Ryan Sonnek wrote:
Hey wicket users,
Just wanted to let everyone know I just released the first version of
the wicket-contrib-scriptaculous project. It's based on wicket-2.0,
so it might not work for everyone, but give it a try if your interested!
Where could we get sources/javadocs? Does
On 12/12/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah i changed it, didnt think anyone was using this particular facet.
We use it also.
im not sure if we should put it back. the problem is sometimes you can paint
yourself into a nasty corner. if you have a component that uses a hardcoded
How do I add / use Javascript to enable a check box to select / deselect the
checkboxes (as shown in attached image) beneath it within ListView? Thanks
http://www.nabble.com/file/4551/checkboxes.JPG
--
View this message in context:
Hi I've trying to use the this example:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/best-practices-and-gotchas.html#BestPracticesandGotchas-Startingdownloadafterformsubmission%2528Wicket1.2%2529
WebResource export = new WebResource() {
@Override
public IResourceStream
I see two options for you either use models to employ your different rules or
build two entirely different components. I would go for using models since it's
good practice...
Somewhere I have a component that's basicly the palette component with an
dropdown(either ajax based or standard
I have this set of markups in a form with a AjaxSubmitButton.
During submit, I am supposed to send a feedback saved message to the
feedback panel and also update a Table that summarizes the form data posted.
In Firefox, feedback panel and Summary markups were successfully updated via
Ajax but IE
It is a known bug under IE, table elements can not be replace with
OuterHtml which is used is wicketAjax implementation. This bug has been
fixed : see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-143
--
Vincent Demay
http://www.demay-fr.net/blog/en
Ayodeji Aladejebi wrote:
I have this set
Folks, I'm back in da house after too long time away from Wicket and
started to work on a little webapp again.
Have migrated to 2.0 since I like the frontier. All is well except
that I have an AjaxSelfUpdating page that only updates once when
using Safari (latest). All works well in
Forgot to add that the code is avaliable here:
http://code.google.com/p/irrigator/source
Per Ejeklint wrote:
Folks, I'm back in da house after too long time away from Wicket and
started to work on a little webapp again.
Have migrated to 2.0 since I like the frontier. All is well
Would some one care to comment this?
Regards Nino
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nino Wael
Sent: 12. december 2006 11:55
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Wicket-user] Download file/ trying to use webresource using wicket1.2
plain
I haven't seen the plugin in wicket-stuff yet. Have I missed it?
On 12/10/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Anders,
Ok. So lets say that I'll transfer the code to the wicket-stuff
project. How shall we/I do it and what subdir should be used? I was
also thinking of a
Found the answer in examples,
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/compref?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.compref.CheckGroupPage
but the page is wrongly titled as wicket.markup.html.form.ListChoice.
TH Lim wrote:
How do I add / use Javascript to enable a check box to
Invoking the Link#setEnabled( false ) on a input type=button / element
will not disable the component.
The onclick handler will not be invoked (disabled) but it does not apper as
a disabled component.
Instead invoking Button#setEnabled( false ) will render the button disabled.
I think it
The source is available in the wicket-stuff subversion repository (
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-scriptaculous/).
I'll be posting examples on my blog (http://jroller.com/page/wireframe) and
I'll be updating the wicket-stuff examples in
Well, a Link can be attached to any HTML element so I think it can not
know (in general) how to render the element disabled. A Button component
can only be attached to an html button; for an html button it is known
what to do.
One could argue that the Link component can see what type of element
what is the generated url? if you set a breakpoint in getResourceStream() is
it hit?
-igor
On 12/12/06, Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I've trying to use the this example:
All comments/whatever/etc aside, I think some of your users are a little out
of control. Being passionate/supportive of a framework is one thing, but the
image of wicket that is perceived through these kinds of actions is
probably not what the developers/users of the framework would generally
The comments on that blog by HLS are outrageous, really. Like we
stated a thousand times before, we don't have anything against
Tapestry, and in fact regard it as one of the better alternatives.
We can't and we won't police 'our users'. It could be any random joker
putting that comment there (I
The Wicket developers have no control over what their users may or may not
do. HLS is simply hypersensitive and could use some maturity, rabid Wicket
users aside.
On 12/12/06, Jessek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All comments/whatever/etc aside, I think some of your users are a little
out
of
how do you know it wasnt one of tapestry's users posting that? its a
conspiracy!!!
-igor
On 12/12/06, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Wicket developers have no control over what their users may or may not
do. HLS is simply hypersensitive and could use some maturity, rabid Wicket
I think it may be quite the opposite. Those who cry the loudest and are
quickest to get rowdy are usually ones who have the most to be defensive
about. Perhaps it is partially some in the wicket area that could use some
boost of maturity? After all, if wicket was the greatest thing in the
After all, if wicket was the greatest thing in the
world why would people need to defend it so vehemently? It would just be.
Haha, right. I'm sure you're just making a joke here.
What particular remarks do you have in mind when you say 'defend it so
vehemently'? And how is your remark - you
It's a little of both. Howard is a tad over-sensitive and he tends to make
subtle yet derogatory digs at Wicket's expense. I don't really understand
this as he has nothing to be defensive about with Tapestry. It's a good
project and it's just getting better. The same can be said of Wicket.
尊敬的客户：
您好！
因我司进项较多及受多家企业与公司的委托：将每个月票据向外提供代
开 ;我司以互惠互益解贵公司业务运作`补帐`作帐的燃眉之急;代开如下
票据服务:★普通商品/运输/广告/建筑安装/海关增值缴款书/服务业等
各种发票可以向外提供；并可上网查询或税务验证后款的方式与贵司
合作!
商琪!
手 机： 13510773029
联系人： 李 小 姐
E-mail： [EMAIL PROTECTED]
深 圳 市
however, it isn't the Wicket dev team's responsibility to reign in the
comments of their users regardless of how poorly such comments reflect on
the Wicket community itself.
Maybe i can build a page in the core of wicket that will come up everytime,
no matter what the request is, if wicket
Perhaps you misread. I suggested that it ISN'T Wicket dev team's
responsibility Or were you just being funny?
On 12/12/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
however, it isn't the Wicket dev team's responsibility to reign in the
comments of their users regardless of how poorly such
Johan is our nbr one joker! :)
Eelco
On 12/12/06, Matt Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps you misread. I suggested that it ISN'T Wicket dev team's
responsibility Or were you just being funny?
On 12/12/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
however, it isn't the Wicket dev
Hi,
in my opinion, the logic with isAssignableFrom should be the opposite one
(wicket 1.2.3):
Object convert(..) {
...
// buggy, should be the opposite
//else if (value != null (!value.getClass().isAssignableFrom(c)))
else if (value != null (!c.isAssignableFrom(value.getClass(
...
}
Where
I think you're right. You can file issues at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET please.
Thanks!
Eelco
On 12/12/06, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in my opinion, the logic with isAssignableFrom should be the opposite one
(wicket 1.2.3):
Object convert(..) {
...
// buggy,
So far the liveliest thread I've seen on this mailing list, especially when
combined with the comments at
https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180postID=266226734789322024
I've been laughing my head off since yesterday each time I read a new post
from here and the blog site of Howard.
On 12/12/06, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far the liveliest thread I've seen on this mailing list, especially when
combined with the comments at
https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180postID=266226734789322024
I've been laughing my head off since yesterday each time I
No, I'm sorry you're wrong. I didn't cause it. With regards to my archives
on Tapestry, right, I've used Tapestry in the past. And I know that holds
also for many other Wicket users. In other words, I'm a Tapestry defector
:-). I've used Wicket for a medium sized site about a year ago. It was a
ahh the always nice isAssignableFrom..
How many times i had to think what was it again.. how does it work..
Why is that!
johan
On 12/12/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you're right. You can file issues at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET please.
Thanks!
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-161
Thanks,
Eelco
On 12/12/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you're right. You can file issues at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET please.
Thanks!
Eelco
On 12/12/06, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in
Hey, you saved my life Jan !
I always thought it was my problem wicket throwing exception's there. Now I
see it's Johan ! :-)
On 12/13/06, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in my opinion, the logic with isAssignableFrom should be the opposite one
(wicket 1.2.3):
Object convert(..) {
...
In defense of Johan, it was probably me that made the mistake :) Sorry
Eelco
On 12/12/06, Iman Rahmatizadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, you saved my life Jan !
I always thought it was my problem wicket throwing exception's there. Now I
see it's Johan ! :-)
On 12/13/06, jan_bar
36 matches
Mail list logo
