on my Wicketnewbieness for not finding my way around. Al Maw wrote: nilo de roock wrote: I downloaded wicket-1.x mvn install does not work ( see below ) Is there something wrong with the pom.xml, perhaps? Please read and follow the instructions on the wiki, which

Re: Move parts of documentation from wiki to WICKETxSITE

2007-02-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
It is as easy to maintain as the WICKET site. It is the same confluence. Same markup. If you can write in WICKET, then you can write in WICKETxSITE. After the export to cwiki.apache.org a script from Jeff Turner copies the contents of all confluence spaces to his people.apache.org home

Re: [Wicket-Dev] error in build

2007-02-04 Thread Johan Compagner
see a 2 or 3 post down: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-parent/README.TXT On 2/4/07, nilo de roock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use windows XP, downloaded wicket-1.x with svn to a directory wicket-1.x [J:\wicket-1.x]dir Volume in drive J is

[Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?

2007-02-04 Thread nilo de roock
Adventures in modern compillation of the phonebook app, 6 hours yesterday, 6 hours today, what a complete waste of time. Yeah, I know: you should not touch anything beyond 1.2.4 If you can't stand the heat... I am off. [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target]dir Volume in drive J is 50_05_27 Serial

Re: VOTE: wicket-datetime (was: VOTE: add Joda time as a dependency)

2007-02-04 Thread Johan Compagner
One of the issues with the old one was that it depended on the date format that was used by the date converter(s). It is/ was pretty ugly actually. It would be great if we would have a way to get the pattern that will be used for input/ output for date, time and number converters used by a

Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?

2007-02-04 Thread Johan Compagner
thats very strange. We do those build all the time and on our build server they are done after every commit http://wicketstuff.org/bamboo/start.action? i guess everybody can get the latest build (that was successful) from that location.

WICKETxSITE and svn

2007-02-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
As per requirement of our incubation process I have committed our exported site to our subversion repository. Changes to the stylesheet can now be done 'off line' and then committed to svn. If you have made such changes, and they are trivial or apparent bug fixes then please feel free to svn

Re: WICKETxSITE and svn

2007-02-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
As a warning... the contents of the html files is scrapped and overwritten by our export from confluence. So don't commit that to subversion. Martijn On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As per requirement of our incubation process I have committed our exported site to our

Re: [wicket-1.2.5] unittest failures when running from wicket-parent

2007-02-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
OK, I fixed the first one. the second doesn't come up anymore... Martijn On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The file upload field test fails because it can't find the DTD file. I think this is because the multimodule build keeps the startup directory inside the wicket-parent

Re: [wicket-1.2.5] unittest failures when running from wicket-parent

2007-02-04 Thread Frank Bille
On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The file upload field test fails because it can't find the DTD file. I think this is because the multimodule build keeps the startup directory inside the wicket-parent folder. We have talked about it before and I still have an outstanding

Re: [wicket-1.2.5] unittest failures when running from wicket-parent

2007-02-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
The fix: URI uri = new URI(getClass().getResource(localfileinclasspathdir).toString()); ... new File(uri) ... Martijn On 2/4/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The file upload field test fails because it can't find the DTD file. I

Re: VOTE: wicket-datetime (was: VOTE: add Joda time as a dependency)

2007-02-04 Thread Eelco Hillenius
isn't that how it is done with the old datepicker? it gets the format out of the converter Yeah, with this code: if (dateConverter == null) { // TODO this should be much easier and nicer to do in 2.0 IConverter

Re: Move parts of documentation from wiki to WICKETxSITE

2007-02-04 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Very cool. Thanks for explaining Martijn, Eelco On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is as easy to maintain as the WICKET site. It is the same confluence. Same markup. If you can write in WICKET, then you can write in WICKETxSITE. After the export to cwiki.apache.org a

Re: Move parts of documentation from wiki to WICKETxSITE

2007-02-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
I've created a document on our site for this... http://incubator.apache.org/wicket/writing-documentation.html Martijn On 2/4/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Very cool. Thanks for explaining Martijn, Eelco On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is as easy to

Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?

2007-02-04 Thread Nick Heudecker
I had something similar running 'mvn package' for the 1.3 snapshot: -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick5026495 Jan 30 12:27 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick 343219914 Jan 30 12:28 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick1381628

Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?

2007-02-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Hmm seems something wrong with the settings I think? Can you see what is inside the sources jar? It looks like it took your movies collection and put it in there. Martijn On 2/4/07, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had something similar running 'mvn package' for the 1.3 snapshot:

Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?

2007-02-04 Thread Nick Heudecker
It looks like it's attempting to jar up the entire 'wicket' directory. On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm seems something wrong with the settings I think? Can you see what is inside the sources jar? It looks like it took your movies collection and put it in there.

Re: VOTE: add Joda time as a dependency

2007-02-04 Thread Erik van Oosten
It is so big because it contains a snapshot of the tz database. Regards, Erik. Johan Compagner wrote: why is it so big? complete wicket is 1.5 so only some date manipulations are 1/3th? johan -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/

Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?

2007-02-04 Thread nilo de roock
Hi, ... building from source is just not for you ... That's too friendly, let me bite some dust. I explained why I can't use the snapshots for my purpose. To the point. I am not a quitter, as you can see: [INFO]Installing Q:\wicket-phonebook-1.x\target\wicket-phonebook-1.2.war to

Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?

2007-02-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On 2/4/07, nilo de roock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To the point. I am not a quitter, as you can see: Great! On the 2GB thing, how is that possible? It looks like the source plugin takes it one directory too high up. I'm curious if it added the whole j: drive. It took some time because there

Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?

2007-02-04 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Do you have commit access to the Wicket Stuff svn? If so, then you can modify the files. If not, I guess we can grant access. Especially when/if you are going to upgrade the groovy integration. Anyone object? I already added Nilo when he proposed to work on Groovy integration. Fixes are

[Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5

2007-02-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
This is a vote to release Wicket 1.2.5. I have uploaded (or am in the process of uploading) the distributions to my people.apache.org account. You can download the archives here: http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-1.2.5/ Please check the release and cast your vote. This vote is for

Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5

2007-02-04 Thread Eelco Hillenius
[ ] Don't release, because... [ x ] Share these files with the greater public Looks good! Eelco

Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5

2007-02-04 Thread Frank Bille
On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] Don't release, because... [x] Share these files with the greater public Well... :o) The artifacts looks ok since we don't release them as ASF endorsed. They of cause lack the stuff we have been working on for 1.3. One thing though.

Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5

2007-02-04 Thread Frank Bille
Another thing: Where is wicket-examples? Frank On 2/4/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] Don't release, because... [x] Share these files with the greater public Well... :o) The artifacts looks ok since we don't release them

Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5

2007-02-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
The artifacts looks ok since we don't release them as ASF endorsed. They of cause lack the stuff we have been working on for 1.3. The idea was to check if we don't rubberstamp our release. Any issues found with this release should be noted, and then flagged as not needed *this* time. One

Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5

2007-02-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Good catch! Martijn On 2/4/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another thing: Where is wicket-examples? Frank On 2/4/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] Don't release, because... [x] Share these files with the

Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5

2007-02-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Now available. Martijn On 2/4/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another thing: Where is wicket-examples? Frank On 2/4/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] Don't release, because... [x] Share these files with the