I feel the only reason why there are so many questions asked on this
list is because we can get so many and relevant answers. Nothing to do
with lack of documentation or Wicket being too difficult to use.
Pierre-Yves
Erik van Oosten a écrit :
Considering that Wicket's documentation is ok
However, the same or similar questions are asked frequently. We (the Wicket
users) should spend more time putting together FAQs.
On 12/1/06, Pierre-Yves Saumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I feel the only reason why there are so many questions asked on this list
is because we can get so many
I wouldn't say it's hard to use, but documentation can definitely
improve. Right now I learn most everything I need to know by looking
at example code, which isn't bad, but maybe it could be better.
Regardless, Wicket became my favorite framework in about a 24-hour
period, and I think it has a
I do not agree.
I think we (the Wicket users and Wicket website master) should spend
more time on making the existing FAQs more easily accessible.
:)
Erik.
Nick Heudecker wrote:
However, the same or similar questions are asked frequently. We (the
Wicket users) should spend more time
Congratulations, this mailing list is the most active java web framework
forum on Nabble!
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2006/11/wicket-most-active-java-web-framework.html
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the
And do we interpret this as good news or bad news. To play the devils
advocate here, this might also be interpreted as a framework with bad
documentation and hard to use. So people often have o consult the mailing
list to pose questions. What do you think?
On 11/30/06, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL
while this might make sense theoretically, practically it is not the case
check out the stats for struts user list
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.struts.user
and compare to wicket user list
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.user
struts user list has more traffic, and it is
On 11/30/06, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering that Wicket's documentation is ok (actually quite good
compared to many other products), I would like to interpreted it as good
news :)
Documentation can always be better and is always an issue for coders.
But the WIKI helped a
sure, but that doesnt mean that struts is buggy or is hard to use which is
what was implied.
-igor
On 11/30/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know. I tend to agree with Francis in that it can be explained
in several ways. Even with Struts you could say it attracts more
