On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn/ Frank, I think I got all the headers, notices and patch to
wicket-parent done ok and testing building the whole bunch. But if one
of you could double check please...
* You have included the license header test but not executed it?
On 2/5/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn/ Frank, I think I got all the headers, notices and patch to
wicket-parent done ok and testing building the whole bunch. But if one
of you could double check please...
* You have
So do
I just instantiate the appropriate arrays (like cssIgnore) to mark
these Yahoo files to be ignored?
Ok, ok, I should read first, than ask. Answer is yes.
Eelco
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So do
I just instantiate the appropriate arrays (like cssIgnore) to mark
these Yahoo files to be ignored?
Ok, ok, I should read first, than ask. Answer is yes.
Yes! :)
Frank
On 2/5/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So do
I just instantiate the appropriate arrays (like cssIgnore) to mark
these Yahoo files to be ignored?
Ok, ok, I should read first, than ask. Answer is yes.
Yes! :)
Actually,
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, maybe not :) I tried:
cssIgnore = new String[] {
src/java/wicket/extensions/yui/calendar/assets/calendar.css
};
I normally just copy the string from the console output of the unit test
(without the prefix)
Frank
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/5/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, maybe not :) I tried:
One of the issues with the old one was that it depended on the date
format that was used by the date converter(s). It is/ was pretty ugly
actually. It would be great if we would have a way to get the pattern
that will be used for input/ output for date, time and number
converters used by a
isn't that how it is done with the old datepicker?
it gets the format out of the converter
Yeah, with this code:
if (dateConverter == null)
{
// TODO this should be much easier and nicer to do in
2.0
IConverter
It is so big because it contains a snapshot of the tz database.
Regards,
Erik.
Johan Compagner wrote:
why is it so big? complete wicket is 1.5 so only some date
manipulations are
1/3th?
johan
--
Erik van Oosten
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
why is it so big? complete wicket is 1.5 so only some date manipulations are
1/3th?
johan
On 2/2/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
For those who don't know, Joda Time: http://joda-time.sourceforge.net/
is a *much* better replacement of the Java date and time APIs it many
good idea. similar to the wicket-spring module.
On 2/3/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 for core
+0 for extensions
+1 for a wicket-joda core module
extensions is getting pretty big, its hard to find things. if i am using
joda in my project and see wicket-joda i immediately know
On 2/3/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Al, are you seriously working on date picker you want to contribute to
Wicket?
Yes, but it's really not very far along yet and I don't think we should
hold up 1.3 for it (certainly not the first beta at least).
Cool. We don't
My non-binding vote is go for it.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Hi all,
For those who don't know, Joda Time: http://joda-time.sourceforge.net/
is a *much* better replacement of the Java date and time APIs it many
ways (see their 'why Joda time section'). Also, Joda time will be the
basis of JSR 310
exactly what will you improve in core by having joda time? why cant it be a
dependency on the extensions? or why not make it a core module all onto
itself?
-igor
On 2/2/07, Philip A. Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My non-binding vote is go for it.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Hi all,
For
-1
I'm a big fan of joda time, but i think this should really be an
extension. even if it is better than the core wicket binder, 1/2MB is a
large addition to any project.
On 2/2/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exactly what will you improve in core by having joda time? why cant it
even if it is better than the core wicket binder
It's not just better, the current date converter is just wrong/ naive
imo (though this is a problem with most if not all competitors as well
in suspect).
Eelco
I'm all for using something that actually works. =)
On 2/2/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
even if it is better than the core wicket binder
It's not just better, the current date converter is just wrong/ naive
imo (though this is a problem with most if not all competitors as
18 matches
Mail list logo
