She was going off on him and even on Robin. Siobahn also complained about not
being invited to the roasts or anything.
Artie lost so he's got another loss. Two Day Free Sirius Trial Discussed. She
said she likes to see his blue eyes in the Howard TV shows. Howard asked Artie
how he remembers
Looks nice, having planned something similiar(at least using same technoligies)
in the future.
Having some sort of client with local db, and a backend server. Have you had
any trouble maintaining the client/server part of the application and or whats
your 2 cent on this topic?
_
Hi guys,
A blog comment poster asked Howard if the upcoming Tapestry 5 is a refactor
of Wicket.
https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180postID=266226734789322024
I think it wasn't a nice thing to say but hope the poster was trying to be
funny.
--
Beware of bugs in the above code;
I
Hey wicket users,
Just wanted to let everyone know I just released the first version of the
wicket-contrib-scriptaculous project. It's based on wicket-2.0, so it might
not work for everyone, but give it a try if your interested!
On 12/11/06, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey wicket users,
Just wanted to let everyone know I just released the first version of the
wicket-contrib-scriptaculous project. It's based on wicket-2.0, so it might
not work for everyone, but give it a try if your interested!
Hi,
I'm trying to create a generic Form component with its own markup. I was
under the impression that this would be possible using the
wicket:component tag.
An example:
MyPage.html
htmlbody
And here is the form:
form wicket:id=myForm
design mode html
/form
/body/html
wicket:component is not realy supported and it is not working at all
in 2.0 (yet). Doesn't javadoc mention that it is experimental?
Juergen
On 12/11/06, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to create a generic Form component with its own markup. I was
under the impression
wicket should be making or relative paths absolute if they are defined in
markup, eg you are not using an attribute modifier to set the path.
-igor
On 12/11/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I use the relative path at HTML include file for image, wicket will
not process and add
That comment on Howard's blog was a bit flamish, but otoh HLS seems to
have very long toes. Wow, remarks like 'One of the great things about
the Tapestry community is that they are quite a bit more enlightened
than uses in other communities' are pretty snobbish indeed.
There are a couple of
This http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-136 is probably
closer to what you are looking for. I use it myself, and it works
great. It's a simple addition to core, but I'd like to wait putting it
in there without introducing a lot of copy 'n paste code. And I'd
prefer Juergen to look at
I'll take some time to update the wiki with some info. That's a heck of a
lot easier than updating the maven-site. =)
On 12/11/06, Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/11/06, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey wicket users,
Just wanted to let everyone know I just
I wonder if my comment will emerge from blog moderation!...
Just asked if there was anything behind his claims (of Wicket users)
and noted the lack of equanimity compared with when he claimed the
reverse regarding refactoring!
/Gwyn
On 11/12/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That
Hello all,
I have an issue where on the same page I have to use the same component. My
application is datadriven, and those components need to have different
names and different business rules that are loaded on the runtime per
component. At the end of the day I want to have different htmls
Ah, I've been waiting for a FormComponentPanel! I tried myself at one
some weeks ago, but failed horribly :(
I hope I'll find the time to check this out soon, but at the moment I'm
still developing for 1.2.x. I have at least one component in my current
project that literally screams for a
you can use what is called a variation, see javadoc for
Component.getVariation() - you can override it and return a different
string. there is also a wiki page on variations.
-igor
On 12/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello all,
I have an issue where on the same page
What you can do for now is just copy-paste that code so that you have
your own FormComponentPanel. That'll work. Note that the one included
in the issue doesn't pick up wicket:head tags (though you can just
use HeaderContributor etc as always).
Eelco
On 12/11/06, Rüdiger Schulz [EMAIL
尊敬的客户：
您好！
因我司进项较多及受多家企业与公司的委托：将每个月票据向外提供代
开 ;我司以互惠互益解贵公司业务运作`补帐`作帐的燃眉之急;代开如下
票据服务:★普通商品/运输/广告/建筑安装/海关增值缴款书/服务业等
各种发票可以向外提供；并可上网查询或税务验证后款的方式与贵司
合作!
商琪!
手 机： 13510773029
联系人： 李 小 姐
E-mail： [EMAIL PROTECTED]
深 圳 市
On 12/12/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wicket should be making or relative paths absolute if they are defined in
markup, eg you are not using an attribute modifier to set the path.
Look like not if I use
http://wicket.sourceforge.net/apidocs/wicket/markup/html/include/Include.html
yes, only img and script/link tags are supported afaik. you need to add an
rfe for other tags/attributes
-igor
On 12/11/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/12/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wicket should be making or relative paths absolute if they are defined
in
It is img inside the HTML what I use Include. What rfe do you mean?
On 12/12/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, only img and script/link tags are supported afaik. you need to add an
rfe for other tags/attributes
-igor
On 12/11/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
I've been using 2.0-SNAPSHOT for a while now and I noticed a behavior
recently that is new. If I have an HTML id defined in my markup:
wicket:panel
div id=labels wicket:id=labels/div
/wicket:panel
When the panel is rendered the HTML id attribute is replaced with
something that is generated by
yeah i changed it, didnt think anyone was using this particular facet.
im not sure if we should put it back. the problem is sometimes you can paint
yourself into a nasty corner. if you have a component that uses a hardcoded
id, and later the user of that component uses it twice in a page, or
Imo, quite strongly this time, if it is explicitly set, it should be
honored. As for the dangers of having conflicting ids, we could
introduce another debug utility that checks on duplicate ids when (or
after) rendering.
Eelco
On 12/11/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah i changed
Hi Igor,
I also have a few hardcoded ids in my current Wicket 1.2 application.
Regards,
Erik.
Igor Vaynberg schreef:
yeah i changed it, didnt think anyone was using this particular facet.
im not sure if we should put it back. the problem is sometimes you can
paint yourself into a
24 matches
Mail list logo
