Re: 1.3 release/graduation schema

2007-05-22 Thread Erik van Oosten
Bruno, You can get snapshots from the maven snapshot repository at http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository. Erik. Bruno Borges schreef: Martijn, isn't possible to release as an Early Access ? :) []'s! -- Erik van Oosten http://2007.rubyenrails.nl/

Re: 1.3 release/graduation schema

2007-05-22 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On 5/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But most api is now stable i think so if stable api was the deciding factor if something is called beta or rc... Mostly the open bugs in JIRA is the deciding factor in naming a release. With 35 (give or take) open issues, I would not call a

Re: 1.3 release/graduation schema

2007-05-22 Thread Johan Compagner
really? open up the eclipse bug database and do a open bug query when the are about to release 3.3 i bet there are more then 35 issues then ;) johan On 5/22/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But most api is now stable i think

Re: 1.3 release/graduation schema

2007-05-22 Thread Xavier Hanin
On 5/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i think releasing one extra beta is fine. But most api is now stable i think so if stable api was the deciding factor if something is called beta or rc... From my point of view, a release candidate is a distribution you plan to graduate to

Re: 1.3 release/graduation schema

2007-05-22 Thread Johan Compagner
What would be the correct naming that the api is stable? API not stable: Alpha API stable: Beta Release 'stable' : RC ? johan On 5/22/07, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i think releasing one extra beta is fine. But most api is

Re: 1.3 release/graduation schema

2007-05-22 Thread Xavier Hanin
I'm not sure a beta always mean a stable API, but you can add in the release notes of a beta that the API is frozen. Look at the eclipse project, they only produce milestones, and starting at one of them in the release plan they say the API is frozen. So if your next distribution is API stable,

Re: 1.3 release/graduation schema

2007-05-22 Thread Eelco Hillenius
On 5/22/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i think releasing one extra beta is fine. But most api is now stable i think so if stable api was the deciding factor if something is called beta or rc... From my point of view, a release candidate is a distribution you plan to graduate to

Re: 1.3 release/graduation schema

2007-05-22 Thread Martijn Dashorst
If there are no objections, I would like to build a distribution based on thursday's code base, and vote on it during the weekend (giving us some time to test it), and then submit the release to the IPMC on monday. With a bit of luck we can make the release available on thursday next week (the

1.3 release/graduation schema

2007-05-21 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Looking at JIRA and some troubles we have on the lists, we won't be able to pull 1.3 rc1 any time soon. I therefore propose the folowing schema for the coming weeks: - release 1.3.0-incubating-beta2 - graduate + transfer to TLP - release 1.3.0-rc1 - release 1.3.0-rc2 - rename to 1.3.0 WDYT?

Re: 1.3 release/graduation schema

2007-05-21 Thread Bruno Borges
Martijn, isn't possible to release as an Early Access ? :) []'s! On 5/21/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at JIRA and some troubles we have on the lists, we won't be able to pull 1.3 rc1 any time soon. I therefore propose the folowing schema for the coming weeks: -

Re: 1.3 release/graduation schema

2007-05-21 Thread Jonathan Locke
a very important fix. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/1.3-release-graduation-schema-tf3793132.html#a10731160 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.