Hi
We have a form where we would like to disable the
complete form onsubmit so that the user cant change any of his selected values
and we would like to display a progress meter(it does not have to show the
actual progress just a gif like the AJAX
examples). I have been thinking of the
Why dont you just use the CheckGroup.onchange ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Decebal Suiu
Sent: 27. september 2006 21:01
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Wicket-user] CheckGroupSelector with CheckBox
Can I use
The wicket phonebook has
an example on howto do this or at least something similar..
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Macrae, Jeremy
Sent: 27. september 2006 15:44
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Wicket-user] Optional
confirmation
Hi Nino,
You can use the IndicatingAjaxLink, but I do not use it because I had
developped my own WaitingAjaxLink before I discovered this one ;-)
AFAIK, IndicatingAjaxLink add a progress indicator at the right of the
corresponding control.
My WaitingAjaxLink as a script before that make a
Hi,
i dont understand what you mean? - how can adisabled
onSubmit button stop the user from changing selected values?? if you plan it
ajax like, how can u be secure that the user has JS activated and doenst
deactivate it or ignore parts of it (like you can do with certain browser
plugins)
depends on the scenario he wants to use it, however, preventing the user to
send a form just wouldnt work
regards
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Pierre-Yves Saumont
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 11:29
An:
What wouldn't work? Do you mean the indicating ajax link wouldn't
prevent the user to resubmit the form, or are you thinking about another
problem?
Pierre-Yves
Korbinian Bachl a écrit :
depends on the scenario he wants to use it, however, preventing the user to
send a form just wouldnt work
Hello,
I have a question:
Suppose I have a detachable model which loads master instances (say
leagues entities using hibernate)
add( new ListView( leagues, new UserLeaguesModel( this.leagueService ) ) {
@Override
protected void populateItem( ListItem listitem ) {
League
Hmm You cant just use the checkgroupselectors.onchange?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Decebal Suiu
Sent: 27. september 2006 21:01
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Wicket-user] CheckGroupSelector with CheckBox
Can I use
it wouldnt work to prevent the user from doing sth. - even if he has JS
enabled, he might abuse it... ajax has always be treatet as unsecure... and
the basic problem the thread started with, cant be solved by ajax, it has to
be solved by the server checking the current state of the process thats
Completely correct.
As we generate a report when the user clicks the submit button, and while the
page are loading we dont want the user to play around in the mean while.
I've been thinking of combining some of the ajax stuff. Like having the ajax
modal window plus the progress indicator.
I do agree, but this is a usability question first of all.
Secondly I agree that I might have the class that are generating the report
wrapped as a thread and then having some ajax come ask if the thread is done
until it is done and then generate the link to the temporary storing url, and
Sorry for this previous mail its out of context and wrong.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nino Wael
Sent: 28. september 2006 13:59
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] CheckGroupSelector with CheckBox
Hmm You
I just did a little blog about the results of the thread:
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2006/09/wicket-for-bscs.html
Thanks,
Erik.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's
Thanks for fixed files, I've already commited those.
-Matej
Pierre-Yves Saumont wrote:
Now it seems to work fine provided the locale switching is made through
reloading the page and not through Ajax. (I enclosed the modified french
scripts, in utf8 and iso.)
If switching is made through
Joni Freeman wrote:
Yes, of course. This link should point to the archived plugin within the
update site.
http://www.laughingpanda.org/svn/wicket-bench/trunk/wicket-bench-site/plugins/wicketbench_0.4.0.jar
OK, So I did the upgrade manually, but it keeps throwing an exception when
it
Is there anybody out there who is already working on a manu bar
component for wicket-extensions? If not: perhaps I can generalize my
quick and dirty solution.
Stefan Lindner
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of
Well, technically, you're right. However, I think we are speaking of
different use cases. My use case is a fair user wanting to click on an
link and not aware that he has to wait for the result. So he might click
a second time if he's waiting too long. For this use case, we often see
a message
well, my experience is: if you put anything online, someone will come and
try to skrew it up :/
because of that, I see anything client side just as a gimmick and regard
all data coming from it as potential dangerous...
but helping users is also ok :P
Regards
-Ursprüngliche
The problem was I copied the fragment in the ListContactsPage and it had to be included in the BasePage which is the superclass of the former page. In my code I referenced the ListContactsPage.this variable otherwise it wouldn't have compiled.Thanks.Jaime.Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you
I use to experiment first and read only after. I remember few years ago
(in the pre mp3 era) I needed sound streaming in an applet so I wrote a
GSM decoder. Only when it was up and running, I searched the web and
found it was already available in JavaSound. (But of course, mine was
much better
I realise wicket:link is very simple and meant just for convenience, but
it's awfully convenient.
Would it make sense to have the concept of a base package? For example:
wicket:link base=com.mycompany.web
HomePage.html This is com.mycompany.web.HomePage
login/LoginPage.html This is
I'd love to see a menu bar for Wicket.
I've been researching the topic and I found these solutions
for non-Wicket frameworks:
Tapestry:
http://metamorphosis.krysalis.org/krysalis-menu/
Struts:
http://struts-menu.sourceforge.net/
Echo2 framework:
Same here. I am getting too much recursion in places I didn't have problem
earlier as well. Looking at the generated source, it is clear that the java
script gets included more than once, not just once in the header.
- Samyem
Pierre-Yves Saumont wrote:
I am afraid there is still a problem.
I could trace my problem to a recent change in wicket-ajax.js. In the
defination of processNext, it used to be that the run was called on a
timeout like window.setTimeout(run, 1);. Now this is only called for
isKHTML, and there is a direct call to run() otherwise. This for some reason
gave the
Hi Everyone,
I just finished implementing the phonebook example using Shades. I really like
the way the phonebook example abstracted everything so I could just plug shades
in. How can I contribute back the code?
Also, would it be possible to update the phonebook example to HSQLDB
26 matches
Mail list logo
