* Igor Vaynberg:
if it doesnt work 100% of the time then imho it shouldnt be in
the core, i think it should go into a separate module or
extensions.
Could you please decide where this feature goes and close
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-126
So that it is included in
The ssl certificate of Jira has expired :)
Erik.
Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
Could you please decide where this feature goes and close
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-126
--
Erik van Oosten
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
* Filippo Diotalevi:
BTW, is the reloading filter portable to Wicket-2.0? do you see
any problem in using it with w-2.0?
Yes the patch is compatible with wicket trunk. Nothing prevents
to do the porting AFAICT.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Hi,
The code to reload classes is already in Wicket branch 1.x, but
there's a (hopefully) last fix to apply.
Could one of you please have a look at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12346428/20061205-wicket-1.x-ReloadingClassLoader
* Use ArrayList instead of HashSet for the
Sure, done.
The issue is still open. I'm still not convinced we should ship the
reloading filter tbh. As it only works with quite a few ifs and buts,
I'd rather see the reloading filter (and class locator) to be part of
wicket-extensions or maybe as a WIKI article or such. Though I'm fine
with
* Eelco Hillenius:
As it only works with quite a few ifs and buts,
It works great with the wicket-examples and all Wicket
applications, but it's true that things get more complicated when
using a component manager like Spring, because then you need to
have proper separation
On 12/11/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, done.
The issue is still open. I'm still not convinced we should ship the
reloading filter tbh. As it only works with quite a few ifs and buts,
I'd rather see the reloading filter (and class locator) to be part of
wicket-extensions or
if it doesnt work 100% of the time then imho it shouldnt be in the core, i
think it should go into a separate module or extensions.
-igor
On 12/11/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, done.
The issue is still open. I'm still not convinced we should ship the
reloading filter
BTW, is the reloading filter portable to Wicket-2.0? do you see any
problem in using it with w-2.0?
I first wanted the implementation stable enough before we port the
changes to 2.0. There need to be a couple of tweaks before that filter
can be used, but not big things.
Eelco
